UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant  ý

Filed by the Registrant
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:
o
Preliminary Proxy Statement
 
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
 
ýDefinitive Proxy Statement
 
oDefinitive Additional Materials
 
o

Soliciting Material under Rule
14a-12

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
(Name(s) of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

(Name(s) of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
ýNo fee required.
 
No fee required
o
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:         
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:         
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):      
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:      
(5)Total fee paid:      
o
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials
 
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11


Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust 2024 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement LOGO


LOGO

  
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:         
(3)Filing Party:        
(4)Date Filed:        

3043 TOWNSGATE ROAD

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361

April 19, 2024

 

3043 TOWNSGATE ROAD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361

April 7, 2016

Dear Shareholder:

I would like toYou are cordially invite youinvited to attend the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or the Annual Meeting, of PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 2016,June 12, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific time.Time. The Annual Meeting will be heldconducted online via live webcast at our corporate offices located at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361.

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024.

The Notice of 20162024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement are attached to this letter and contain information about the matters on which you will be asked to vote at the Annual Meeting. We will transact no other business at the Annual Meeting, except for business properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof by our Board of Trustees. Only our common shareholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2024, the record date, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Your vote is very important. Please carefully read the Notice of 20162024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement so that you will know the matters on which we plan to vote at the Annual Meeting, and then vote your shares by proxy by mail, by Internet or by telephone as soon as possible to make sure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. You may also cast your vote

ONLINE ANNUAL MEETING: To participate in person at the Meeting. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or bank, you must instruct that firm or bank as to how to vote your shares.

ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION: In order to attend theonline Annual Meeting, in person, you will need to present your admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of our common shares as oflog-in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024 using the record date, and valid government-issued photo identification. The indicated portion of your16-digit control number found on the proxy card, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or email, as applicable, previously sent or made available to shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Please read “INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION—Who can attend the Annual Meeting?” in the accompanying Proxy Statement. If it is determined the Annual Meeting will serve as your admission ticket.

be held at a different time or in a different location or format, an announcement of any such updates will be provided by means of a press release, which will be posted on our website pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) via its EDGAR system.

On behalf of our Board of Trustees, I thank you for your participation. Wewe look forward to seeing you on May 25th.your participation in our upcoming online Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,

 

Sincerely,
http:||content.edgar-online.com|edgar_conv_img|2011|04|15|0001144204-11-022213_SIG_STANFORDLKURLAND.JPG
STANFORD L. KURLAND
Chairman of the Board

 

LOGO

DAVID A. SPECTOR

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


LOGO

  


3043 TOWNSGATE ROAD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361

______________________

Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

______________________

Time and Date:11:00 a.m. Pacific time on Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Place:

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
3043 Townsgate Road

Westlake Village, California 91361

Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Date and Time:

  

Wednesday, June 12, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Location:

Online via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024

Record Date:

April 17, 2024. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or Annual Meeting, and any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof.

Mailing Date:

We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Proxy Statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 19, 2024 to our shareholders of record on the record date.

Items of Business:

  ·

To elect the two (2)three (3) Class I TrusteesIII trustees identified in the enclosed Proxy Statement to serve on our Board of Trustees, each for a term expiring at the 20192027 annual meeting of shareholders;

 
 ·

To ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;2024;

 
·

To approve, by non-binding vote, our executive compensation; and

 
 ·

To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Attendance:

  

To be admitted to the Annual Meeting virtually, you will need to log-in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024 using the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or email, as applicable, previously sent or made available to shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Please read “INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION—Who can attend the Annual Meeting?” in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

Record Date and Meeting Admission:Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 28, 2016, the record date, are entitled to attend the annual meeting.

Voting:

  
Proxy Voting:

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy by mail, by Internet or by telephone as soon as possible to make sure that your shares are represented at the annual meeting. You may also cast your vote in person at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or bank, you must instruct that firm or bank as to how to vote your shares.

Mailing of
Information:
Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials primarily via the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies of these materials to each shareholder. On or about April 7, 2016, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials, vote, and request paper copies of the proxy materials. Access to the proxy materials and online voting will be available at www.proxyvote.com. We believe this process expedites shareholders’ receipt of the proxy materials, lowers the cost of printing and distribution, and reduces the environmental impact associated with the annual meeting.

By Order of the Board of Trustees,

By Order of the Board of Trustees,

JEFFREY P. GROGIN
Secretary

LOGO

DEREK W. STARK

Secretary

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF

SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2016:JUNE 12, 2024:

This Notice of 20162024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement and 20152023 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Report on

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2023, are available at www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

1
OUR TRUSTEES

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

5
Trustee Nominees

CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY OVERVIEW AND GOALS

514
Class I Trustees – Term to Expire in 20195
Continuing Trustees5
Class II Trustees – Term to Expire in 20175
Class III Trustees – Term to Expire in 20186
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE, BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES7
Corporate Governance7
Independence of Our Trustees7
Board of Trustees Leadership Structure and Independent Lead Trustee7
The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight8
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics8
Corporate Governance Guidelines8
Corporate Sustainability8
Committee Charters8
Committees of the Board of Trustees8
Communications with our Board of Trustees11
Attendance by Members of our Board of Trustees at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders11
Board of Trustees and Committee Meetings11
Meetings of Non-Management and Independent Trustees11
OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT14
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS15
COMPENSATION OF TRUSTEES16
Non-Management Trustee Compensation16
2015 Trustee Compensation Table17
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION18
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE18
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS19
Executive Summary19
Executive Compensation Philosophy19
Executive Compensation Decision Making Process20
Elements of our Executive Compensation Program22
Compensation Decisions Made in Fiscal 201523
Share Ownership Guidelines24
COMPENSATION TABLES25
2015 Summary Compensation Table25
2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards26
2015 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End27
2015 Options Exercised and Stock Vested28
2015 Pension Benefits28
2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation28
Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment28
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation28
Compensation Risks29

i

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS29
Management Agreement29
Servicing Agreement29
Mortgage Banking and Warehouse Services Agreement29
MSR Recapture Agreement30
Spread Acquisition and MSR Servicing Agreements30
Loan and Security Agreement30
Loan Purchase Agreements31
Reimbursement Agreement31
Approval of Related Party Transactions31
REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE32

PROPOSAL I — ELECTION OF TRUSTEES

3319

Trustee Nominees

20

Continuing Trustees

21

Non-Management Trustee Compensation

25

2023 Trustee Compensation Table

26

Non-Management Trustee Share Ownership Guidelines

26

AUDIT MATTERS

27

Report of the Audit Committee

27

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

28

Fees to Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2023 and 2022

28

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

28

PROPOSAL II — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

3429
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

3430
Fees to Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2015

Security Ownership of Officers and 2014Trustees

3430
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Security Ownership of Other Beneficial Owners

3431

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

32

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

33

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

34

2023 Named Executive Officers

34

Executive Compensation Highlights

35

Executive Summary of 2023 Compensation

36

2023 Say-On-Pay Vote and Engagement with Shareholders

36

2023 Stakeholder Interactions

37

Executive Compensation Paid by PFSI

37

2023 Compensation Program Overview

40

2023 Compensation Decisions

40

Executive Compensation Decision Making Process

44

Peer Group and Benchmarking

46

Executive Share Ownership Guidelines

47

Clawback Provisions

47

Trading Controls and Anti-Pledging and Anti-Hedging Policies

48

COMPENSATION TABLES

49

CEO PAY RATIO

54

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE

55

PROPOSAL III — ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

3558
Supporting Statement

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

3559
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

3663
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

OTHER MATTERS

3663
OTHER MATTERS

INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION

3664

 

 

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statementi


 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

 

ii


3043 TOWNSGATE ROAD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA 91361

______________________

2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

______________________

PROXY STATEMENT

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (“we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”) is furnishing this Proxy Statement in connection withSummary

This summary contains highlights about our solicitationBoard of proxies to be voted atTrustees and our 2016upcoming 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or Annual Meeting. References in this Proxy Statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” the Meeting. We will hold“Company,” refer to PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust unless the Meeting at our corporate offices located at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, on Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific time, subject to any postponements or adjournments thereof. We are delivering the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Notice, to our shareholders commencing on or about April 7, 2016, which contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet, how to vote online at www.proxyvote.com, and how to request paper copiescontext otherwise requires. This summary does not contain all of the proxy materials.information that you should consider in advance of the Annual Meeting and we encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.

2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

  Date and Time:

Wednesday, June 12, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time

  Location:

Online via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024

  Record Date:

April 17, 2024

  Mail Date:

April 19, 2024

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

 

What am I voting on?

You will be entitled to vote on the following scheduled proposals at the Meeting:

 

 Matter·The electionOur Board Vote Recommendation 

Proposal I:

Election of two (2)three (3) Class III trustees to the Board of Trustees Scott W. Carnahan and Frank P. Willey,identified in this Proxy Statement to serve on our Board of Trustees, each for a term expiring at the 20192027 annual meeting of shareholders;shareholders

 

FOR each Trustee Nominee

Proposal II:

·The ratification

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;2024

FOR

Proposal III:

Approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation

FOR

Trustee Nominees

  Trustee Nominees Age 

 

Trustee

Since

  

 

Principal Occupation /

Key Experience

 

 

Committee

Membership

 

David A. Spector

 

 

 

61

 

 

2009

  

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust

 

 

 

None

 

Doug Jones

 

 

 

67

 

 

2023

  

 

Trustee, President and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer of PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust

 

 

 

None

 

Catherine A. Lynch

 

 

 

62

 

 

2022

  

 

Former Chief Executive and Chief Investment Officer of National Railroad Investment Trust

 

 

Audit

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

Related Party Matters

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement1


 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

Corporate Governance Highlights

We continuously monitor developments, trends and best practices in corporate governance and consider feedback from shareholders and proxy advisory firms, as appropriate, when enhancing our governance, policies and structure.

Shareholder Right to Amend the Bylaws. Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws provide shareholders with the concurrent right to amend our Bylaws by the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on a matter pursuant to a proposal submitted by a group of up to five shareholders holding at least 1% of our outstanding common shares continuously for at least one year.

Trustee Limitations on Number of Boards. A trustee who is currently serving as a chief executive officer of a public company, including our Chief Executive Officer, is not permitted to serve on more than two outside public company boards. No other trustee is permitted to serve on more than five outside public company boards.

 Majority Voting Standard in the Election of Trustees.Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard for uncontested trustee elections and a plurality voting standard for contested trustee elections.

 Independent Lead Trustee. On March 19, 2024, the independent trustees of our Board elected Preston DuFauchard as our independent lead trustee for a second three year term.

 Trustee Resignation Policy.Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a requirement that any trustee nominee who fails to receive a majority vote in an uncontested election will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board.

 Board Refreshment.We have robust processes to identify, evaluate and select qualified trustee candidates to become trustees and we regularly assess the size and composition of the Board. We have added four trustees since 2021.

  Shareholder Engagement. We value the perspectives of our shareholders. Our Investor Relations department regularly engages in outreach activities and discussions with a significant portion of our shareholders.

 Regular Executive Sessions.Our independent trustees meet privately on a regular basis. Our independent lead trustee presides at such meetings.

Robust Share Ownership Guidelines. We have robust share ownership guidelines for our non-management trustees (five times base annual retainer) and executive officers ($2 million for our Chief Executive Officer; $500,000 for all other executive officers).

Regular Board Evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee sponsors an annual self-assessment of the Board’s performance as well as the performance of each committee of the Board.

We believe our Board possesses deep and broad skill sets and specific experience and expertise that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction for us as a leading residential mortgage real estate investment trust, or REIT.

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

 

2·The approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation. LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

 

How does our Board of Trustees recommend that I vote on these proposals?

Our Board of Trustees, or the Board, recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees as Trustees identified in this Proxy Statement, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016,Trustee Skills and FOR” the approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation.

Who can attend the Meeting?

Our Board has set March 28, 2016 as the record date for the Meeting. If you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to attend the Meeting, although seating is limited. If you plan to attend, please check the appropriate box on your proxy card and return it as directed on the proxy card.

If you hold your common shares through a brokerage firm or bank and you would like to attend, please either (1) write us at Investor Relations, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, (2) email us atinvestorrelations@pnmac.com, or (3) bring to the Meeting a copy of your brokerage account statement or an omnibus proxy (which you can get from your broker).

In addition, you must bring valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or a passport. No cameras or recording devices of any kind, or signs, placards, banners or similar materials, may be brought into the Meeting. Anyone who refuses to comply with these requirements will not be admitted.

1

Who is entitled to vote at the Meeting?

If you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting and any adjournments thereof. As of the record date, 69,249,015 common shares were issued and outstanding. You are entitled to one vote on each proposal for each common share you held on the record date.

How many shares must be present to hold the Meeting?

The presence in person or by proxy of shareholders entitled to cast a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at the Meeting on any matter constitutes a quorum, which is required in order to hold the Meeting and conduct business. Since there were 69,249,015 eligible votes as of the record date, we will need at least 34,624,508 votes present in person or by proxy at the Meeting for a quorum to exist. If a quorum is not present at the Meeting, we expect that the Meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies.

What shareholder approvals are required to approve the proposals?

Trustees will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of our common shares voting in person or by proxy at the Meeting. Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm and approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of our common shares voting in person or by proxy at the Meeting.

How will voting on any other business be conducted?

Other than the three proposals described in this Proxy Statement, we know of no other business to be considered at the Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the Meeting, your signed proxy card or Internet or telephonic voting instructions will authorize Stanford L. Kurland, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey P. Grogin, our Secretary, to vote on those matters according to their best judgment.

How do I vote my shares as a shareholder of record?

If you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on the record date, you may vote as instructed on the proxy card by using one of the following methods:

·By Mail. If you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, please mark your selections on, and sign and date, the printed proxy card, and return the proxy card by mail in the postage-paid envelope provided.

·By Internet. To vote by Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions at that website. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, May 24, 2016. If you vote by Internet, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a registered shareholder, you will need to have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for Internet voting instructions.

·By Telephone. To vote by telephone, registered shareholders should dial 800-690-6903 and follow the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by phone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, May 24, 2016. You will need the control number found either on the Notice or on the proxy card if you are receiving a printed copy of these materials. If you vote by telephone, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a registered shareholder, you will need to have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for telephone voting instructions.

·In Person. If you attend the Meeting and plan to vote in person, you will be provided with a ballot at the Meeting. If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record and you have the right to vote in person at the Meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” and you wish to vote at the Meeting, you must request a legal proxy by following the instructions at www.proxyvote.com. Whether you are a shareholder of record or your shares are held in “street name,” you must bring valid, government-issued photo identification to gain admission to the Meeting.

If you vote prior to the Meeting, it will assure that your vote is counted. Even if you plan to attend the Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance of the Meeting, so your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Meeting. Whether you vote by mail, by Internet, by telephone or in person at the Meeting, the proxies identified will vote the shares as to which you are the shareholder of record in accordance with your instructions. If a printed proxy card is signed and returned and no instructions are marked, the shares will be voted as recommended by our Board in this Proxy Statement.

2

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares.

If my broker holds my shares in “street name,” how do I vote my shares?

If you own your shares in “street name,” you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker or other nominee. Your broker or other nominee has provided a voting instruction form for you to use in directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares. Please follow the instructions provided on such voting instruction form.

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

If you submit a signed proxy card and do not specify how you want to vote your shares, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows:

·FOR the election of two (2) Trustees, Scott W. Carnahan and Frank P. Willey, each for a term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders;

·FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and

·FOR the approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation.

May I revoke my proxy and change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote before it is taken at the Meeting by (1) delivering a written notice of revocation to the attention of our Secretary at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, (2) delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or (3) attending the Meeting and voting in person. As noted above, if you own your shares through a brokerage account or in another nominee form, you cannot vote in person at the Meeting unless you obtain a proxy from your broker or nominee and bring that proxy to the Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

It means that your shares may be registered differently and in more than one account. Sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.

How are votes counted?

You may either vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each nominee for the Board. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 and the proposal to approve, by non-binding vote, our executive compensation. An abstention is the voluntary act of not voting by a shareholder who is present at a meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.

If you submit your proxy but abstain from voting or withhold authority to vote on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as present at the Meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular proposal with respect to which you abstained from voting or withheld authority to vote. However, because an abstention is not counted as a vote cast, if you abstain from voting on a proposal, your abstention will have no effect on the proposal in question.Qualifications

 

 

 

3

If you hold your shares in “street name” and do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. Under NYSE rules, brokers that hold our common shares in street name for customers that are the beneficial owners of those shares may not give a proxy to vote those shares on certain matters, including the election of our Trustees and the approval, on a non-binding basis, of our executive compensation, without specific instructions from those customers. When a broker lacks authority to vote under these circumstances, this is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be counted as present at the Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be considered votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on any proposal to be considered at the Meeting.

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will count the votes for shares held in “street name” and the votes of shareholders of record. Representatives of our Company will serve as the Inspector of Elections.

How will we solicit proxies for the Meeting?

We are soliciting proxies from our shareholders by mailing the Notice and providing internet access, at www.proxyvote.com, to our Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders, and proxy card or voting instruction form. In addition, some of our Trustees and officers may make additional solicitations by telephone or in person.

Who bears the cost of soliciting proxies?

We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including preparing and mailing the Notice. To the extent any of our Trustees or officers solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile transmission or other personal contact, such persons will receive no additional compensation. Brokerage houses and other nominees, fiduciaries and custodians who are holders of record of common shares will be requested to forward proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of such shares and will be reimbursed by us for their charges and expenses in connection therewith at customary and reasonable rates.

Can I access the Company’s proxy materials and Annual Report to Shareholders electronically?

This Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, or Fiscal 2015, are available at www.proxyvote.com and in the SEC Filings section of our Investor Relations website, www.pennymac-reit.com.

Will our external manager be present at the Meeting?

Officers of PNMAC Capital Management, LLC, our external manager, or our Manager, will be present at the Meeting.

When are shareholder proposals due for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

No shareholder proposals were received by us to be presented at the Meeting. We intend to hold next year’s annual meeting of shareholders on approximately the same date as the Meeting. Accordingly, if you are submitting a proposal for possible inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, we must receive the proposal no later than December 8, 2016. If you are submitting a proposal for possible inclusion in next year’s proxy statement other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, we must receive the proposal no earlier than November 8, 2016 and no later than December 8, 2016.

Who can help answer my questions?

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need additional copies of this Proxy Statement or the proxy card, you should contact:

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
Attention: Investor Relations
3043 Townsgate Road
Westlake Village, California 91361
Phone: (818) 224-7028
Email:investorrelations@pnmac.com

4

OUR TRUSTEES

We have three classes of Trustees. If our Class I Trustees are elected at this year’s Meeting, they will serve until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2019 and their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our Class II Trustees will serve until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2017 and their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our Class III Trustees will serve until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2018 and their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

The following paragraphs provide the name and age (as of April 7, 2016) of each Trustee, as well as each Trustee’s business experience over the last five years or more. Immediately following the description of each Trustee’s business experience is a description of the particular experience, skills and qualifications that were instrumental in the Nominating and Governance Committee’s determination that the Trustee should serve on our Board.LOGO

 

Name
LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement  AgePosition3


Stanford L. Kurland 63Trustee, Chairman of the Board
David A. Spector53Trustee
Scott W. Carnahan62Trustee
Preston DuFauchard59Trustee
Randall D. Hadley72Independent Lead Trustee
Clay A. Halvorsen56Trustee
Nancy McAllister56Trustee
Stacey D. Stewart52Trustee
Frank P. Willey62Trustee

 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

 

Trustee Nominees

Class I Trustees – Term to Expire in 2019

Scott W. Carnahan. Mr. Carnahan, age 62, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Mr. Carnahan has served as senior managing director at FTI Consulting, Inc., a global business advisory firm, since May 2014. Prior thereto, Mr. Carnahan had provided financial and accounting consulting services to various financial institutions since April 2007. From 1992 to 1998 and from 2000 to March 2007, Mr. Carnahan was an audit and consulting partner at the professional services firm of KPMG LLP. Mr. Carnahan holds a BA and an MBA from the University of California, Irvine and is a CPA. We believe Mr. Carnahan is qualified to serve on our Board because he has both accounting and financial expertise, due to his experience at KPMG LLP, as well as a fundamental understanding of the mortgage lending business.

Frank P. Willey. Mr. Willey, age 62, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Since February 2009, Mr. Willey has been a non-equity partner at the law firm of Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP. From 1984 to January 2009, Mr. Willey held a variety of executive positions, including president and general counsel, at Fidelity National Financial, Inc., or Fidelity, a provider of title insurance, specialty insurance, claims management services and information services. Mr. Willey currently serves as a director of Fidelity, where he is vice chairman, and Winter Sports, Inc., a ski resort operator. Mr. Willey holds a BS from LeMoyne College and a JD from Albany Law School. We believe Mr. Willey is qualified to serve on our Board because he is an experienced executive and director with a strong business and legal background in the financial services industry.

Continuing Trustees

Class II Trustees – Term to Expire in 2017

Preston DuFauchard. Mr. DuFauchard, age 59, has been a member of our Board since November 2012. Mr. DuFauchard is currently retired. From 2006 through December 2011, Mr. DuFauchard served as the commissioner of the California Department of Corporations. From 1997 to 2006, Mr. DuFauchard was employed at Bank of America Corporation, a diversified financial services firm, where he held the title of assistant general counsel. Mr. DuFauchard holds a BA from Stanford University and a JD from the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt School of Law. We believe Mr. DuFauchard is qualified to serve on our Board because of his strong business experience and leadership as the chief executive officer of a state agency, his extensive legal and regulatory background, and his understanding of the mortgage banking business.2023 Business Highlights(1)

 

 

 

5

 

Nancy McAllister. Ms. McAllister, age 56, has been a member of our Board since November 2012. Ms. McAllister has served as a senior advisor of Star Mountain Capital, LLC and Star Mountain Stimulus Fund, L.P., private equity firms that invest in small and medium size businesses, since April 2013. From November 2008 through May 2011, Ms. McAllister served as a managing director inLOGO

Stronger returns to shareholders compared to the financial institutions group of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, a diversified financial services firm. From 1991 to September 2008, Ms. McAllister was employed by Lehman Brothers, Inc., where she held a variety of executive positions, including managing director and co-head of the depository institutions and debt capital markets groups. Ms. McAllister has served on the board of directors of People’s United Financial, Inc., a diversified financial services company, since September 2013. Ms. McAllister holds a BA from the University of Virginia. We believe Ms. McAllister is qualified to serve on our Board because she is a seasoned business executive with deep knowledge of the capital markets and significant experience in financial services, including investment banking.

broader mortgage REIT industry

 

Stacey D. Stewart. Ms. Stewart, age 52, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Since June 2009, Ms. Stewart has served in a variety of executive positions, including president of United States operations and executive vice president for Community Impact Leadership and Learning, at United Way Worldwide, the world’s largest charitable organization. From February 2007 to April 2009, Ms. Stewart was a senior vice president of Fannie Mae, a government-sponsored enterprise that supports liquidity and stability in the secondary mortgage market. Ms. Stewart holds an AB from Georgetown University and an MBA from the University of Michigan. We believe Ms. Stewart is qualified to serve on our Board because of her strong experience in the mortgage sector and proven leadership of charitable organizations, the primary focus of which is housing and homeownership within underprivileged communities.

Class III Trustees – Term to Expire in 2018

Randall D. Hadley. Mr. Hadley, age 72, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Mr. Hadley is also our Independent Lead Trustee. Mr. Hadley was a CPA and partner of Grant Thornton LLP, an accounting firm, including nine years as regional director of professional standards, before retiring in July 2003. He advised both public and private entities while at Grant Thornton LLP and provided various consulting services to the accounting firm following his retirement through July 2011. Mr. Hadley holds a BS from Wright State University. We believe Mr. Hadley is qualified to serve on our Board because he is a financial and accounting expert with over 35 years of wide-ranging accounting and auditing experience, including extensive experience in mortgage banking.

Clay A. Halvorsen. Mr. Halvorsen, age 56, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Mr. Halvorsen is currently senior vice president and general counsel of The Irvine Company, a diversified real estate firm, where he has served since February 2010, and he also holds the position of general counsel at Irvine Community Development Company, a residential real estate developer. From 1998 until February 2009, Mr. Halvorsen was the executive vice president, general counsel and secretary of Standard Pacific Corp., a NYSE listed homebuilding company. Mr. Halvorsen holds a BA from California State University, Northridge and a JD from the University of Southern California. We believe Mr. Halvorsen is qualified to serve on our Board because he is a longtime legal executive in the real estate, homebuilding and mortgage businesses with considerable experience advising publicly-traded institutions.

Stanford L. Kurland. Mr. Kurland, age 62, has been a member of our Board since our formation in May 2009 and has served as Chairman of the Board since May 2009. Mr. Kurland is also our Chief Executive Officer. He also has been the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc., or PFSI, since February 2013 and the Chief Executive Officer of Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC, or PNMAC, since May 2013, and, prior thereto, served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since founding the company in January 2008. Prior to the formation of PNMAC, Mr. Kurland served as a director and, from January 1979 to September 2006, held several executive positions, including president, chief financial officer and chief operating officer, at Countrywide Financial Corporation, or Countrywide, a diversified financial services company. Mr. Kurland holds a BS from California State University, Northridge. We believe Mr. Kurland is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience as our Chief Executive Officer and as an accomplished financial services executive with more than 35 years of experience in the mortgage banking arena.

David A. Spector. Mr. Spector, age 53, has been a member of our Board since our formation in May 2009. Mr. Spector is also our President and Chief Operating Officer. He also has been the President and Chief Operating Officer of PFSI since February 2013 and the President and Chief Operating Officer of PNMAC since March 2015. Mr. Spector was President and Chief Investment Officer of PNMAC from January 2008 to March 2015. Prior to joining PNMAC, Mr. Spector was co-head of global residential mortgages for Morgan Stanley, a global financial services firm, based in London. Before joining Morgan Stanley in September 2006, Mr. Spector was the senior managing director, secondary marketing, at Countrywide, where he was employed from May 1990 to August 2006. Mr. Spector holds a BA from the University of California, Los Angeles. We believe Mr. Spector is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as an experienced executive with broad mortgage banking expertise in portfolio investments, interest rate and credit risk management, and capital markets activity that includes pricing, trading and hedging.LOGO

 

 

(1) 6

For complete information regarding our 2023 financial performance, shareholders should read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, which was filed with the SEC on February 22, 2024 and is being made available to shareholders with this Proxy Statement as a part of our 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE,
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

Corporate Governance

We believe that we have implemented effective corporate governance policies and observe good corporate governance procedures and practices. We have adopted a number of written policies, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit and Compliance Committee, Compensation Committee, Finance Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Related Party Matters Committee.These documents are available in the Corporate Governance section of our website, www.pennymac-reit.com, and copies will be provided free of charge to any shareholder who sends a written request to Investor Relations, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361.

Independence of Our Trustees

The NYSE rules require that at least a majority of our Trustees be independent of our Company and management. The rules also require that our Board affirmatively determine that there are no material relationships between a Trustee and us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) before such Trustee can be deemed independent. We have adopted independence standards consistent with NYSE rules and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Our Board has reviewed both direct and indirect transactions and relationships that each of our Trustees has or had with us and our management.

As a result of this review, our Board, based upon the fact that certain of our non-management Trustees do not have any material relationships with us other than as Trustees and holders of our common shares, affirmatively determined that seven of our Trustees are independent Trustees under NYSE rules. Our independent Trustees are Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard, Hadley, Halvorsen and Willey and Mmes. McAllister and Stewart.

Board of Trustees Leadership Structure and Independent Lead Trustee

The positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently held by Mr. Kurland, and we have determined not to separate the positions at this time. This determination is based, in part, on our belief that independent Trustees and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. Our independent Trustees bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside our Company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings company-specific experience and expertise. We believe our Chief Executive Officer is thus better situated to serve as Chairman of the Board because he is able to utilize the in-depth focus and perspective gained in running our Company to effectively and efficiently lead our Board. As the Trustee most familiar with our business and industry, he is most capable of identifying new initiatives and businesses, strategic priorities and other critical and/or topical agenda items for discussion by our Board and then leading the discussion to ensure our Board’s proper oversight of these issues. Our Board believes that the combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy development and execution, and facilitates information flow between management and our Board, all of which are essential to effective governance.

This determination is also based on what we consider to be a strong governance structure already in place, including the appointment of an influential Independent Lead Trustee with a strong voice. The Independent Lead Trustee works with our Chairman of the Board and other Trustees to provide informed, independent oversight of our management and affairs. Among other things, the Independent Lead Trustee reviews and provides input on Board meeting agendas and materials, coordinates with committee chairs to ensure the committees are fulfilling the responsibilities set forth in their respective charters, serves as the principal liaison between our Chairman of the Board and the independent Trustees, and chairs an executive session of the independent Trustees at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Our Board has appointed Mr. Hadley as Independent Lead Trustee for a three (3) year term that expires in February 2017. Each of our Board committees is comprised of independent Trustees.

Together, our Chairman of the Board and the Independent Lead Trustee provide leadership to and work with our Board to define its structure and activities in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.

(2) 7

Assumes $100 invested in PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. common shares and other stock market indices. The graph above displays certain information comparing the cumulative total return on our common shares to the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and the Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index. The comparison period is from December 31, 2020, to December 31, 2023, and the calculation assumes reinvestment of any dividends.

The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

Our Board and each of its committees have an active role in overseeing our risk management process, while supporting organizational objectives, improving long-term organizational performance and creating shareholder value. A fundamental part of risk management oversight is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for our Company. The involvement of the full Board in our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for our Company. While our Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, particularly with respect to credit risk, interest rate risk, market risk, operational risk and other risks specific to the mortgage and real estate investment trust, or REIT, sectors, the committees of our Board also share responsibility for overseeing risk management. For example, the Audit and Compliance Committee focuses on compliance, financial and accounting risk, including internal controls, and receives an annual risk assessment report from our internal auditors. The Finance Committee focuses on risks relating to our Company’s liquidity and capital resources. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focuses on risks associated with proper board governance, including the independence of our Trustees and the assessment of the performance and effectiveness of each member and Committee of our Board. The Related Party Matters Committee focuses on risks arising out of potential conflicts of interest between our Company and our Manager and PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, or our Servicer. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee reports about the nature of all such risks.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth the basic principles and guidelines for resolving various legal and ethical questions that may arise in the workplace and in the conduct of our business. This code is applicable to all of our officers and Trustees, as well as to the employees, officers and directors of our Manager and our Servicer when such individuals are acting for or on our behalf.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which, in conjunction with the charters and key practices of the committees of our Board, provide the framework for the governance of our Company.

Corporate Sustainability

We strive to encourage and support principles of corporate sustainability in our operations, thereby promoting the long-term success of our organization for the benefit of our shareholders and customers and improving the environment in which we live. Although we have not yet established a formal corporate sustainability program, we hold ourselves and our Manager accountable for managing our social, environmental, and economic impact through a number of initiatives. Our Manager seeks to operate its buildings in an environmentally sustainable manner by investing in sustainable products and services and focusing on energy efficiency and conservative water consumption practices. Our Manager also seeks to recruit, develop and promote an exceptional workforce that represents diverse backgrounds and varied experiences and it has partnered with a third party to establish a comprehensive, fully integrated wellness program. We believe that every small effort is a step in the right direction, and we are confident that our and our Manager’s corporate sustainability initiatives have made and will continue to make a positive impact both in and beyond our business.

Committee Charters

Our Audit and Compliance Committee, Compensation Committee, Finance Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Related Party Matters Committee have also adopted written charters that govern their conduct.

Committees of the Board of Trustees

Audit and Compliance Committee

Our Board has established an Audit and Compliance Committee, formerly known as the Audit Committee, which is comprised of three independent Trustees, Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard and Hadley. Mr. Hadley chairs the Audit and Compliance Committee, and he and Mr. Carnahan each serve as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined by the SEC. Each of the members of the Audit and Compliance Committee is “financially literate” under the rules of the NYSE. The Audit and Compliance Committee assists our Board in overseeing:

8

 

4·our accounting and financial reporting processes; LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


·the integrity and audits of our financial statements;

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

·our internal control function;

·our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements;

·the effectiveness of our compliance program;

·the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and

·the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal auditors.

 

The AuditCorporate Governance

Trustee Qualification, Board Refreshment and Compliance Committee is also responsible for the engagement, retention and compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and permissible non-audit fees, and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.

Our Board has determined that all of the Trustees serving on the Audit and Compliance Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. The activities of the Audit and Compliance Committee are described in greater detail below under the caption “Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee.”

Compensation Committee

Our Board has established a Compensation Committee, which is comprised of three independent Trustees, Mmes. McAllister and Stewart and Mr. Willey. Mr. Willey chairs the Compensation Committee, the principal functions of which are to:

·evaluate the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;

·adopt and administer the compensation policies, plans and benefit programs for our executive officers and all other members of our executive team;

·recommend to the Board the compensation for our independent Trustees; and

·administer the issuance of any securities under the PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.

Our Board has determined that all of the Trustees serving on the Compensation Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. For additional information on the Compensation Committee, please see the section below entitled “Report of the Compensation Committee.”

Finance Committee

Our Board has established a Finance Committee, which is comprised of Messrs. DuFauchard and Carnahan and Ms. McAllister. Ms. McAllister chairs the Finance Committee, the principal function of which is to oversee the financial objectives, policies, procedures and activities of our Company, including a review of our capital structure, sources of funds, liquidity and financial position. In connection with these responsibilities of the Finance Committee, its principal functions are to:

·review our capital structure, liquidity, capital adequacy and reserves;

·review and assess our capital raising initiatives;

·monitor our liquidity management;

·review our short- and long-term investment strategy, investment policies and the performance of our investments;

·monitor our capital budget; and

·review our policies and procedures on derivatives transactions.

9

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Board has established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is comprised of three independent Trustees, Messrs. Halvorsen and Willey and Ms. Stewart. Ms. Stewart chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is responsible for seeking, considering and recommending to the full Board qualified candidates for election as Trustees and then recommending nominees for election as Trustees at the annual meeting of shareholders. It also periodically prepares and submits to our Board for adoption the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s selection criteria for Trustee nominees. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our Board and our corporate governance, and annually recommends to our Board nominees for each of its committees. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for annually facilitating the assessment of the performance of the individual committees and our Board as a whole and reporting thereon to our Board.Selection Criteria

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for developing the general criteria, subject to approval by the full Board, for use in identifying, evaluating and selecting qualified candidates for election or re-election to our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews with our Board the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members in the context of the current composition of our Board. Final approval of Trusteetrustee candidates is determined by the full Board, and invitations to join our Board are extended by our Chairman of the Board on behalf of the entire Board.

In March 2023, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board determined that Doug Jones should be elected as a trustee because of his many contributions to the growth and success of the Company since he joined the Company’s executive management team in 2012. In addition, as a trustee, his deep understanding of the mortgage banking industry combined with his operational experience and success in executing its business strategies will benefit our Board, the Company and its stakeholders. On April 17, 2023, Marianne Sullivan announced her intention to step down from the Board effective June 1, 2023, and on April 19, 2023, the Board elected Donna M. Corley as an independent Class I trustee effective as of June 1, 2023. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board determined that Ms. Corley should be elected as a trustee because of her leadership and operational experience at Freddie Mac where she was responsible for client relationships, asset acquisitions, managing credit and servicing performance, compliance and operational risks of a nearly $3 trillion portfolio of mortgage assets. In addition, Ms. Corley is an experienced financial services executive with a strong background in mortgage operations, financial and risk management and extensive regulatory experience. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not retain an independent third party to assist in identifying Mr. Jones or Ms. Corley.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, seeks to create a board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has skills and experience with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, risk management, corporate governance, and knowledge of the mortgage and REIT sectors and the global markets. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also focuses on issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, racerace/ethnicity and national origin, education, professional experience, and differences in viewpoints and skills. We do not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, our Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that it is essential that our Trusteestrustees represent diverse viewpoints and backgrounds. In considering candidates for our Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards and in light of the needs of our Board and our Company at that time, given the then current mix of Trusteetrustee attributes. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers a candidate’s accessibility and availability to serve effectively on our Board, and it conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of potential candidates. With respect to the nomination of continuing Trusteestrustees for re-election, the individual’s past contributions to our Board are also considered.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for Trustee.trustee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the appropriate size of our Board and whether any vacancies on our Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that a vacancy is anticipated, or otherwise arises, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers whether to fill any such vacancy and, if so, identifies various potential candidates for Trustee.trustee. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year. In evaluating such nominations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on our Board.

Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current members of our Board, professional search firms or other persons. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider recommendations for nominees properly submitted by our shareholders. These recommendations should be submitted in writing to our Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361. If any materials are provided by a shareholder in connection with a recommendation for a Trusteetrustee nominee, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Following verification of the shareholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in the same manner as other recommendations, at its next regularly scheduled or special meeting.

 

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement5


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Independence of Our Trustees

The New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, rules require that at least a majority of our trustees be independent of our Company and management. The rules also require that our Board affirmatively determine that there are no material relationships between a trustee and us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) before such trustee can be deemed independent. We have adopted independence standards consistent with NYSE and SEC rules. Our Board has reviewed both direct and indirect transactions and relationships that each of our trustees has or had with us and our management.

As a result of this review, our Board, based upon the fact that none of our non-management trustees have any material relationships with us other than as trustees and holders of our common shares, affirmatively determined that 80% of our current trustees are independent trustees under NYSE rules. Our independent trustees in Fiscal 2023 were Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard and Hadley and Mmes. Corley, Lynch, McAllister, Schultz, Sullivan and Stewart.

Board of Trustees Leadership and Independent Lead Trustee

Our Chairman and the independent lead trustee provide leadership to and work with our Board to define its structure and activities in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. The Board determined in March 2024 that the position of Chairman of the Board should continue to be held by David A. Spector. Mr. Spector has served as a key executive since our formation in 2009 and through our growth into one of the leading public mortgage REITs. The Board believes Mr. Spector’s past experience has made him uniquely positioned to lead and oversee the Board and identify and execute our future strategic initiatives. In addition, Mr. Spector has proven himself capable of leading Board discussions on new initiatives and strategic priorities, facilitating internal Board communication and ensuring proper Board oversight of key issues.

This determination is based, in part, on our belief that independent trustees and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. Our independent trustees bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside our Company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings company-specific experience and expertise. We believe our Chief Executive Officer is thus better situated to serve as Chairman of the Board because he is able to utilize the in-depth focus and perspective gained in running our Company to effectively and efficiently lead our Board. As the trustee most familiar with our business and industry, he is capable of identifying new initiatives and businesses, strategic priorities and other critical and/or topical agenda items for discussion by our Board and then leading the discussion to ensure our Board’s proper oversight of these issues. Our Board believes that the combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy development and execution, and facilitates information flow between management and our Board, all of which are essential to effective governance.

This determination is also based on what we consider to be a strong governance structure already in place, including the appointment of an influential independent lead trustee with a strong voice. The independent lead trustee works with our Chairman of the Board and other trustees to provide informed, independent oversight of our management and affairs. Among other things, the independent lead trustee reviews and provides input on Board meeting agendas and materials, coordinates with committee chairs to ensure the committees are fulfilling the responsibilities set forth in their respective charters, serves as the principal liaison between our Chairman of the Board and the independent trustees, and chairs an executive session of the independent trustees at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. On March 19, 2024, the independent trustees of our Board re-elected Preston DuFauchard as our independent lead trustee for an additional three year term.

Succession Planning

Our Board oversees management’s succession plan for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other key positions at the executive officer level. Our Board annually reviews succession plans for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and executive management. In addition, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer annually provides to our Board his assessment of executive leaders and their potential to succeed at key executive management positions.

Trustee Education

New trustees receive an orientation upon joining the Board, including the opportunity to meet with members of management, which is designed to familiarize new trustees with the Company’s purpose, business, operations, strategic direction, financial matters, risk management, corporate governance practices and other key policies and practices. The Board also believes in the importance of continuing

6 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

trustee education to enhance the performance of the Board and its committees. All trustees are offered membership with the National Association of Corporate Directors, a nationally recognized organization providing corporate governance and director and trustee education. In addition, trustees receive ongoing internal education from management and the Company’s advisors on matters relevant to the Company’s business, industry trends and developments, corporate governance and other appropriate subjects to assist the trustees in discharging their duties.

The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

Our senior management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining an effective and appropriate approach for managing enterprise risk. Our Board and each of its committees, and in particular the Audit and Risk Committees, have an active role in overseeing our enterprise risk management process, while supporting organizational objectives, improving long-term organizational performance and creating shareholder value. A fundamental part of risk management oversight is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for our Company. The involvement of the full Board in determining our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for our Company.

Our Board encourages senior management to promote a culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. Our Board continually works, with the input of the Company’s senior management, to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk. While our Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, particularly with respect to those risks inherent in the operation of our businesses, the committees of our Board also share responsibility for overseeing specific areas of risk management as follows:

Committee

Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee focuses on risks associated with internal controls and securities, financial and accounting compliance, and receives an annual risk assessment report from our internal auditors. The Audit Committee also discusses with management the Company’s major risk exposures and the framework management has established to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee focuses on oversight of our compensation policies and practices, including whether such policies and practices balance risk taking and rewards in an appropriate manner that is in alignment with shareholder interests and does not encourage excessive risk taking.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee focuses on risks relating to our Company’s liquidity and capital resources and our investment policies and strategies.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focuses on risks associated with proper board governance, including the independence of our trustees and the assessment of the performance and effectiveness of each member and Board committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has specific oversight responsibility for risks relating to our corporate sustainability policies, practices and initiatives, including human capital management, community involvement, corporate governance and stakeholder reports.

Related Party Matters Committee

The Related Party Matters Committee focuses on risks arising out of potential conflicts of interest including between us, on the one hand, and PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (“PFSI”), on the other hand. We are managed by PNMAC Capital Management, LLC (our “Manager”), a registered investment adviser and subsidiary of PFSI. In addition, our loan production and servicing activities are performed by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (our “Servicer”), a subsidiary of PFSI.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement7


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Committee

Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee oversees our enterprise risk management function in relation to our business activities and focuses on credit risk, mortgage compliance risk, environmental and climate risk and operational risk, including cybersecurity and data privacy risk. The Risk Committee, as well as other members of the Board, receive updates from the Company’s Chief Information Officer on the overall cybersecurity and data privacy risk environment including our enterprise-wide cybersecurity risk assessment results and key initiatives.

While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee reports about the nature of all such risks.

The Role of the Board in Cybersecurity

Our Board oversees our cybersecurity risks by periodically evaluating cybersecurity reports from senior management, including the Chief Information Officer and the Chief Information Security Officer, as well as reports from the Board committees and third-party consultants. The Risk Committee oversees our enterprise risk management framework, including risk and controls associated with data security, cybersecurity, IT infrastructure, and data privacy. The Audit Committee oversees the internal and external auditors’ review of the effectiveness of our controls to mitigate cybersecurity risks.

Committees of the Board of Trustees

Our Board has determined that all ofestablished six principal committees: the Trustees serving onAudit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC.

10

Related Party Matters Committee

Our Board has established a Related Party Matters Committee, which is comprised of Messrs. Carnahan, Hadley, Halvorsen and Willey. Mr. Carnahan chairs the Related Party Matters Committee and the principal function of which is toreview and approve certain transactions, and resolve other potential conflicts of interest, between our Company and any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and our Manager, Servicer and their affiliates, on the other hand. Among other matters, the Related Party Matters Committee reviews and approves our material agreements with our Manager and Servicer, including our management agreement, servicing agreement, mortgage banking and warehouse services agreement, MSR recapture agreement, master spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreements, reimbursement agreement, and any amendments of or extensions to such agreements. During 2013, the Related Party Matters Committee engaged Mr. Joseph Sturtevant as its outside independent consultant. In such role, Mr. Sturtevant provides the Related Party Matters Committee with financial consulting relating to, and monitoring and analysis of, our various fee arrangements and related party transactions with PNMAC and its subsidiaries.

Our Board has determined that all of the Trustees serving on the Related Party Matters Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC.

Ad Hoc Committees

Risk Committee. In addition to the standing committees described above, our Board may also establish ad hoc committees for limited periods of time in order to address particular matters. Our Board committees have also adopted written charters that govern their conduct, each of which is available on our website at pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com.

Board chairs and committee members are identified in the following table:

Trustee  Audit    Compensation    Finance  Nominating
and
Corporate
  Governance  
Related
Party
  Matters  
  Risk  
Non-Management Trustees
Scott W. CarnahanXXCC
Donna M. CorleyCCX
Preston DuFauchard*XXX
Randall D. HadleyCCX
Catherine A. LynchXXX
Nancy McAllisterXXCC
Renee R. SchultzCCXX
Stacey D. StewartXCC
Management Trustees
David A. Spector†
Doug Jones

† – Chairman of the Board

* – Independent Lead Trustee

CC – Committee Chair

8 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

The primary responsibilities, membership and meeting information for the Board committees are summarized below:

Audit Committee

Primary Responsibilities

Members:

The Audit Committee assists our Board in overseeing:

  our accounting and financial reporting processes;

  the integrity and audits of our financial statements;

  our internal control function;

  our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements;

  the effectiveness of our compliance programs as they relate to applicable laws and regulations governing securities, financial and accounting matters;

  the framework established to monitor major financial risk exposures, including risk assessment and risk management policies;

  the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and

  the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal auditors.

The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing an audit committee report to be included in our annual proxy statement, reviewing and discussing management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations to be included in our SEC filings, the engagement, retention and compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and permissible non-audit fees, and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.

Randall D. Hadley, Chair

Scott W. Carnahan

Catherine A. Lynch

Meetings in 2023: 12

Mr. Hadley, Mr. Carnahan and Ms. Lynch are each an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined by the SEC. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” under the rules of the NYSE.

Our Board has determined that all of the trustees serving on the Audit Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. For additional information on the Audit Committee, please see the section below entitled “Report of the Audit Committee.”

Compensation Committee

Primary Responsibilities

Members:

The principal functions of the Compensation Committee are to:

  evaluate the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;

  review and/or recommend to the Board the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;

  adopt and administer compensation policies, plans and benefit programs for our executive officers and all other members of our executive team;

  review and recommend to our Board compensation plans, policies and programs;

  prepare the Compensation Committee report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement;

  review and discuss our compensation discussion and analysis to be included in our annual proxy statement;

  recommend to our Board the compensation for our independent trustees;

  administer the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan adopted by shareholders;

The Compensation Committee may form, and delegate authority to, subcommittees when it deems appropriate to the extent permitted under applicable law.

Renee R. Schultz, Chair

Nancy McAllister

Stacey D. Stewart

Meetings in 2023: 4

Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Compensation Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. For additional information on the Compensation Committee, please see the section below entitled “Report of the Compensation Committee.”

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement9


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Finance Committee

Primary Responsibilities

Members:

The Finance Committee is responsible for overseeing the financial objectives, policies, procedures and activities of our Company, including a review of our capital structure, sources of funds, liquidity and financial position. In connection with these responsibilities of the Finance Committee, its principal functions are to:

  review, assess and monitor our capital structure, liquidity, capital adequacy and reserves;

  review and assess any policies we may establish from time to time that relate to our liquidity management, capital structure and dividend approvals;

  review our short- and long-term investment strategy, investment policies and the performance of our investments;

  review our mortgage loan sale and securitization activities;

  monitor our capital budget; and

  review our policies and procedures on hedges, swaps and other derivative transactions.

Donna M. Corley, Chair

Scott W. Carnahan

Nancy McAllister

Renee R. Schultz

Meetings in 2023: 4

Our Board has determined that all of the trustees serving on the Finance Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee

Primary Responsibilities

Members:

The principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to:

  seek, consider and recommend to the full Board qualified candidates for election as trustees and then recommend nominees for election as trustees at the annual meeting of shareholders;

  recommend to the Board individuals qualified to be appointed as our Company’s executive officers;

  periodically prepare and submit to our Board for adoption the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s selection criteria for trustee nominees;

  review and make recommendations to our Board on matters involving the general operation of our Board and our corporate governance guidelines;

  annually recommend to our Board nominees for each of its committees;

  annually assess our stock ownership guidelines;

  annually facilitate the assessment of the performance of the individual committees and our Board as a whole and reporting thereon to our Board; and

  oversee our policies, practices and initiatives regarding corporate sustainability.

Stacey D. Stewart, Chair

Preston DuFauchard

Catherine Lynch

Meetings in 2023: 4

Our Board has determined that all of the trustees serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

10 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Related Party Matters Committee

Primary Responsibilities

Members:

The principal functions of the Related Party Matters Committee are to:

  establish policies and procedures related to the identification and management of certain transactions, and resolve other potential conflicts of interest, between us and any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and our Manager, our Servicer and their affiliates, on the other hand;

  establish policies and procedures related to the identification of any other transactions in which certain related parties, including our trustees, executive officers and their family members, have a direct or indirect interest;

  oversee and administer all such policies; and

  review, approve and, if necessary, make recommendations to the Board regarding all such transactions, including, but not limited to, our management agreement, flow servicing agreement, mortgage banking services agreement, MSR recapture agreement, and mortgage loan purchase agreement with our Manager, our Servicer and their affiliates, and any amendments of or extensions to such agreements.

Since 2013, Mr. Joseph Sturtevant has been engaged by the Related Party Matters Committee as its outside independent consultant. In such role, Mr. Sturtevant provides the Related Party Matters Committee with financial consulting relating to, and monitoring and analysis of, our various fee arrangements and related party transactions with our Manager, our Servicer and their affiliates.

Scott W. Carnahan, Chair

Preston DuFauchard

Randall D. Hadley

Catherine A. Lynch

Renee Schultz

Meetings in 2023: 4

Our Board has determined that all of the trustees serving on the Related Party Matters Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

Risk Committee

Primary Responsibilities

Members:

The principal function of the Risk Committee is to assist our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: (i) our Company’s aggregate risk profile; (ii) specific risks expressly delegated to the Risk Committee, including credit risk, mortgage compliance risk, and operational risk; and (iii) the approach utilized by our Manager for assessing, monitoring and controlling such aggregate and specific risks. In carrying out its duties, the responsibilities of the Risk Committee include, but are not limited to, the following:

  reviewing, discussing and overseeing our Manager’s establishment and operation of its enterprise risk management (and any significant changes thereto) in relation to our Company;

  reviewing annually a schedule of all identified risks facing our Company and the alignment of such risks with our Manager’s management committees and committees of our Board;

  reviewing annually our Manager’s enterprise risk management policy;

  reviewing and overseeing credit risk, mortgage compliance risk, environmental and climate risk and operational risk (including regular reviews of risks arising from cybersecurity and data privacy), as well as the establishment and operation of policies and procedures and remediation for any deficiencies with respect to such specific risks; and

  directing our Manager to evaluate the effectiveness of its risk management.

Nancy McAllister, Chair

Preston DuFauchard

Donna M. Corley

Meetings in 2023: 4

Our Board has determined that all of the trustees serving on the Risk Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement11


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Board of Trustees and Committee Meetings

 

Communications with

During Fiscal 2023, our Board of Trustees

Our shareholders and other interested persons may communicate their concerns by sending written communicationsheld four meetings. All trustees are expected to the Board, committeesmake every effort to attend all meetings of the Board and individual Trustees (including our Independent Lead Trustee ormeetings of the independent/non-management Trustees as a group) by mailing those communications to:

Specified Addressee
c/o PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
3043 Townsgate Road
Westlake Village, California 91361
Email:investorrelations@pnmac.com
Attention: Investor Relations

These communicationscommittees of which they are sent by us directlymembers. Each trustee attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings held in Fiscal 2023 for the period during which such trustee served with respect to the specified addressee.

Attendance by Membersmeetings of our Board and each committee on which such trustee served.

Executive Sessions of the Independent Trustees

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our Board hold at least four regularly scheduled meetings each year and that our independent trustees meet in executive session without management on a regularly scheduled basis. These executive sessions, which are designed to promote unfettered discussions among our independent trustees, are presided over by the independent lead trustee, Mr. DuFauchard.

Board of Trustee Attendance at the 20152023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

We expect each member of the Board to attend our annual meetings of shareholders except for absences due to causes beyond the reasonable control of the Trustee.trustee. All current members of our Boardtrustees attended the 20152023 annual meeting of shareholders.

Board of Trustees and Committee MeetingsEvaluations

 

During Fiscal 2015, our Board held nine meetings. During such period,

The charters of each of the Audit and Compliance Committee, held eight meetings, the Compensation Committee, held four meetings, the Finance Committee, held four meetings,Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Related Party Matters Committee and Risk Committee require an annual performance evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual board assessment process and the implementation of the annual committee assessments. The performance evaluations may be conducted by the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings,or by engaging an external evaluator. The key areas of focus for the evaluation are Board operations, Board accountability and committee performance. The results of the evaluation are reviewed with each respective committee and the Related Party Mattersfull Board. Below is an example of a typical external board evaluation led by an external evaluator.

Commencement

EvaluationAnalysisFindingsFollow-Up
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair or external evaluator develops a comprehensive questionnaire to serve as the basis for the interview with each trustee.Questionnaires are distributed and the Chair or external evaluator interviews each trustee, soliciting feedback on the effectiveness of the Board and the trustees individually including on board size, compositions, board and committee structure and overall performance.The Chair or the external evaluator synthesizes the interview discussions and prepares a summary of findings and themes for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

The Chair or external evaluator presents findings and themes at a meeting of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which discusses such findings. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair then presents the findings to the Board.

Results requiring additional considerations are addressed at subsequent meetings and reported back to the Board, where appropriate.

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth the basic principles and guidelines for resolving various legal and ethical questions that may arise in the workplace and in the conduct of our business. This code is applicable to all of our employees (if any), officers and trustees.

In addition, we have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which sets forth specific policies to guide these individuals in the performance of their duties. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for the

12 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers are available on our website at pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com. Our employees (if any), officers and trustees are also encouraged to anonymously report suspected violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics through various means, including a toll-free hotline available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website at pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com, which, in conjunction with the charters and key practices of the committees of our Board, provide the framework for the governance of our Company. Pursuant to the majority voting standard in our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, our Board also amended and restated our Corporate Governance Guidelines to provide that if any nominee for trustee in an uncontested election fails to receive a majority vote for election or re-election, if so required, the trustee will promptly tender to the Board for its consideration his or her offer to resign from the Board.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement13


 CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

Corporate Sustainability Overview and Goals

Stakeholder Engagement

Our corporate sustainability approach starts with acknowledging that our stakeholders are the beneficiaries of our growth and success as an enterprise.

LOGO

Our DNA

Our core values and DNA are centered around being the most trusted partner to our stakeholders.

LOGO

14 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

Corporate Sustainability Priorities Aligned with our Strategic Objectives

With oversight from our Board and its various committees, we are committed to being responsive to our stakeholders as it relates to managing the impacts of our business activities and continuously improving our corporate sustainability and related disclosures. Our Board believes that it is important to establish a robust corporate sustainability program and framework that will support our corporate initiatives. This year, as part of our ongoing corporate sustainability program, we will publish another corporate sustainability report on our website with additional goals and industry-specific standards relevant to the mortgage finance industry. Our corporate sustainability report is prepared by our Senior Managing Director and Chief Human Resources Officer and our Managing Director, Corporate Sustainability. We maintain a corporate sustainability policy, which defines the framework requirements and governing platform for how we identify and manage corporate sustainability impacts of our operations in furtherance of our strategic plans.

Board and Management Oversight

Policies and Procedures

Monitoring and Evaluation

Sustainability Reporting

LOGO

We maintain a pay-for-performance culture but we also acknowledge that our core business centered on the essential public good of homeownership serves a broader purpose. Mortgage banking allows us to serve our customers throughout the country by facilitating home purchases, refinancings that make homes more affordable, and, when necessary, loss mitigation alternatives designed to avoid foreclosure and keep our customers and their families in their homes. We also encourage and support our corporate sustainability objectives through our Board governance, our employees and operations and through our community commitments. Corporate sustainability goals are included in our annual corporate strategic plan and are used to determine overall compensation, including variable pay, where applicable. Our corporate sustainability priorities promote our long-term growth that benefits all of our investors, employees, housing industry customers and other stakeholders. We hold ourselves accountable for managing the corporate sustainability impact of our business activities through a number of operational initiatives.

We and our Manager seek to operate our facilities in an environmentally sustainable manner that manages our impact on the environment by investing in sustainable products and services, committing to increased waste recycling, focusing on energy efficiency and engaging in conservative water consumption practices. We and our Manager are committed to environmental sustainability and energy conservation and recognize the importance of being a responsible steward of the environment.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement15


 CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

Corporate Sustainability and Board Committee held four meetings. Oversight

Our Board has established a set of principles, guidelines and practices that support sustainable financial performance and long-term value creation for our stakeholders supported by Board committee oversight:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Review of our overall corporate sustainability policies, practices and initiatives, including human capital management, community involvement, corporate governance and stakeholder reports.

Audit Committee

Review of our financial disclosures, as well as human capital disclosures in our SEC filings, and monitoring of regulatory developments pertaining to best practices in environmental and sustainability policies and disclosures.

Compensation Committee

Review of our proxy statement compensation disclosures, our corporate sustainability and human capital performance in determining compensation and managing talent and our Say-On-Pay voting results.

Risk Committee

Review of the physical environmental risks as well as risks related to transitioning to a low carbon economy that may impact properties that we own or that collateralize loans we own, or locations where we conduct operations.

Board Diversity

Five women serve as trustees representing 50% of our total Board members. In addition, we have three trustees who self-identify as representing underrepresented communities, including two trustees of African-American heritage and one trustee of gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender orientation. Our Board believes that diversity factors are important in promoting our long-term sustainable growth. Our Board maintains a policy regarding the evaluation of trustee candidates which states that the Board in its selection of trustee candidates will consider the overall Board balance of diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds and experiences. Our Board has also established trustee selection criteria which provides that the Board in its selection of trustee candidates will consider factors that contribute to Board diversity in the broadest sense, including gender, race/ethnicity, geography, education, and personal and professional experiences.

Workforce Diversity

All Trusteesof our senior officers are expectedemployees of PFSI or its affiliates and we had seven employees as of the end of Fiscal 2023. Our long-term growth and success is highly dependent upon PFSI’s employees and PFSI’s ability to maintain a diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace representing a broad spectrum of backgrounds, ideas and perspectives. As part of these efforts, PFSI strives to offer competitive compensation and benefits, foster a community where everyone feels a sense of belonging and purpose, and provide employees with the opportunity to give back and make an impact in the communities where we live and serve.

16 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

PFSI had approximately 3,900 domestic employees as of the end of Fiscal 2023. In addition, as of the end of Fiscal 2023, PFSI’s workforce was 51.8% female and 48.2% male, and the ethnicity of PFSI’s workforce was 44.3% White, 23.4% Hispanic or Latino, 14.2% Asian, 14.0% Black or African American and 4.1% other (which includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Two or More Races, and Not Specified as defined in its EE0-1 Report filed with the Department of Labor).

LOGO

Recruiting and Employee Retention

We and PFSI believe in attracting, developing and engaging the best talent, while providing a supportive work environment that prioritizes the health and safety of all. Talent development is a critical component of our and PFSI’s experience and ensures that employees have career growth opportunities, including establishing development networks and relationships and fostering continued growth and learning. Employees receive regular business and compliance training to help further enhance their career development objectives. PFSI also actively manages enterprise-wide and divisional mentoring programs and has partnered with an external vendor to establish a comprehensive, fully integrated wellness program designed to enhance employee productivity.

Compensation and Succession Planning

Our and PFSI’s compensation programs are designed to motivate and reward employees who possess the necessary skills to support our business strategy and create long-term value for our shareholders and other stakeholders. PFSI compensation may include base salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term equity incentives, as well as life insurance and 401(k) plan matching contributions. PFSI also offers a comprehensive selection of health and welfare benefits to its employees including emotional well-being support and paid parental leave programs. Succession planning is also critical to our operations and we have established ongoing evaluations of our leadership depth and succession capabilities, including Board review.

Workforce Culture

We and PFSI believe that building an equitable and inclusive, high-performing workforce where PFSI’s employees bring diverse perspectives and experiences to work every day creates a positive influence in PFSI’s workplace, community and business operations. Our Board and Board committees provide regular oversight of our and PFSI’s corporate sustainability program, including our diversity, equity and inclusion programs and initiatives. We and PFSI are also taking proactive measures to strategically and sustainably advance equity in the workplace through Business Resource Groups, or BRGs, diversity initiatives, mentorship programs, and external partnerships with organizations such as the Mortgage Bankers Association and the National Association of Minority Mortgage Bankers of America. We and PFSI also established leadership goals and created customized initiatives that focus on PFSI’s continued effort to attend all meetingsincrease the number of women and underrepresented communities in management positions throughout its business divisions. As it relates to PFSI’s inclusive culture, PFSI established the following BRGs to emphasize career growth, networking, and learning opportunities for employees and allies with shared backgrounds and experiences: the BOLD BRG (for our Black and African American employees and allies), the HOLA BRG (for our Hispanic, Latino and Latinx employees and allies), the InspirASIAN BRG (for Asian American and Pacific Islander employees and allies), the Pennymac PRIDE BRG (for LGBTQIA employees and allies), the SERVE BRG (for veteran and military family employees and allies), and the wEMRG BRG (for women employees and allies). We and PFSI also foster a more inclusive culture through a variety of initiatives, including corporate training, special events, community outreach and corporate philanthropy.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement17


 CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

Community Involvement

PFSI has a corporate philanthropy program that is governed by a philosophy of giving that prioritizes the support of causes and issues that are important in our local communities, and drives a culture of employee engagement and collaboration throughout our and PFSI’s organization. We and PFSI are committed to empowering our employees to be a positive influence in the communities where we live and serve, and believe that this commitment supports our efforts to attract and engage employees and improve retention. PFSI’s philanthropy program consists of three key components: an employee matching gift program, a charitable grants program and a corporate sponsorship program. PFSI’s five philanthropic focus areas are: community development and equitable housing, financial literacy and economic inclusion, human and social services, health and medical research, and environmental sustainability. PFSI has established a separate donor advised fund to facilitate donations to various local and national charitable organizations and has provided funding to several charitable organizations located near our office sites and national organizations that support missions such as sustainable homeownership, mortgage and rental assistance, food insecurity, disaster recovery, family and child advocacy, and community empowerment. We and PFSI also manage our environmental impact by focusing on improving our waste reduction, energy efficiency and water conservation.

Communications with our Board of Trustees

Our shareholders and other interested persons may send written communications to the Board, committees of the Board and meetingsindividual trustees (including our independent lead trustee or the independent/non-management trustees as a group) by mailing those communications to:

[Specified Addressee]

c/o PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust

3043 Townsgate Road

Westlake Village, California 91361

Email: investorrelations@pennymac.com

Attention: Investor Relations

Generally, these communications are sent by us directly to the specified addressee. Any communication that is primarily commercial, offensive, illegal or otherwise inappropriate, or does not substantively relate to the duties and responsibilities of our Board, may not be forwarded.

18 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

Proposal I – Election of Trustees

We have ten trustees. Doug Jones joined the Company as a Class III trustee on March 7, 2023. On April 17, 2023, Marianne Sullivan announced her intention to step down from the Board effective June 1, 2023. On April 19, 2023, the Board elected Donna M. Corley as an independent Class I trustee effective as of June 1, 2023. In addition, Randall A. Hadley is not standing for re-election. We are grateful to Ms. Sullivan and Mr. Hadley for their past services to the Company.

We have three classes of trustees. The Board has nominated David A. Spector, Doug Jones and Catherine A. Lynch for election as Class III trustees, and each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If our Class III trustees are elected at this year’s Annual Meeting, they will serve until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2027 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our Class I trustees will serve until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2025 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our Class II trustees will serve until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2026 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our Board is considered a staggered board, which means that our trustees are classified into three classes with staggered three-year terms.

Majority Voting Standard in an Uncontested Election of Trustees

Because this is considered an uncontested election under our Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, a nominee for trustee is elected to the Board if he or she receives a majority of the committeesvotes cast for his or her election, meaning the number of which theyshares voted for such nominee’s election exceeds the number of shares voted against such nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the election of trustees. In tabulating the voting results for the election of trustees, only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are members. Each Trustee attended at least 75%counted. If an incumbent trustee receives a greater number of votes against his or her election than votes for such election, such trustee shall tender his or her resignation as provided in our Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the aggregate numberBoard will then act on an expedited basis to determine whether to accept the trustee’s tendered resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board will consider any factors they deem relevant.

OUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR OUR TRUSTEE NOMINEES TO SERVE UNTIL OUR 2027 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND UNTIL THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS ARE DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFIED.

The following paragraphs provide the name, age and business experience of meetings held in Fiscal 2015 by our Boardeach trustee nominee up for election at the Annual Meeting and each committeecontinuing trustee up for election at our annual meeting of shareholders in 2025 or 2026. Immediately following the description of each trustee’s business experience is a description of the particular experience, skills and qualifications that were instrumental in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s determination that the trustee should serve on which such Trustee served.our Board.

 

Name

AgePosition

David A. Spector

61Chairman, Class III

Scott W. Carnahan

70Trustee, Class I

Donna M. Corley

50Trustee, Class I

Preston DuFauchard

67Independent Lead Trustee, Class II

Doug Jones

67Trustee, Class III

Catherine A. Lynch

62Trustee, Class III

Nancy McAllister

64Trustee, Class II

Renee R. Schultz

55Trustee, Class I

Stacey D. Stewart

60Trustee, Class II

Meetings of Non-Management and Independent Trustees

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement19


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our Board hold at least four regularly scheduled meetings each year and that our independentTrustee Nominees

Class III Trustees meet– Term to Expire in executive session without management on a regularly scheduled basis. These meetings, which are designed to promote unfettered discussions among our independent Trustees, are presided over by the Independent Lead Trustee, Mr. Hadley. During Fiscal 2015, our non-management Trustees, all of whom are independent, held six meetings in executive session.2024

 

 

11

 

DAVID A. SPECTOR

 

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers:

Name AgePosition Held with the Company
Stanford L. Kurland 63Trustee,

Mr. Spector has been a member of our Board since our formation in May 2009 and has been our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

David A. Spector53Trustee, Executive Managing Director, since February 2021 and prior thereto as our President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer since January 2017. He served as our executive managing director, president and chief operating officer from February 2016 through December 2016 and, prior thereto, as president and chief operating officer since May 2009. Mr. Spector has also served in a variety of similar executive positions at PFSI and its affiliates from its founding in January 2008. Prior to joining PFSI and its affiliates, Mr. Spector was co-head of global residential mortgages for Morgan Stanley, a global financial services firm, based in London. Before joining Morgan Stanley in September 2006, Mr. Spector was the senior managing director, secondary marketing, at Countrywide, where he was employed from May 1990 to August 2006. Mr. Spector holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles. We believe Mr. Spector is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience as a member of our executive management team and as an experienced executive with broad mortgage banking expertise in portfolio investments, interest rate and credit risk management, and capital markets activity that includes pricing, trading and hedging.

Steve Bailey

LOGO

 54

 Board Member Since:  2009

 Age: 61

 

DOUG JONES

Mr. Jones has been a member of our Board since March 2023 and has been our President and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer since March 2021. Prior thereto, he served as the Company’s Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage OperationsBanking Officer from January 2017, as well as in a number of key executive positions since 2012. Mr. Jones also serves as Director, President and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer of PFSI and has served in a variety of similar executive positions at PFSI and its affiliates since June 2011. Mr. Jones is responsible for all business activities relating to mortgage banking operations. Prior to joining PFSI and its affiliates, Mr. Jones worked in several executive positions, including senior vice president, mortgage banking at Countrywide (and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor) from 1997 until 2011, where he was responsible for managing and overseeing mortgage banking and correspondent and warehouse lending operations among other roles. Mr. Jones earned a B.A. in economics from California State University, Sacramento. We believe Mr. Jones is qualified to serve on our Board because he is an experienced mortgage banking executive with significant experience in the correspondent production and warehouse lending businesses.

Andrew S. Chang

LOGO

 38

 Board Member Since:  2023

 Age: 67

 Senior Managing Director and Chief Business Development Officer
Vandad Fartaj41Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer
Jeffrey P. Grogin55Senior Managing Director, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer and Secretary
Doug Jones59Senior Managing Director and Chief Institutional Mortgage Banking Officer
Anne D. McCallion61Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer
Daniel S. Perotti35Senior Managing Director and Chief Asset and Liability Management Officer
David M. Walker60Senior Managing Director and Chief Risk Officer

 

20 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement

Biographical information for Messrs. Kurland and Spector is provided above under the caption “Our Trustees.” Certain biographical information for the other executive officers is set forth below.


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

 

CATHERINE A. LYNCH

Ms. Lynch has been a member of our Board since April 2022. From 2003 to 2016, Ms. Lynch served in a variety of executive positions at the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust, including as its chief executive officer and chief investment officer from 2008 until her retirement in 2016. From 1999 to 2002, Ms. Lynch served as the first investment officer for the George Washington University endowment. Ms. Lynch serves as a board member and Audit chair for certain BlackRock fixed income mutual funds and also serves as the chair of the Investment Advisory Committee for the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Ms. Lynch holds a B.A. from Yale University and she earned the Chartered Financial Analyst credential in 1986. We believe Ms. Lynch is qualified to serve on our Board because she is a seasoned business executive with deep knowledge of investments and capital markets and significant experience in financial services, particularly in investment portfolio management.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2022

 Age: 62

Committees:

   Audit

   Nominating and Corporate Governance

   Related Party Matters

Steve Bailey.Mr. Bailey has been our Chief Mortgage Operations Officer since February 2016. Mr. Bailey served as our chief operations officer from February 2015Continuing Trustees

Class I Trustees – Term to February 2016, as our chief mortgage operations officer from May 2013 to February 2015 and, prior thereto, as our chief servicing officer from February 2012 to May 2013. Mr. Bailey also has servedas the chief operations officer of PNMAC from March 2015 to February 2016, as the chief mortgage operations officer of PNMAC from November 2013 to March 2015, and, prior thereto, served as the chief servicing officer of PNMAC since March 2011. Mr. Bailey is responsible for overseeing the servicing of our portfolio of mortgage loans and real estate acquired upon settlement of loans, including the implementation of the methods and programs directed at improving the value of acquired loans, as well as setting and managing performance goals for all aspects of the servicing and loan administration functions. Prior to joining PNMAC, Mr. Bailey servedExpire in a variety of executive and leadership positions withinCountrywide(and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor) from May 1985 until February 2010. Mr. Bailey is a seasoned mortgage executive with deep experience in loan servicing and administration.

Andrew S. Chang. Mr. Chang has been our Chief Business Development Officer since our formation in May 2009. Mr. Chang also has served as Chief Business Development Officer ofPNMAC since May 2008. Mr. Chang is responsible for our corporate development, portfolio acquisitions and investor relations, including communications with shareholders and the government-sponsored entities and other mortgage agencies. Prior to joiningPNMAC, from June 2005 to May 2008, Mr. Chang was a director at BlackRock, Inc., a global investment management firm, and a senior member in its advisory services practice, specializing in financial strategy and risk management for banks and mortgage companies. Mr. Chang is an experienced financial services executive with substantial experience in corporate finance and mortgage banking.

Vandad Fartaj. Mr. Fartaj has been our Chief Investment Officer since March 2010. Mr. Fartaj also has served as the Chief Capital Markets Officer of PNMAC since March 2010 and, prior thereto, as managing director, capital markets at PNMAC from April 2008 to March 2010. Mr. Fartaj is responsible for all capital markets and investment-related activities, including asset valuation, trading, hedging, secondary marketing, and risk management. Prior to joiningPNMAC, he was employed in a variety of positions, including vice president, whole loan trading, at Countrywide Securities Corporation, a broker-dealer, where he was employed from November 1999 to April 2008. Mr. Fartaj has substantial experience with respect to capital markets, mortgage-related investments, and interest rate risk and credit risk management.

Jeffrey P. Grogin. Mr. Grogin has been our Chief Administrative and Legal Officer, and Secretary since February 2012, and he previously served as our chief legal officer and secretary from the time of our formation in May 2009 to February 2012. Mr. Grogin also has served as the Chief Administrative and Legal Officer, and Assistant Secretary ofPNMAC since March 2015 and, prior thereto, as the chief administrative and legal officer, and secretary of PNMAC from September 2011 to March 2015, and as chief legal officer and secretary from January 2008 to September 2011. Mr. Grogin is responsible for overseeing our legal management and affairs, administration and human resources. Mr. Grogin is an owner of Snood, LLC, a computer games publisher, where he has served as president since 1999. Mr. Grogin has significant experience in real estate, mergers and acquisitions, securities, and mortgage banking law.2025

 

 

 

SCOTT W. CARNAHAN

 12

Mr. Carnahan has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Mr. Carnahan is a Senior Advisor to FTI Consulting, Inc., a global advisory firm, since April 2023 and had served as Senior Managing Director at FTI Consulting, Inc. from May 2014 through March 2023. Prior thereto, Mr. Carnahan had provided financial and accounting consulting services to various financial institutions since April 2007. From 1992 to 1998 and from 2000 to March 2007, Mr. Carnahan was an audit and consulting partner at the professional services firm of KPMG LLP. Mr. Carnahan holds a B.A. and an M.B.A. from the University of California, Irvine and is a CPA. We believe Mr. Carnahan is qualified to serve on our Board because he has both accounting and financial expertise, due to his experience at KPMG LLP, as well as a fundamental understanding of the mortgage lending business.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2009

 Age: 70

 

Committees:

   Audit

   Finance

   Related Party Matters (Chair)

 

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement21


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

DONNA M. CORLEY

Ms. Corley has been a member of our Board since June 2023. Ms. Corley served as Executive Vice President and Head of Single-Family Business at Freddie Mac from 2019 to 2022, where she was responsible for client relationships, asset acquisitions, managing credit and servicing performance, compliance and operational risks of a nearly $3 trillion portfolio of mortgage assets. Ms. Corley previously served as the Chief Risk Officer for Single-Family Business from 2014 to 2019, Senior Vice President of Credit Pricing, Risk Transfer and Securitization from 2011 to 2014, along with other roles during her 27 years at Freddie Mac. Ms. Corley serves as a board member of Bite Me Cancer since 2018, where she is the co-chair of their Operations Committee. Ms. Corley holds a B.S. in business administration from The American University and earned a Chartered Financial Analyst designation in 1999. We believe Ms. Corley is qualified to serve on our Board because she is an experienced financial services executive with a strong background in mortgage operations, financial and risk management and extensive regulatory experience.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2023

 Age: 50

Committees:

   Finance (Chair)

   Risk

RENEE R. SCHULTZ

Ms. Schultz has been a member of our Board since May 2021. Ms. Schultz served as senior vice president of capital markets at Fannie Mae from May 2012 to April 2021, where she managed Fannie Mae’s capital markets pricing and sales desk, credit risk transfer programs, structured transactions, and the whole loan conduit. She also oversaw the Fannie Mae securitization policy team, which ensures proper administration of matters related to the strategy and business value of Fannie Mae securities. Ms. Schultz served as vice president of capital markets at Fannie Mae from March 2006 to 2012, along with other leadership roles during her 22 years at Fannie Mae. Ms. Schultz is a former trustee at Saint Mary’s College Notre Dame, Indiana and the Board of Governors for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Martin and Palm Beach Counties. Ms. Schultz is a founding member and director of ALICE, a not-for-profit dedicated to the advancement of women in the mortgage finance industry. Ms. Schultz holds a B.A. from Saint Mary’s College, Notre Dame, Indiana. We believe Ms. Schultz is qualified to serve on our Board because she is an experienced executive with a strong background in capital markets and housing finance and extensive regulatory experience.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2021

 Age: 55

Committees:

   Compensation (Chair)

   Finance

   Related Party Matters

22 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

 

Doug Jones.Mr. Jones has been our Chief Institutional Mortgage Banking Officer since February 2015, and prior thereto, served as our chief correspondent lending officer from August 2011Class II Trustees – Term to February 2015. Mr. Jones also has served as the Chief Institutional Mortgage Banking Officer of PNMAC since March 2015 and, prior thereto, the chief correspondent lending officer of PNMAC from March 2012 to February 2015. Mr. Jones is responsible for all business activities and production within our correspondent production business. Prior to joiningPNMAC, Mr. Jones workedExpire in several executive positions, including senior managing director, correspondent lending, at Countrywide (and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor) from 1997 until 2011, where he was responsible for managing and overseeing Countrywide’s correspondent and warehouse lending operations. Mr. Jones is an experienced mortgage banking executive with significant experience in the correspondent production and warehouse lending businesses.2026

 

PRESTON DUFAUCHARD

Independent Lead Trustee

Mr. DuFauchard has been a member of our Board since November 2012. Mr. DuFauchard is also our independent lead trustee. Mr. DuFauchard served as the chief executive officer of West Oakland Health Council from August 2018 until 2021. From April 2016 until February 2017, he served as general counsel of Robertson Stephens, a global investment advisory firm for high net worth individuals, family offices, institutions and corporations. Prior thereto, Mr. DuFauchard had served as an independent consultant since January 2012. From 2006 through December 2011, Mr. DuFauchard served as the commissioner of the California Department of Corporations. From 1997 to 2006, Mr. DuFauchard was employed at Bank of America Corporation, a diversified financial services firm, where he held the title of assistant general counsel. Mr. DuFauchard currently serves on the board of directors of First Federal of San Rafael. Mr. DuFauchard holds a B.A. from Stanford University and a J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. We believe Mr. DuFauchard is qualified to serve on our Board because of his strong business experience and leadership as the chief executive officer of a state agency, his extensive legal and regulatory background, and his understanding of the mortgage banking business.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2012

 Age: 67

Committees:

   Nominating and Corporate
Governance

   Related Party Matters

   Risk

Anne D. McCallion. Ms. McCallion has been our Chief Financial Officer since our formation in May 2009 and also has been the Chief Financial Officer of PNMAC since May 2009. Ms. McCallion is responsible for overseeing our financial management, reporting and controls, and tax management. Prior to joining PNMAC, Ms. McCallion was employed by Countrywide (and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor), where she worked in a variety of executive positions, including deputy chief financial officer and senior managing director, finance, from 1991 to 2008. From January 2009 to March 2009, Ms. McCallion was an independent financial consultant. Ms. McCallion is a seasoned finance and accounting executive with considerable experience in the financial services industry and, more specifically, the mortgage banking sector.

NANCY MCALLISTER

Ms. McAllister has been a member of our Board since November 2012. Ms. McAllister has served as a senior advisor of Star Mountain Capital, LLC and Star Mountain Stimulus Fund, L.P., private equity firms that invest in small and medium size businesses, since April 2013. From November 2008 through May 2011, Ms. McAllister served as a managing director in the financial institutions group of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, a diversified financial services firm. From 1991 to September 2008, Ms. McAllister was employed by Lehman Brothers, Inc., where she held a variety of executive positions, including managing director and co-head of the depository institutions and debt capital markets groups. Ms. McAllister served on the board of directors of People’s United Financial, Inc., a diversified financial services company, from September 2013 until April 2022. Ms. McAllister holds a B.A. from the University of Virginia. We believe Ms. McAllister is qualified to serve on our Board because she is a seasoned business executive with deep knowledge of the capital markets and significant experience in financial services, including investment banking.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2012

 Age: 64

Committees:

   Compensation

   Finance

   Risk (Chair)

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement23


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

STACEY D. STEWART

Ms. Stewart has been a member of our Board since August 2009. Ms. Stewart has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) since January 2023. She has served as a board member of Hologic, Inc. since January 2023. From November 2016 to November 2022, she served as president of the March of Dimes, a leading nonprofit organization. From June 2009 to November 2016, Ms. Stewart served in a variety of executive positions, including president of United States operations and executive vice president for Community Impact Leadership and Learning, at United Way Worldwide, the world’s largest charitable organization. From February 2007 to April 2009, Ms. Stewart was a senior vice president of Fannie Mae, a government-sponsored enterprise that supports liquidity and stability in the secondary mortgage market. Ms. Stewart holds an A.B. from Georgetown University and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. We believe Ms. Stewart is qualified to serve on our Board because of her strong experience in the mortgage sector and proven leadership of charitable organizations, the primary focus of which is housing and homeownership within underprivileged communities.

LOGO

 Board Member Since: 2009

 Age: 60

Committees:

   Compensation

   Nominating and Corporate
Governance 
(Chair)

24 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

 

Daniel S. Perotti. Mr. Perotti has been our Chief Asset and Liability Management Officer since November 2013 and holds the same title at PNMAC, where he has served since October 2013. Prior thereto, Mr. Perotti served as managing director of financial analysis and valuation of PNMAC from July 2010 to October 2013. Mr. Perotti is responsible for oversight of balance sheets, analysis of realized and projected financial performance, and valuation of investment assets for us and certain affiliates. Prior to joining PNMAC in June 2008, Mr. Perotti was a vice president at BlackRock, Inc. and served as the head of the quantitative research team within its BlackRock Solutions business. Mr. Perotti has substantial experience in asset and liability management, financial analysis and valuation of assets.

David M. Walker. Mr. Walker has been our Chief Risk Officer since July 2015 and, prior thereto, served as our chief credit and enterprise risk officer from May 2013 to July 2015 and as our chief credit officer from the time of our formation in May 2009 to May 2013. Mr. Walker has also served as the Chief Risk Officer of PNMAC since July 2015 and, prior thereto, served as its chief credit and enterprise risk officer from November 2013 to July 2015, as its chief operating officer and chief credit officer from September 2011 to November 2013 and as its chief credit officer from the time of its formation in January 2008 to September 2011. Mr. Walker is responsible for enterprise risk management, credit risk management, mortgage compliance management, strategic planning and internal audit. From June 2002 to April 2007, Mr. Walker served in a variety of executive positions at Countrywide Bank, N.A., including chief credit officer and chief lending officer. From October 1992 to June 2002, Mr. Walker served in a variety of executive positions at Countrywide, including executive vice president of secondary marketing and managing director and chief credit officer. Mr. Walker is a seasoned financial services executive with significant experience in credit risk management.Non-Management Trustee Compensation

 

 

The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to our Board the form and level of trustee compensation and seeks outside advice from our independent compensation consultants on market practices when changes are contemplated.

Trustee compensation was reviewed in 2023 by our independent compensation consultant relative to certain peer companies and selected companies within the S&P 500 and Russell 3000 indexes and, in connection with such review, our independent compensation consultant recommended that an increase in compensation was warranted based on market studies. Accordingly, and in order to continue to recruit qualified trustee candidates, the Compensation Committee determined on August 23, 2023 to increase the base annual retainer by $5,000 and increase the equity retainer by $5,000.

The compensation program for our non-management trustees is intended to be competitive and fair so that we can attract the best talent to our Board, and recognize the time and effort required of a trustee given the size and complexity of our operations. In addition to cash compensation, we provide equity grants and have share ownership guidelines to align the trustees’ interests with our shareholders’ interests and to motivate our trustees to focus on our long-term growth and success. Any management trustee who is an executive officer of our Manager or its affiliates is not paid any fees for serving on our Board or for attending Board meetings.

The following table summarizes the annual retainer fees of our non-management trustees as of August 23, 2023.

Base Annual Retainer, all non-management trustees

  13$95,000  

Additional Base Annual Retainer, independent lead trustee

$30,000  

Base Annual Retainer, all non-management committee members:

 

Audit Committee

$7,750   

Compensation Committee

$7,750   

Finance Committee

$7,750   

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

$7,750   

Related Party Matters Committee

$7,750   

Risk Committee

$7,750   

Additional Annual Retainer, all committee chairs:

Audit Committee

$12,000   

Compensation Committee

$10,750   

Finance Committee

$10,750   

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

$10,750   

Related Party Matters Committee

$10,750   

Risk Committee

$12,000   

In addition, our trustees are eligible to receive certain types of equity-based awards under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, or 2019 Plan. During Fiscal 2023, each of Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard and Hadley and Mmes. Lynch, McAllister, Schultz, Stewart and Sullivan received a grant of 8,058 time-based restricted share units, or RSUs, on February 28, 2023 with a grant date fair value of approximately $105,000. Ms. Corley received a grant, prorated for her time in service to the Board during the year, of 6,547 time-based RSUs on June 1, 2023 with a grant date fair value of approximately $78,247.

Non-management trustee RSUs granted in Fiscal 2023 will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and entitle the recipient to receive any cash distributions during the vesting period. Prior to the vesting of an RSU, such RSU is generally subject to forfeiture upon termination of service to us. In addition, each independent trustee newly elected or appointed to our Board generally is entitled to receive a one-time initial RSU grant with a grant date fair value of approximately $105,000 in RSUs prorated for the portion of the annual equity award cycle for which the trustee served on the Board. Further, all members of our Board will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses in attending all meetings of our Board and its committees and certain other Company-related functions. The non-management trustee annual RSU grant was increased from $105,000 to $110,000 as of August 23, 2023.

 

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement25


 PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF TRUSTEES  

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIPPolicy Regarding Receipt of Shares in Lieu of Cash Trustee Fees. During 2014, our Board adopted a policy whereby non-management trustee fees may be paid in cash or common shares at the election of each non-management trustee. The number of common shares delivered in lieu of any cash payment of trustee fees will be equivalent in value to the amount of forgone trustee fees divided by the fair market value (as defined in our 2019 Plan) of a common share on the day on which the trustee fees otherwise would have been paid in cash to the non-management trustee, rounded down to the nearest whole share. None of our trustees has elected to be paid in common shares.

Accelerated Vesting. Prior to vesting, an RSU granted to a non-management trustee is generally subject to forfeiture upon termination of service to us if such termination is for cause. Upon a termination of service to us other than for cause, a change in control or the termination of our management agreement other than for cause (as defined in our management agreement), any RSU held by non-management trustees not previously vested may become fully or pro rata vested and settled in our common shares. The term of our management agreement expires on June 30, 2025, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

2023 Trustee Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the compensation earned by each non-management trustee who served on our Board for Fiscal 2023.

Name(1)

 

  

Fees Earned

or Paid

in Cash
($)
(2)

 

   

Stock
Awards
($)
(3)

 

   

Total
($)

 

 

Scott W. Carnahan

   125,780    105,000    230,780 

Donna M. Corley

   69,486    78,247    147,733 

Preston DuFauchard

   145,030    105,000    250,030 

Randall D. Hadley

   119,280    105,000    224,280 

Catherine A. Lynch

   111,794    105,000    216,794 

Nancy McAllister

   126,508    105,000    231,508 

Renee R. Schultz

   122,544    105,000    227,544 

Stacey D. Stewart

   118,030    105,000    223,030 

Marianne Sullivan

 

   

 

52,302

 

 

 

   

 

105,000

 

 

 

   

 

157,302

 

 

 

(1)

Mr. Spector, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Jones, our President and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer, are not included in this table as they are executive officers of our Company and do not receive any additional compensation for their board services. Please see the 2023 Summary Compensation Table below for additional information regarding the compensation paid to them in their capacities as our executive officers.

(2)

Reflects fees earned by the trustee in Fiscal 2023, whether or not paid in such year.

(3)

Reflects the full grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, of RSUs granted to Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard and Hadley and Mmes. McAllister, Schultz, Stewart and Sullivan on February 28, 2023 and Ms. Corley on June 1, 2023. For more information on the assumptions used in our estimates of value, please refer to Note 22—Share-Based Compensation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 22, 2024. As of December 31, 2023, Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard and Hadley and Mmes. McAllister, and Stewart each held 9,844 RSUs; Ms. Schultz held 9,364 RSUs; Ms. Lynch held 8,058 RSUs and Ms. Corley held 6,547 RSUs.

Non-Management Trustee Share Ownership Guidelines

Non-management trustees are subject to robust share ownership guidelines that require each such trustee to hold common shares and unvested RSUs with an aggregate market value equal to at least five times the base annual retainer. Non-management trustees are expected to meet the ownership guidelines within five years from the date of appointment or election to our Board. Each non-management trustee who has been on the Board for five years is in compliance with our share ownership guidelines. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will annually review each trustee’s compliance with our progress toward meeting the share ownership guidelines based on share ownership calculated as of the average closing share price over the prior year.

26 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 AUDIT MATTERS  

Audit Matters

Report of the Audit Committee

The Board of Trustees has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and experience requirements of The New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, and that Mr. Hadley, Mr. Carnahan and Ms. Lynch are “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and the NYSE.

The Audit Committee met 12 times in 2023. The Audit Committee’s agenda is established by the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP, or Deloitte, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and reviewed with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Deloitte the overall audit scope and plans, the results of the external audit examination, evaluations by the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company’s internal controls and the quality of its financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with Deloitte other matters required to be discussed by a registered public accounting firm with the Audit Committee under applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. The Audit Committee received and discussed with Deloitte its annual written report on its independence from the Company and its management, which is made pursuant to applicable requirements of the PCAOB, and considered with Deloitte whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with its independence.

In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and, necessarily in its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, which in its reports expresses an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s annual financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of year-end.

In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the reports of Deloitte, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees, and the Board of Trustees approved, the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2024.

The foregoing report has been furnished by the following current and former members of the Audit Committee:

Randall D. Hadley, Chair

Scott W. Carnahan

Catherine Lynch

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement27


 AUDIT MATTERS  

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In addition to performing the audits of our financial statements in Fiscal 2023 and Fiscal 2022, Deloitte provided other audit-related and non-audit-related services for us during these years.

Fees to Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2023 and 2022

The following table shows the fees billed by Deloitte for the audit and other services it provided to us in respect of Fiscal 2023 and Fiscal 2022.

   2023   2022 

Audit Fees(1)

  $2,593,026   $2,472,708 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   235,800    174,424 

Tax Fees(3)

   241,358    234,558 

All Other Fees(4)

   297,500    235,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $3,367,684   $3,116,690 

(1)

Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered during the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting, for the reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and the audit of the annual financial statements of certain of our subsidiaries.

(2)

Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for professional services for registration statements, the issuance of comfort letters and consents in connection with SEC filings and other compliance related testing.

(3)

Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice.

(4)

All Other Fees consist of certain agreed upon procedures related to certain of our financing transactions.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee approved all services performed by Deloitte during Fiscal 2023 in accordance with applicable SEC requirements. The Audit Committee has also pre-approved the use of Deloitte for certain audit-related and non-audit-related services, setting a specific limit on the amount of such services that we may obtain from Deloitte before additional approval is necessary. In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated to the chair of the Audit Committee the authority to approve both audit-related and non-audit-related services provided by Deloitte, provided that the chair will present any decision to the full Audit Committee for ratification at its next scheduled meeting.

28 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 PROPOSAL II—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  

Proposal II—Ratification of Appointment of

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our financial statements. The Audit Committee conducts a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence, and takes into account the insight provided to the Audit Committee and the quality of information provided on accounting issues, auditing issues and regulatory developments. The Audit Committee also considers whether, in order to ensure continuing auditor independence, there should be periodic rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm, taking into consideration the advisability and potential costs and impact of selecting a different firm.

The Audit Committee appointed Deloitte to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2024 fiscal year. Deloitte has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2009.

The Audit Committee exercises sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms associated with the retention of Deloitte. In addition to ensuring the regular rotation of the lead audit partner as required by law, the Audit Committee is involved in the selection of, and reviews and evaluates, the lead audit partner.

The Audit Committee evaluated Deloitte’s institutional knowledge and experience, quality of service, sufficiency of resources and quality of the team’s communications and interactions as well as the team’s objectivity and professionalism. As a result, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of Deloitte to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, we are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of Deloitte.

The Board is submitting the appointment of Deloitte to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views on this appointment and as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, it will be considered a recommendation to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

OUR BOARD OF MANAGEMENTTRUSTEES AND OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMEND A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement29


 SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION  

Security Ownership Information

Security Ownership of Officers and Trustees

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of the record dateMarch 31, 2024 relating to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by (i)(1) each of our named executive officers, Trustees(2) each of our trustees, and Trustee nominees, and (ii)(3) all of our current trustees and executive officers and Trustees as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the indicated person has sole voting and investment power.

 

  Total Shares Beneficially Owned (1) 
Trustees and Named Executive Officers  

Number

   

Percentage

 
Stanford L. Kurland  613,476(2)(3)  * 
David A. Spector  179,743   * 
Scott W. Carnahan  35,607   * 
Preston DuFauchard  7,626   * 
Randall D. Hadley  15,417(4)  * 
Clay A. Halvorsen  13,417   * 
Nancy McAllister  11,033   * 
Stacey D. Stewart  9,669   * 
Frank P. Willey  53,417   * 
Anne D. McCallion  83,572   * 
Steve Bailey  7,000   * 
Andrew S. Chang  45,712   * 
Vandad Fartaj  50,189   * 
Jeffrey P. Grogin  30,725   * 
Doug Jones  26,753   * 
Daniel S. Perotti  19,019   * 
David M. Walker  44,264   * 
All Trustees, Trustee nominees and executive officers as a group (17 persons)  1,246,639   1.80% 
   

 

Common Shares
Beneficially Owned
(1)

   
 Executive Officers and Trustees

 

  

Number

 

  

Percentage

 

    

David A. Spector

  239,198  

*

 

Scott W. Carnahan(2)

  73,425  

*

 

Donna M. Corley

  -  

*

 

Preston DuFauchard

  44,282  

*

 

Randall D. Hadley(3)

  68,911  

*

 

Doug Jones

  51,021  

*

 

Catherine A. Lynch

  

25,540

  

*

 

Nancy McAllister(4)

  

72,527

  

*

 

Renee R. Schultz(5)

  

18,679

  

*

 

Stacey D. Stewart

  

44,128

  

*

 

William Chang

  

20,502

  

*

 

Vandad Fartaj(6)

  

116,695

  

*

 

Daniel S. Perotti

  

80,715

  

*

 

Derek W. Stark

  

29,535

  

*

 

Current Executive Officers and Trustees as a group (14 persons)

  776,176  

0.89%

    

—————— 

*

Represents less than 1.0% of the common shares outstanding as of the record date.March 31, 2024.

(1)

Based on 69,249,01586,845,447 common shares outstanding as of the record date on a fully diluted basis.March 31, 2024. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any common shares if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of the record date.days. As used herein, “voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. None of the shares hashave been pledged as security.

(2)

Includes 157,29071,707 common shares either owned by a living trust or various retirement accounts. Mr. Carnahan also has 141 shares of the Kurland Revocable Trust.Company’s Series A preferred stock owned by a living trust.

(3)

Includes 6,000 common shares owned by the Kurland Family Foundation, as to which Mr. Kurland disclaims any beneficial interest.

(4)Includes 8,00058,000 common shares owned by the Randall and Maureen Hadley Family 2001 Trust.

(4)

Includes 12,366 common shares owned by Nancy McAllister and Richard M. Card as JTWROS.

(5)

Includes 1,306 RSUs that will vest on or before May 30, 2024.

(6)

Mr. Fartaj ceased serving as the Company’s Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer on March 3, 2023.

30 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION  

 

Security Ownership of Other Beneficial Owners

 

14

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

 

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common shares, based on our review of publicly available statements of beneficial ownership filed with the SEC on Schedules 13D and 13G as of the record date.SEC.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number of
Shares Owned
 Percentage of
Class (1)
BlackRock, Inc.(2)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10022
 4,935,934 7.13%

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (3)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19335

 4,869,044 7.03%
   Common Shares
Beneficially Owned
(1)

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

  

 

Number

 

   

 

Percentage 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, New York 10055

 

   

 

15,249,166

 

 

  

17.6% 

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(3)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

 

   

 

9,884,272

 

 

 

  

11.4% 

 

T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.(4)

101 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, Maryland 21201

 

   6,046,009   7.0% 

 

 ——————

(1)The “Percentage of Class” reported in this column has been calculated based upon 69,249,015

Based on 86,845,447 common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2024. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the record date, and may differ fromExchange Act. A person is deemed to be the “Percentagebeneficial owner of Class” reported in statements ofany common shares if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership filed withat any time within 60 days. As used herein, “voting power” is the SEC.power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.

(2)

As reported in an Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016 by BlackRock, Inc. In the Schedule 13G Amendment,January 22, 2024, BlackRock, Inc. disclosed that it had the sole voting power over 4,813,82415,164,191 common shares and sole dispositive power over 4,935,93415,249,166 common shares as of December 31, 2015.2023.

(3)

As reported in an Amendment No. 211 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016 by13, 2024, The Vanguard Group Inc., or Vanguard. In the Schedule 13G Amendment, Vanguard disclosed that it had the sole voting power over 93,932 common shares, shared voting power over 5,80056,229 common shares, sole dispositive power over 4,773,0129,736,191 common shares and shared dispositive power over 96,032148,081 common shares as of December 29, 2023.

(4)

As reported in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024, T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. disclosed that it had sole voting power over 2,231,726 common shares and sole dispositive power over 6,046,009 common shares as of December 31, 2015.2023.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement31


 OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  

 

15

COMPENSATION OF TRUSTEES

Non-Management Trustee Compensation

Our Executive Officers

The following table summarizes the annual retainer fees paidsets forth certain information with respect to our non-management Trustees during Fiscal 2015:

Base Annual Retainer, all non-management Trustees $65,000 
Base Annual Retainer, Independent Lead Trustee $20,000 
Base Annual Retainer, all non-management committee members:    
Audit and Compliance Committee $7,750 
Compensation Committee $7,750 
Nominating and Governance Committee $5,750 
Related Party Matters Committee $5,750 
Finance Committee $7,750 
Additional Annual Retainer, all committee chairs:    
Audit and Compliance Committee $10,750 
Compensation Committee $10,750 
Nominating and Governance Committee $7,750 
Related Party Matters Committee $7,750 
Finance Committee $10,750 

In addition to the standing committees described above, we also paid a retainer at the annual rate of $10,750 to the chair of the Demand Evaluation Committee and a retainer at the annual rate of $7,750 to all members of the Demand Evaluation Committee. The purpose of the Demand Evaluation Committee was to review and evaluate requests for information, inspection and other demands, and any allegations or claims that may have arisen in connection with shareholder letters received from time to time, and to also make findings and recommendations to the Board regarding its proposed responses to such letters. Effective March 23, 2015, the Demand Evaluation Committee was disbanded.

Our Trustees also are eligible to receive certain types of equity-based awards under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. During Fiscal 2015, each of Messrs. Carnahan, DuFauchard, Hadley, Halvorsen and Willey and Mmes. McAllister and Stewart received a grant of 7,125 restricted share units, or RSUs, which vest in three (3) equal annual installments beginning on the one (1) year anniversary of the date of the grant, February 23, 2015, and entitle the recipient thereof to receive dividend equivalents during the vesting period.

Our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan also provides that any independent Trustee newly elected or appointed to our Board will receive a one-time grant of 2,250 RSUs on the date of election or appointment, which shares will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant. Such RSUs do not entitle the recipient thereof to receive dividend equivalents during the vesting period. Further, all members of our Board will be reimbursed for their reasonable out of pocket costs and expenses in attending all meetings of our Board and its committees and certain other Company-related functions.

Policy Regarding Receipt of Shares in Lieu of Cash Trustee Fees. During 2014, the Board adopted a policy whereby non-management Trustee fees may be paid in cash or common shares at the election of each non-management Trustee. The number of common shares delivered in lieu of any cash payment of Trustee fees shall be equivalent in value to the amount of forgone Trustee fees divided by the fair market value (as defined in our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan) of a common share on the day on which the Trustee fees otherwise would have been paid in cash to the Trustee, rounded down to the nearest whole share.

Change In Control. Prior to vesting, an RSU is generally subject to forfeiture upon termination of service to us. Upon a change in control (as defined in our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan) or upon termination of our management agreement other than for cause (as defined in our management agreement), any RSU held by non-management trustees not previously vested shall become fully vested and will be settled in our common shares. The term of our management agreement expires on February 1, 2017, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

16

Non-Management Trustee Share Ownership Guidelines. Non-management Trustees are subject to share ownership guidelines whereby each such Trustee is expected to hold common shares with a market value equal to $175,000. Non-management trustees are expected to meet the ownership guidelines within five years from the date of appointment or election to Board. Each non-management Trustee who has been a member of our Board for five years or more is in compliance with the Company’s share ownership guidelines.The Compensation Committee will annually review each Trustee’s progress towards meeting the share ownership guidelines.

2015 Trustee Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the compensation earned by each non-management Trustee who served on our Board for Fiscal 2015.

Name(1) 

Fees Earned

or Paid

in Cash
($)(2)

  Stock
Awards
($)(3)
  Total
($)
 
Scott W. Carnahan  94,000   87,000   181,000 
Preston DuFauchard  84,714   87,000   171,714 
Randall D. Hadley  109,250   87,000   196,250 
Clay A. Halvorsen  76,500   87,000   163,500 
Nancy McAllister  93,015   87,000   180,015 
Stacey D. Stewart  88,015   87,000   175,015 
Frank P. Willey  95,000   87,000   182,000 

——————current executive officers:

 

Name

(1)Mr. Kurland, our Chairman of

Age

Position Held with the BoardCompany

David A. Spector

61

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

William Chang

46

Senior Managing Director and Mr. Spector, a TrusteeChief Investment Officer

James Follette

52

Senior Managing Director and our Executive Managing Director,Chief Digital Officer

Doug Jones

67

Trustee, President and Chief OperatingMortgage Banking Officer are not included in this table as they are officers of our Company

Daniel S. Perotti

43

Senior Managing Director and thus receive no additional compensation for their services as Trustees. Messrs. KurlandChief Financial Officer

Derek W. Stark

56

Senior Managing Director, Chief Legal Officer and Spector received compensation as officers of our Company for Fiscal 2015 as shown in the “2015 Summary Compensation Table.”Secretary

Biographical information for Mr. Spector and Mr. Jones is provided above under the caption “Proposal I—Election of Trustees.” Certain biographical information for the other executive officers is set forth below.

William Chang. Mr. Chang has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer since March 2023. Prior thereto, he served as our Senior Managing Director and Deputy Chief Investment Officer from January 2021 to March 2023 and as Managing Director, Capital Markets from June 2018 to January 2021. Mr. Chang also has served in a variety of other executive positions at PFSI and its affiliates since September 2012. Mr. Chang is responsible for all capital markets and investment-related activities, including the development and execution of investment strategies, secondary marketing, hedging activities and capital markets strategies with government-sponsored enterprises. In addition, Mr. Chang is responsible for developing and managing relationships with Wall Street broker-dealers and fixed income investors. Prior to joining PFSI and its affiliates, Mr. Chang served in the Mergers & Acquisitions Group at Credit Suisse. Mr. Chang earned a B.A. in Political Economy from Williams College. Mr. Chang is an experienced mortgage banking executive with substantial experience in capital markets, mortgage-related investments and risk management.

James Follette. Mr. Follette has been Senior Managing Director and Chief Digital Officer since November 2023. Mr. Follette previously served as Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Operations Officer from October 2022 to November 2023, Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Fulfillment Officer from February 2018 to October 2022 and Managing Director, Mortgage Fulfillment from February 2016 to February 2018, among other executive positions at PFSI and its affiliates since 2011. Mr. Follette is responsible for the Company’s technology and servicing operations. Prior to joining PFSI and its affiliates, Mr. Follette worked in several executive positions, including managing director, risk management, at Countrywide Financial Corporation (and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor) from 2003 until 2011, where he led operations and risk management and was responsible for all aspects of operational management, transactional risk management and business development. Mr. Follette earned a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Notre Dame and an M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Chicago. Mr. Follette is an experienced mortgage banking executive with significant experience in risk mitigation and technology strategies across various mortgage lending channels.

Daniel S. Perotti. Mr. Perotti has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer since January 1, 2021. Prior thereto, he served as the Company’s Deputy Chief Financial Officer from January 2017 to December 2020, and served as the Company’s Chief Asset and Liability Management Officer, among other positions at the Company since 2009. Mr. Perotti has also served in a variety of similar executive positions at PFSI and its affiliates since 2009. Mr. Perotti is responsible for overseeing the Company’s accounting and financial reporting, treasury operations, investor relations, financial planning and analysis, tax analysis, and Sarbanes-Oxley program. Prior to joining PFSI and its affiliates, Mr. Perotti was employed at BlackRock and served as the head of the quantitative research team within its BlackRock Solutions business as well as in various other roles at BlackRock, Inc. from 2002 to 2008. Mr. Perotti earned a B.A. in economics and computer science from Columbia University. Mr. Perotti is an experienced financial services executive with substantial experience in corporate finance and mortgage banking.

Derek W. Stark. Mr. Stark has been our Senior Managing Director, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since February 2018. Mr. Stark previously served as the Managing Director, General Counsel and Secretary among other executive positions at the Company since September 2009. Mr. Stark has also served in a variety of similar executive positions at PFSI and its affiliates since 2009. Mr. Stark is responsible for overseeing all of the Company’s legal management, including securities, corporate governance, corporate transactions, litigation and regulatory compliance, and he serves as the primary legal contact for the Company’s Board. Prior to joining PFSI and its affiliates, and after leaving private practice, Mr. Stark served in a variety of executive positions, including Executive Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, from 1999 to 2008, at Countrywide. Mr. Stark earned a B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley, and a J.D. from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. Mr. Stark is an experienced legal executive with significant experience in corporate and securities law, litigation and mortgage banking.

32  (2)Reflects fees earned by the Trustee in Fiscal 2015, whether or not paid in such year. LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


(3)Reflects the full grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, of RSUs granted to each of the independent Trustees on February 24, 2015. For more information on the assumptions used in our estimates of value, please refer toNote 29 – Share-Based Compensation Plans in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 29, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, each of our Trustees held 8,056 RSUs.

 REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE  

 

17

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Report of the Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended that our Board of Trustees include the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement and our 20152023 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Compensation Committee

Renee R. Schultz, Chair

The Compensation Committee
Frank P. Willey, Chairman
Nancy McAllister

Nancy McAllister

Stacey D. Stewart

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement33


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Table of Contents

 

 

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

35

Executive Summary of 2023 Compensation

36

2023 Say-On-Pay Vote and Engagement with Shareholders

36

Executive Compensation Paid by PFSI

37

2023 Compensation Program Overview

40

Compensation Decisions Made in Fiscal 2023

40

Executive Compensation Decision Making Process

44

Peer Group and Benchmarking

46

Executive Share Ownership Guidelines

47

Clawback Provisions

47

Trading Controls and Anti-Pledging and Anti-Hedging Policies

48

This compensation discussion and analysis provides a detailed description of our executive compensation programsprogram and policies, the material compensation decisions made under such programsprogram and policies with respect to our named executive officers, and the material factors that were considered in making those decisions. This narrative discussion should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below.

2023 Named Executive Officers

Our named“named executive officers” consisting of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our next three most highly compensated executive officers forand one former executive officer during Fiscal 20152023, were:

 

·Stanford L. Kurland,

David A. Spector, Trustee, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer;

·David A. Spector,

Doug Jones, Trustee, Executive Managing Director, President and Chief OperatingMortgage Banking Officer;

·Anne D. McCallion, Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer;
·Steve Bailey, Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Operations Officer;
·Andrew S. Chang, Senior Managing Director and Chief Business Development Officer;
·Vandad Fartaj,

William Chang; Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer;

·Jeffrey P. Grogin, Senior Managing Director , Chief Administrative and Legal Officer and Secretary;
·Doug Jones, Senior Managing Director and Chief Institutional Mortgage Banking Officer;
·

Daniel S. Perotti, Senior Managing Director and Chief AssetFinancial Officer;

Derek W. Stark, Senior Managing Director, Chief Legal Officer and Liability Management Officer;Secretary; and

·David M. Walker,

Vandad Fartaj, Former Senior Managing Director and Chief Risk Officer.Investment Officer (ceased serving position in March 2023).

34 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

 

This compensation discussion and analysis is presented as follows:Executive Compensation Highlights

 

What We Do

·Executive Summary

What We Don’t Do

·Executive Compensation Philosophy

Bias toward performance-based equity: Our Board seeks to ensure that our long-term incentive awards are weighted toward performance-based equity vehicles. We design our compensation program in a manner that is biased toward performance-based compensation with multiple performance metrics.

·Executive Compensation Decision Making Process

û No minimum levels of annual equity awards: Our executive officers are not guaranteed any minimum levels of annual equity award grants.

·Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Clawback Policy: Our Board maintains clawback policies regarding the recoupment of incentive compensation that apply to all of our Section 16 officers and any other officer whose title is Senior Managing Director.

·Compensation Decisions Made in Fiscal 2015

û No compensation from us other than equity awards for our named executive officers: Our named executive officers do not receive annual base salaries or cash bonuses from us.

·Share Ownership Guidelines

  Double-trigger vesting: We require that our equity awards have a “double trigger” to initiate accelerated vesting upon a change in control.

û No severance provisions: We do not provide cash severance to our executives.

  Minimum vesting periods: Our equity incentive plan provides that our equity awards are subject to a minimum vesting period of no less than one year on 95% of equity awards granted and our grants generally vest over three years, with approximately equal annual installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

û No excessive risk taking: We do not encourage our officers and employees (if any) to engage in excessive risk taking. Our compensation program is designed to encourage long-term decision making in alignment with the interests of our shareholders.

  Robust share ownership guidelines: We impose robust share ownership guidelines on our trustees and executive officers to ensure that their interests are aligned with those of our shareholders.

û No perquisites or excise tax gross-ups: We do not provide perquisites or related excise tax gross-ups to our executive officers.

  Consideration of Say-On-Pay Vote and proxy advisory and shareholder feedback: We engage in careful consideration of the annual Say-On-Pay results and feedback from shareholders and proxy advisory firms.

ûNo stock option re-pricing: Our equity incentive plan prohibits the re-pricing of stock options.

  Shareholder engagement: We engage in active discussions with our shareholders on a variety of topics throughout the year to ensure that we are addressing their concerns.

û No speculative or short-term trading: We prohibit our officers, employees (if any) and trustees from engaging in speculative and short-term trading of our securities.

  Comprehensive review of peer group: On an annual basis, we engage in a comprehensive review to assess and identify a relevant peer group of companies in our or a related industry.

û No hedging, pledging, short sales, or margin trading: We restrict our officers, employees (if any) and trustees from engaging in hedging, pledging, short sales, trading in publicly traded put or call options or trading on margin involving our securities.

  Independent compensation consultant: We utilize the services of Pearl Meyer, which is engaged directly by the Compensation Committee as an outside independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters.

û No supplemental executive retirement plans: We do not maintain any supplemental executive retirement plans for named executive officers.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement35


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

 

Executive Summary of 2023 Compensation

 

Although our named executive officers are generally compensated by their employer, PFSI and its affiliates, our Manager, we alsoCompensation Committee has granted, and may continue to grant, from time to time, equity-based awards designed to align the interests of employees of PFSI and its affiliates who provide themservices to us with compensationthose of our shareholders, by allowing such employees, including our named executive officers, an opportunity to share in the creation of value for our shareholders through capital appreciation and dividends. Currently, these equity-based awards are in the form of performance-based restricted share units, or PSUs, and restricted share units, or RSUs, which we grantand are granted by our Compensation Committee in ourits discretion under our 2009 Equity Incentive2019 Plan. In order to ensure that our executive compensation program aligns with the interests of our shareholders and focuses on long-term performance, we grant PSUs that vest upon our Company’s satisfaction of performance measures tied to return on equity, or ROE, and a relative total shareholder return, or TSR. PSU and RSU awards granted to our named executive officers are designed to align their interests with those of our shareholders by providing each named executive officer providing services to us through PFSI and its affiliates with an ownership or ownership-based interest in our Company and a stake in our long-term success. Our PSU and RSU awards are also designed to further motivate our named executive officers to achieve highexceptional Company and individual performance and reward them for such performance through a long-term incentive structure that does not encourage excessive risk-taking.risk taking. We also believe that directly compensatingproviding equity compensation to our named executive officers is appropriate given the risks and liability they undertake as named executive officers of a public company. Historically, the compensation for our named executive officersconsisted solely of RSUs, which we believe have been appropriate for these purposes. In order to ensure that our executive compensation program remains generally consistent with market practices and focused on long-term performance, however, for Fiscal 2016, we modified the composition of the long-term equity awards to include performance-based restricted share units, or PSUs, that vest only upon the Company’s satisfaction of performance measures tied to return on equity. We believe that our executive compensation program objectives have resulted in decisions regarding executive compensation that have appropriately encouraged growth in our businesses and the achievement of financial goals without excessive risk-taking,risk taking, thus benefiting our shareholders and generating long-term shareholder value.

Executive Compensation Philosophy2023 Say-On-Pay Vote and Engagement with Shareholders

 

The overall objectiveAt our 2023, 2022 and 2021 annual meetings of shareholders, approximately 98% of votes cast by our shareholders supported our Say-On-Pay advisory vote on executive compensation. We believe the positive Say-On-Pay voting results reflect our commitment to maintain a pay for performance culture that aligns with our stakeholder interests. Following our 2023 shareholder meeting, the Compensation Committee and our Board closely reviewed the shareholder vote on our Say-On-Pay proposal and the differences in voting results between our 2023 annual meeting results and prior years, including the recommendations made by certain proxy advisory firms. As a result of our executiveongoing shareholder engagement and recommendations of certain proxy advisory firms, we have established a number of compensation program is to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders by providing them with an ownership or ownership-based interest in our Companydisclosure and a stake in our long-term success. We believe that in order to achieve this objective, our compensation program must be competitive with executive compensation arrangements generally provided to similarly situated executive officers in our business markets, as well as at other companies in our industry where we compete for talent. Our executive compensation program is designed to:governance best practices, including:

 

·Create

PSU performance awards contain two performance metrics, ROE and relative total shareholder return (“Relative TSR”). We believe including a culture that rewards executives for high Company and individual performance;

·Align the interestsRelative TSR performance metric aligns management incentives with shareholder goals of relative outperformance against our executives with those of our shareholders; 
·Facilitate our Manager’s and Servicer’s ability to attract, motivate and retain highly talented executive leaders who will be crucial to our long-term success and ultimate sustainability; and 
·Encourage our executives to focus on the achievement of our annual and long-term business goals.peer group;

 

 19 

Our Compensation Committee aims to position the compensation of our named executive officers at a level commensurate with the compensation paid to other executives holding comparable positions at companies similar

We provide enhanced disclosures set forth in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication with which we and our Manager compete for executive talent. Our Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation program to meet these objectives.

Executive Compensation Decision Making Process

Role of the Compensation Committee.The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for recommending to our Board the compensation of our CEO and determining the compensation of our other named executive officers. Members of the Compensation Committee are appointed by the Board of Directors. Currently, the Compensation Committee consists of three members of the Board, Mr. Willey and Mmes. McAllister and Stewart, none of whom serve as our executive officers. Each of Mr. Willey and Mmes. McAllister and Stewart qualifies as an “independent director” under the rules of the NYSE. See the section entitled “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE, BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES — Board of Trustees Committees — Compensation Committee.” Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts an evaluation of each named executive officer to determine if changes in such officer’s compensation are appropriate based on the considerations described below. At the Compensation Committee’s request, Mr. Kurland provides input for the Compensation Committee regarding the performance and appropriate compensation of the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee gives considerable weight to Mr. Kurland’s evaluation of the other named executive officers because of his direct knowledge of each such officer’s performance and contributions.

The Role of the Outside Independent Compensation Consultant.Our Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, compensate and terminate any independent compensation consultant of its choosing in assessing our compensation program and determining the appropriate, competitive levels of compensation for our executive officers. During Fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee utilized Mercer (US) Inc., or Mercer, as its outside independent compensation consultant for this purpose. The Compensation Committee requested Mercer’s advice and counsel on various matters relating to executive and director compensation, including the following:

·Conducting a review of the competitive market data for our named executive officers.
·Assessing our executive compensation peer group and recommending changes as necessary.
·Assessing compensation levels within our peer group for named executive officers and other executive officers.
·Reviewing historical financial performance for peer group companies in assessing our Company’s overall performance.
·Providing market research on various issues as requested by our Company.
·Preparing materials for and participating in Compensation Committee meetings, as requested.
·Reviewing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of thisour Proxy Statement and other compensation-related disclosures, as requested.
·Consulting with our Company regarding compensation strategy and best practices.
·Assisting in compensation plan designs and modifications, as requested.

Mercer did not provide any other services to us in Fiscal 2015. During 2015, the Compensation Committee also retained Mercer as its outside independent compensation consultant to provide advice and counsel regarding executive and director compensation to be paid in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

Assessment of Outside Independent Compensation Consultant Conflicts of Interest. The Compensation Committee has reviewed whether the work provided by Mercer raises any conflicts of interest. Factors considered by the Compensation Committee include the following six factors specified by the NYSE rules: (1) other services provided to us by Mercer; (2) what percentage of Mercer’s total revenue is made up of fees from us; (3) policies or procedures of Mercer that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between individual consultants involved in the engagement and Compensation Committee members; (5) any shares of our common stock owned by individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and Mercer or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. Based on its review of these factors and representations of Mercer, the Compensation Committee does not believe that Mercer has a conflict of interest with respect to the work performed for us or the Compensation Committee.

20

The Use of Peer Group and Competitive Market Data.Our management and the Compensation Committee review competitive market data to assist in decision-making regarding our compensation and benefits programs. The market data reviewed includes both peer proxy data and survey data of companies similar in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication, as provided by Mercer. Proxy data was gathered from proxy statements and other publicly filed documents. Survey data was gathered from the 2015 US Mercer Benchmark Database, which contains compensation data from over 3,000 participating organizations in the United States, Towers Watson Data Services Management Survey Reports, and McLagan’s Mortgage Banking survey reports. As a result of this review, the Compensation Committee removed CreXus Investment Corp. from our peer group, creating the following peer group of 13 companies:

·AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.

·American Capital Mortgage Investment Corp.

·Apollo Residential Mortgage, Inc.

·Armour Residential REIT, Inc.

·Chimera Investment Corporation

·Hatteras Financial Corp.

·Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd.

·Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

·iStar Financial Inc.

·Newcastle Investment Corp.

·Redwood Trust, Inc.

·Starwood Property Trust, Inc.

·Two Harbors Investment Corp.

The Compensation Committee believes that this revised peer group better reflects our competitors in the industry that currently conduct similar businesses and have comparable scales of operations. Together with its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee intends to review this peer group periodically to ensure that it remains the appropriate comparable group.

Governance and Other Considerations. The Compensation Committee, along with our Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Human Resources, continually assess our compensation programs and policies to evaluate whether they remain aligned with our efforts to create a culture to align the interests of our named executive officers with our shareholders, balance risk and reward, and execute strong governance practices. The following actions and best practices are intended to provide for continued adherence to these principles:

What We DoWhat We Don’t Do
ü  Utilize the services of Mercer, which is engaged directly by the Committee as an outside independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters. û  Permit our executives to engage in speculative and short-term trading of our securities.
ü  Consult with our outside independent compensation consultant to reaffirm our determination that our compensation programs are not designed to encourage excessive risk-taking.û  Permit hedging, short sales or trading on margin involving our securities.
ü  Engage in careful consideration of the annual say-on-pay results and shareholder feedback.û  Permit repricing of stock options without shareholder approval to the extent any are granted pursuant to our equity compensation plan.
ü  Engage in active shareholder discussions regarding compensation and governance related issues.û  Provide our executives with annual base salaries or cash bonuses.
ü  Impose share ownership guidelines on our trustees and, for Fiscal 2016, on our executive officers to ensure that their interests are aligned with those of our shareholders.û  Provide for guaranteed minimum levels of annual equity award grants.

The Role of the Say-on-Pay Vote.Last year’s non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation, otherwise known as “say on pay,” was very positive with approximately 94% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal in favor of our pay practices, as described in the 2015 proxy statement. After considering the strong support the proposal received, as well as the Compensation Committee’s view of the value of consistency from year to year in our approach to compensation, the Compensation Committee concluded that only modest changes to the compensation program for our named executive officers were necessary.With respect to such changes, for Fiscal 2016, we modified the composition of the long-term equity awards from solely RSUs to a combination of both RSUs that are time-based and PSUs that vest only upon the Company’s satisfaction of performance measures tied to return on equity.

Compensation Policies and Practices As They Relate to Our Risk Management. We have designed our executive compensation program to reward strong Company and individual performance. Company performance objectives are based on our overall performance rather than on only a few discrete performance measures related to a particular aspect of our Company’s business. We believe that this structure, as further explained below, minimizes risks resulting from compensation practices.

21

Our Compensation Committee believes that its compensation policies and practices for our named executive officers do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. We believe that appropriate safeguards are in place with respect to our compensation program and policies that assist in mitigating excessive risk-taking that could harm the value of our Company or reward poor judgment by our executives.

In that regard, the Compensation Committee requested assistance from Mercer in reviewing our compensation policies and practices. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation policies and practices as they apply to our named executive officers are designed with an appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

As part of the review, numerous factors were noted that reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking which include, but are not limited to, the following:

·Our compensationpaid to our named executive officers consists solelyby PFSI, an affiliate of long-term equity awards in the form of RSUsour Manager and for 2016, PSUs.
·Our Compensation Committee has ultimate authority to determine, and adjust, if appropriate, compensation provided to our executive officers, including each of the named executive officers. 
·Ournamed executive officers are subject to share ownership guidelines that require a certain minimum level of share ownership.
·Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain any advisor it deems necessary to fulfill its obligations. Servicer;

We maintain clawback policies regarding the recoupment of incentive compensation that apply to all of our Section 16 officers and any other officer whose title is Senior Managing Director;

Our second amended and restated bylaws provide for a majority voting standard in uncontested trustee elections with a plurality carve-out for contested trustee elections;

Our corporate governance guidelines provide for the resignation of any trustee who fails to receive a majority vote in an uncontested election; and

Our shareholders who have held at least 1% of our outstanding common shares for a period of at least one year have the right to submit a proposal to shareholders to amend our second amended and restated bylaws. In order to pass, any such proposal must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on a matter pursuant to such proposal.

36 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

The Role2023 Stakeholder Interactions

We have established and maintained a robust investor relations program that includes constant and proactive outreach with our shareholders, bondholders, the rating agencies, and other stakeholders. Members of Our Manager.our executive management team and members of our investor relations team meet frequently with current and prospective investors in person at our offices, conferences and non-deal roadshows, and virtually via fireside chats or virtual meetings. Not only do these meetings enable investors to better understand our activities and the mortgage industry in general, but they provide us with valuable feedback and insights, which are in turn, presented to and considered by our Board.

LOGO

Transparency is important:

In addition to required SEC filings, earnings webcasts and press releases, we strive to publish in a timely fashion materials that effectively illustrate the drivers of our financial performance. This includes earnings presentations and supplemental financial schedules, which can be found on our website at pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com.

Consistent messaging:

Regardless of whether the stakeholder is a prospective or current shareholder, bondholder, rating agency or an institution focused on corporate sustainability, we strive to tell a consistent story, adhering to our founding principles of being accountable, reliable and ethical.

(1)

Includes shareholders required to report their ownership of our common shares on Form 13F or others as of December 31, 2023 and excludes passively managed owners.

Executive Compensation Paid by PFSI

We are externally managedutilize an external management structure and we currently have seven employees of our own; therefore, the management of our business and execution of our operations is performed on our behalf by our Manager, our Servicer and other PFSI affiliates pursuant to a management agreement and other related party agreements. This external management structure allows us to operate with more limited infrastructure, which reduces overhead costs and provides thatpredictability regarding the operating expenses required to run our business. Through PFSI, we have access to greater infrastructure and resources than we might otherwise have if we were to internalize operations. Pursuant to the terms of our management agreement, our Manager is responsible for managing our affairsearns a base management fee equal to the sum of (a) 1.5% per year of shareholders’ equity up to $2 billion, (b) 1.375% per year of shareholders’ equity in consideration forexcess of $2 billion and up to $5 billion, and (c) 1.25% per year of shareholders’ equity in excess of $5 billion. Our Manager may also earn a management fee. The management agreement does not provide for a specific allocation of any portionperformance incentive fee, both quarterly and in arrears, equal to: (a) 10% of the amount by which net income attributable to common shares for the quarter exceeds (i) an 8% return on equity plus the high watermark (as defined under the heading “Management Agreement” in the “Certain Relationships and Related

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement37


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Transactions” section in this Proxy Statement), up to (ii) a 12% return on equity; plus (b) 15% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds (i) a 12% return on equity plus the high watermark, up to (ii) a 16% return on equity; plus (c) 20% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds a 16% return on equity plus the high watermark. Our Manager earned approximately $28.8 million in base management fee for executive officer compensation. Rather,fees and zero in performance incentive fees in Fiscal 2023 in connection with work performed under our management agreement.

Our executive officers are employed by our Manager or one or more of its affiliatesPFSI and, therefore, receive compensation from one of those entities.PFSI. While our ManagerPFSI may use a portion of our management fee to compensate its executive officers, we do not specifically allocate any portion of the management fee to such compensation nor are we awareand the management agreement does not require any such allocation related to PFSI’s compensation arrangements with our named executive officers.

The following information relating to these compensation arrangements have been provided to us by PFSI and its affiliates.

PFSI’s Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

PFSI, through its executive compensation program, seeks to:

Maintain a pay-for-performance culture where total compensation for our executives is performance based;

Align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders with a significant emphasis on equity incentives and performance based compensation;

Assess executive compensation against market compensation benchmarks prepared by our independent board consultant;

Facilitate the attraction, motivation and retention of highly talented executives who will be crucial to our long-term success and sustainability;

Encourage executives to focus on achieving our annual and long-term business goals; and

Appropriately compensate its executives who also provide support of our Company in PFSI’s role as our external Manager, loan servicer and other service provider.

PFSI aims to position the total compensation of its named executive officers at a level commensurate with the total compensation paid to other executives holding comparable positions at companies similar in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication with which PFSI competes for executive talent.

PFSI’s 2023 Executive Compensation Decisions

In setting compensation for its executives, including our named executive officers, PFSI takes into consideration a number of factors in determining the total compensation payable to its employees including the type, scope and level of responsibility of the basis on which (or revenues from which)executive, competitive market dynamics, and the individual contributions made by the executive to the success of PFSI. In making its determinations regarding compensation arrangements with our named executive officers, PFSI does not take into account the amount of the management fee we pay to our Manager. This is because a whole team of professionals at our Manager, choosesour Servicer and their affiliates (including our named executive officers) supports our Company and these professionals not only support our management efforts, but also work on activities for us that are unrelated to compensate its executive officers. Wethe management agreement (e.g., mortgage loan servicing and mortgage loan fulfillment), as well as a broad range of other activities unrelated to us entirely. Many of these activities are onefor PFSI’s own account or the accounts of multiple clients advisedother third party stakeholders.

To put this into context, the base management fees and performance incentive fees paid by us to our Manager represented approximately 2.1% of the $1.4 billion in total net revenues of our Manager and its affiliates during Fiscal 2023. No portion of such fees was directly allocated to the investment management business is onecompensation paid by PFSI to any of only three operating segments from which our Manager derives income that may be used to compensate itsnamed executive officers. Our

Furthermore, we do not believe that base management fees and performance incentive fees as a percentage of PFSI’s total net revenues is an accurate or appropriate reflection of the portion of total compensation paid by PFSI to our named executive officers do not receive anythat is attributable to the services they provide our Company under the management agreement. Based on that approach and using the same percentage, however, we estimate that approximately $373,353, or 2.1%, of the $17.8 million of total compensation paid by PFSI to our named executive officers during Fiscal 2023 would be deemed attributable to such services. Of the total compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer by PFSI in Fiscal 2023, we estimate that approximately 15% was fixed (e.g., annual base salary) and approximately 85% was variable or incentive pay (e.g., performance-incentive and equity awards). Of the total compensation paid to our other thannamed executive officers by PFSI in Fiscal 2023, we estimate that approximately 18% was fixed (e.g., annual base salary) and approximately 82% was variable or incentive pay (e.g., performance-incentive and equity awards).

38 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

2023 Annual Performance-Based Incentives Paid by PFSI

The annual performance-based incentives paid to our named executive officers by PFSI included a performance component equal to 70% of the annual target incentive based on achieving ROE and a strategic award component equal to 30% of the annual target incentive based on individual strategic objectives set at the beginning of the year. To determine annual performance-based incentive amounts, PFSI’s Compensation Committee first sets a target level of performance-based incentive for each named executive officer for the fiscal year based on competitive market data. Each named executive officer’s potential performance-based incentive payout varies based on such individual’s level of responsibility and position within our organization. PFSI believes that ROE is an appropriate measure for annual performance-based incentives because it provides our named executive officers with an incentive to achieve favorable current results, while also producing sustainable long-term shareholder value.

Each named executive officer’s target annual incentive was contingent on meeting the annual financial and strategic goals. Failure to meet the minimum ROE financial performance threshold would result in no ROE incentive payout, while exceeding the ROE financial performance target would result in incentive payouts over target, subject to a maximum payout cap of 300% for the financial performance component and 150% for the strategic award component. The total maximum annual incentive payable in Fiscal 2023 was 255% of target assuming all goals were achieved at maximum.

In Fiscal 2023, PFSI’s management delivered net income of $144.7 million and ROE of 4%, on net revenues of $1.4 billion, which was down from Fiscal 2022, primarily due to the smaller origination market resulting from higher interest rates, and a nonrecurring unadjusted pretax legal accrual of $158.4 million. PFSI’s ROE of 4% was below the minimum ROE financial performance threshold and resulted in no ROE incentive payout. The PFSI Compensation Committee also considered management’s execution of strategic objectives for the PFSI named executive officers and concluded that these objectives were achieved at the maximum payout of 150%. Based on the overall assessment of PFSI’s Fiscal 2023 performance and the Chairman’s recommendations, PFSI’s Compensation Committee approved the annual performance-based incentive amounts for the PFSI named executive officers at an overall payout percentage of 45%.

2023 Long-Term Equity Awards Granted by PFSI

In determining the equity awards described herein,granted to the PFSI named executive officers in Fiscal 2023, the PFSI Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, the recommendations of management and various reports provided by our independent compensation consultant. The PFSI Compensation Committee also considered (i) the value of the proposed equity awards; (ii) the historical equity awards previously granted to each named executive officer and the corresponding values at the time of the consideration of the 2023 grants; (iii) the value of share grants to the PFSI named executive officers providing comparable services at our industry and sector peers; (iv) the anticipated contribution by our named executive officer in future fiscal years, taking into account the role, responsibility and scope of each position and the PFSI Compensation Committee’s perception regarding the quality of the services provided by each named executive officer in carrying out those responsibilities; (v) PFSI’s financial and operating performance in the past year and its perceived future prospects; (vi) the mix of equity awards to total compensation; and (vii) general market practices. The PFSI Compensation Committee considered these multiple factors in determining whether to increase or decrease the target amounts from the Company.prior year’s equity award grants. There was no formulaic approach in the use of these various factors in determining the number of shares to award to each named executive officer. The share amounts were determined on a subjective basis, using the various factors, in the PFSI Compensation Committee’s sole discretion.

The PFSI Compensation Committee provided long-term equity incentives for Fiscal 2023 to the PFSI named executive officers through the following target value mix of performance-based restricted stock units, time-based restricted stock units and stock options:

PFSI Long-Term Equity Incentives

Target Mix Percentage 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

50%

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units

25%

Stock Options

25%

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement39


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

2023 Summary Compensation Paid by PFSI (1)

The following table presents compensation paid by PFSI as of Program.We dothe end of Fiscal 2023 utilizing the methodology required by the SEC to report compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Name

 

  

Year

 

   

Salary

($)

 

   

Non-equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)

 

   

Stock

Awards

($)

 

   

Option

Awards

($)

 

   

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

   

Total

($)

 

 

 

David A. Spector

 

   2023    1,000,000    1,631,250    3,374,957    1,184,278    67,998    7,258,483 

 

Doug Jones

 

   2023    600,000    1,125,000    1,874,922    657,935    61,750    4,319,607 

 

Daniel S. Perotti

 

   2023    400,000    630,000    937,400    328,968    48,536    2,344,904 

 

William Chang

 

   2023    387,500    450,000    749,851    259,660    19,895    1,866,906 
(1)

For complete information regarding the executive compensation paid by PFSI, shareholders should refer to the “2023 Summary Compensation Table” contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement of PFSI, which was filed with the SEC on April 19, 2024. Information in this table reflects all disclosed compensation paid by PFSI to its named executive officers who are also named executive officers of the Company, not just compensation attributable to their work on our behalf, and excludes Mr. Fartaj and Mr. Stark since neither was a named executive officer of PFSI in Fiscal 2023.

2023 Compensation Program Overview

During Fiscal 2023, we did not have employment agreements with our named executive officers, we doofficers. We also did not provide pension or retirement benefits, perquisites or other personal benefits to our named executive officers,officers. However, all unvested RSUs and we do not have arrangements to make payments toPSUs granted under our executive officers2019 Plan will vest immediately upon a termination of services other than for cause or upon the termination of our management agreement orbetween us and our Manager other than for cause (as defined in the event of a change in control of the Company. Rather, we useour management agreement). We utilized long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity-based awards, which we issue under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. The long-term incentive2019 Plan as described herein.

Cash Compensation

We do not pay any cash compensation awards are designed to align the interestsour named executive officers or to any other employees of PFSI who support our officers and service providers with those of our shareholders, all of whom will share together in the creation of value through capital appreciation and dividends. We believe that equity-based awards are consistent with our shareholders’ interest in book value growth as these individuals will be provided with less of an incentive to take short-term risk and more of an incentive to grow book value for shareholders over time.

Elements of our Executive Compensation Program

Cash and Other Compensation

business. Our named executive officers and other personnel who conduct our business are employees of our Manager or one or more of its affiliates. Accordingly, we do not pay or accrue any salaries orPFSI and, therefore, PFSI is responsible for all such cash bonuses to our named executive officers.compensation and for making decisions relating thereto based on such factors as it determines appropriate.

22

Equity-Based Compensation

The Compensation Committee may, from time to time pursuant to our 2009 Equity Incentive2019 Plan, grant our named executive officers certain equity-based awards, including options, restricted shares,PSUs, RSUs PSUs, unrestricted shares, LTIP units (a special class of partnership interests in PennyMac Operating Partnership, L.P., which we refer to as our Operating Partnership) and other awards based on our shares. These awards are designed to align the interests of our named executive officersManager and employees of PFSI who provide services to us with those of our shareholders, by allowing our named executive officerssuch individuals to share in the creation of value for our shareholders through capital appreciation and dividends. These awards provide a further benefit to us by enabling our Manager and ServicerPFSI to attract, motivate and retain talented individuals who are willing to undertake the risks and liability associated with serving as executive officers of a public company. These equity awards are generally subject to vesting requirements over a number of years and are designed to promote the retention of management and to achieve strong performance for our Company.

We believe our compensation policies are particularly appropriate since we are an externally managed REIT. REIT regulations require us to pay at least 90% of our taxable income to shareholders as dividends. As a result, we believe that our shareholders are principally interested in receivingthe generation of attractive risk-adjusted dividends and growthreturns that result in dividends and book value.value growth. Accordingly, we want to provide an incentive to our named executive officers that rewards success in achieving these goals. Since we generally do not have the ability to retain earnings, weWe believe that equity-based awards serve to align the interests of named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders in receivinggenerating attractive risk-adjusted dividends and growth. Additionally, we believereturns that equity-based awards are consistent with our shareholders’ interest indrive dividends, book value growth as these individuals will be incentivized to grow book value for shareholders over time. We believe that this alignmentand long-term performance.

2023 Compensation Decisions

On February 28, 2023, after consideration of interests provides an incentiveour performance in light of the qualitative and quantitative performance measures set forth below and after consultation with senior management, our Compensation Committee approved the PSU and RSU grants to our named executive officers and other employees of PFSI who provide services to implement strategies that will enhanceus under our long-term performancemanagement agreement and promote growth in dividends and growth in book value.other related party agreements.

 

40 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement

Compensation Decisions Made in Fiscal 2015


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

 

The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula to calculateconsiders many material factors, including (1) the numberresults of equity awards to be granted tothe annual Say-On-Pay vote regarding the executive compensation of our named executive officers underduring the prior fiscal year; (2) our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and does not explicitly set future award levels/opportunities on the basisChairman’s evaluation of what theour named executive officers earned from prior awards. Whileofficer’s performance in the Compensation Committee will take past awards into account, it will not solely base future awards in view of those past awards. In determiningpreceding fiscal year; (3) the equity awards granted in Fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, the recommendations ofanticipated contribution by our Manager and various reports that Mercer provided. We also considered (i) the value of the proposed equity awards; (ii) the historical equity awards previously granted to each named executive officer in the upcoming fiscal year, taking into account the role, responsibility and the corresponding values at the time of the consideration of the grants; (iii) the value of equity awards granted to named executive officers providing comparable services at our industry and sector peers; (iv) the title and responsibilitiesscope of each named executive officerposition and the Compensation Committee’s perception regarding the quality of the services provided by each named executive officer in carrying out those responsibilities; (v)(4) the extent to which the long-term equity award grant value is within (or outside) a certain range of percentile levels for long-term equity award grants for comparable positions at our industry and sector peers (and whether it is at the lower or upper end of such range); (5) any extraordinary changes that have occurred (such as a significant change in responsibilities or a promotion); (6) the compensation earned by or granted to our named executive officers from PFSI, as well as the combined value of compensation earned from or granted by PFSI and our Company relative to peer compensation; (7) the value and potential value for our named executive officer of the other elements of our Company’s compensation program; (8) recommendations of PFSI and various reports provided by our independent compensation consultants; (9) our financial and operating performance in the past year and our perceived future prospects; and (vi)(10) general market practices.

The Compensation Committee considered these multiple factors in determining whether to increase or decrease the amounts of the prior year’s equity award grants. There was no formulaic approach in the use of these various factors in determining the number of shares to award to each named executive officer. The equity award amounts granted to our named executive officers were determined on a subjective basis, using the various factors, in the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion. Certain named executive officers have greater influence and higher expected levels of contribution as it relates

The Compensation Committee provided long-term equity incentives for Fiscal 2023 to Company performance, and, therefore, received higher equity award amounts. Those named executive officers who have similar influences and expected levels of contribution to Company performance ultimately received equal equity award amounts.

2015 Restricted Share Unit Grants

During Fiscal 2015, we granted our named executive officers RSUs under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan inthrough the following amounts: Mr. Kurland, 78,641 RSUs; Mr. Spector, 53,911 RSUs; Mr. Fartaj, 24,185; Ms. McCallion, 17,985 RSUs;target value mix of performance-based RSUs and Messrs. Bailey,time-based RSUs:

PMT Long-Term Equity Incentives

Target Mix Percentage 

Performance-Based RSUs

55%

Time-Based RSUs

45%

In addition, on March 20, 2023, our Compensation Committee approved an additional grant for William Chang Grogin, Jones, Perottias the result of his promotion to Senior Managing Director and Walker, 14,613 RSUs each. Chief Investment Officer.

2023 Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Grants 

The RSUsFiscal 2023 PSUs provided that the vesting will be contingent upon the achievement of two performance goal components with equal weighting, ROE and Relative TSR, as summarized below:

Fiscal 2023 Performance Goals and Rationale

PSU

2023Rationale

Performance Metrics

  Return on Equity

  Relative TSR

  Aligns with shareholder feedback supporting the use of having multiple performance goals

  ROE measures a company’s profitability by representing how much profit a company generates in relation to the money equity holders have invested, including retained profits

  We believe the Relative TSR metric aligns management incentives with shareholder goals of relative outperformance against a peer group

Performance Period

Three one-year performance periods

  Three one-year performance periods provides a measure of performance and achievement aligning with current financial objectives

Peer Group

Peer Group

  Fiscal 2023 performance measured against the current peer group for the Relative TSR metric; future period performance for the Relative TSR metric measured against the peer group in place at the beginning of the annual performance period

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement41


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Performance Measures for 2023 Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Grants

A summary of the performance goals for our outstanding PSUs granted to our named executive officers generally vest ratably over a four-yearin Fiscal 2023 is provided below:

2023 PSU (Fiscal Years 2023-2025)

Component

Key TermsTarget% of
Total

Return on Equity

ROE is the amount of net income attributable to common shareholders expressed as a percentage of average monthly common shareholders’ equity. ROE = Net Income attributable to common shareholders for a fiscal year ÷ average monthly common shareholders’ equity. The performance measurement periods are 2023, 2024 and 2025. ROE payout opportunity exists annually and cumulatively. Less than a 6% ROE generates a zero payout, a 6% ROE generates a 50% payout and a 10% ROE or greater generates a 150% payout with a linear progression between those two endpoints. If ROE in year 1 or year 2 is less than 8% and cumulative ROE in years 1 and 2 is greater than 12%, or in years 1-3 is greater than 18%, cumulative ROE over the applicable 2 or 3 year period may be utilized to determine the award. The annual award is the greater of the amount determined under the annual approach or the cumulative approach. The cumulative approach may only be applied once during the three years. There is no lookback to a year that generated a payout greater than or equal to 100%.

8%

cumulative,

annualized

ROE

50%

Relative Total Shareholder Return

Relative TSR will be measured based on the 30-day average closing market price, adjusted for dividends, of the Company and each member of our peer group at the beginning and the end of each performance period. Peers that are bankrupt, liquidated or operating in bankruptcy will be treated as having - 100% TSR; acquired companies will be removed from the peer group.

Less than a 20th percentile Relative TSR generates a zero payout, a 20th to 40th percentile Relative TSR generates a 50% of target payout, a 40th to 60th percentile Relative TSR generates a 100% of target payout, a 60th to 80th percentile Relative TSR generates a 150% of target payout and an 80th percentile or greater Relative TSR generates a 200% payout.

12/31/2022-12/31/2023 performance will be compared to the current peer group noted below; and future performance periods will be compared against the peer group in place at the beginning of the annual performance period.

2023 peer group: Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Arbor Realty Trust, ARMOUR Residential REIT, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Chimera Investment, Invesco Mortgage Capital, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, Ladder Capital, MFA Financial, Rithm Capital Corp., New York Mortgage Trust, Redwood Trust, Starwood Property Trust, and Two Harbors Investment.

40%-60%

Relative
TSR

50%

2023 Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Design Changes

The Compensation Committee decided to change the performance weighting of the PSUs granted to our named executive officers in Fiscal 2023 in light of the higher inflationary and interest rate macroeconomic environment impacting the housing and mortgage market to place greater emphasis on the one-year anniversaryRelative TSR performance metric. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee decided to separate the ROE and Relative TSR performance measures so that each would be weighted at 50% rather than weighting ROE at 100% and treating the Relative TSR performance measure as a modifier to the ROE performance measure. The design change allows more opportunity for the Fiscal 2023 PSUs to vest, with the maximum amount of the grant date (or such other dateFiscal 2023 PSUs that may vest equal to 175% of target which is lower than the maximum amount of the Fiscal 2022 PSUs that may vest which was 187.5% of target. In addition, the Compensation Committee decided to keep the Fiscal 2023 target ROE goal at 8% which is the same target as determined byin Fiscal 2022 and greater than the Committee) and entitle the recipients thereof to receive dividend equivalents during the vesting period.actual results achieved in Fiscal 2022.

 

 

42 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

 

A summary of the performance measures and targets contained in the PSUs granted to our named executive officers during Fiscal 2023 is provided below and each of these awards is further described in the “2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table:

    Fiscal 2023 PSU Awards

   Performance Component Threshold Target Maximum 

% of

 Target 

 % of
 Maximum 
 

Performance-Based

Restricted

Share Units

  ROE (1) 6.0% - Cumulative Annualized ROE Payout = 50% 

8.0% - Cumulative Annualized ROE

Payout = 100%

 

10.0% - Cumulative Annualized ROE

Payout = 150%

 100% 150%
  

 

Relative TSR (2)

 

 

20-40%

Payout = 50%

 

 

40-60%

Payout = 100%

 

 

80-100%

Payout = 200%

 

 

100%

 

 

200

          100% 175%

(1)23

ROE = Net Income ÷ Average Month-End Equity ÷ Years in Measurement Period (1/1/2023 – 12/31/2025).

(2)

Relative TSR will be measured based on the 30-day average closing market price, adjusted for dividends, of the Company and each member of the peer group at the beginning and the end of each performance period. Peers that are bankrupt, liquidated or operating in bankruptcy will be treated as having - 100% TSR; acquired companies will be removed from the peer group.

Approximately 55% of the long-term equity incentive awards granted to our named executive officers was in the form of PSUs. During Fiscal 2023, our named executive officers were granted PSUs under our 2019 Plan in the following amounts:

 

Name

  Target Number of PSUs   

Grant Date

Fair Value

 

David A. Spector

  

 

42,210

 

  

 

$549,996

 

Doug Jones

  

 

21,105

 

  

 

$274,998

 

Vandad Fartaj

  

 

21,105

 

  

 

$274,998

 

Daniel S. Perotti

  

 

21,105

 

  

 

$274,998

 

William Chang

  

 

22,740

 

  

 

$274,998

 

Derek W. Stark

  

 

7,386

 

  

 

$96,240

 

With respect to the PSUs granted during Fiscal 2023 to our named executive officers, the performance measurement periods are the 2023, 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. Payout opportunity for these PSUs exists annually and cumulatively up to a maximum of 175% in any given year; provided, however, that we have satisfied the relevant performance goals and our named executive officer is providing services to our Company or an affiliate as of the relevant date. Additional details regarding the threshold, target and maximum payouts for the PSUs are provided in the “2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” included in this Proxy Statement.

PriorPursuant to vesting,our PSU award agreement, upon an RSU is generally subject to forfeiture uponexecutive officer’s termination of service other than for cause, or due to us. For RSUs granted prior to and during Fiscal 2015, the RSU award agreement provided that, upon a change in control (as defined in our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan)executive officer’s death or permanent disability, or upon the termination of ourthe management agreement between us and our Manager other than for cause (as defined in our management agreement), any RSUPSU not previously vested wouldwill become fully vested and settled in our common shares. The termfree of our management agreement expires on February 1, 2017,any transfer restrictions and any performance conditions imposed with respect to such PSU will be deemed to be fully achieved. Upon a termination of service for any other reason, a PSU is generally subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance withforfeiture. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the agreement. Upon further review of the change in control provisionsPSU award agreement, in the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee concluded in 2016 that replacing the existing single trigger vesting provision with double trigger vesting for certain typesevent of terminations would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee approved a new RSU award agreement on March 29, 2016 that contains a double trigger change in control provision that is applicable to certain types of terminations, as described further below. All of our executive officers awarded RSUs in 2016 were required to execute this new RSU award agreement and, as a further condition of such 2016 RSU awards, amend their prior RSU award agreements to redefine the change in control provision to include the double trigger feature. Pursuant to the new RSU award agreement, upon a change in control, any RSUPSU not previously vested shallwill become fully vested and free of transfer restrictions only if the executive officer’s service is terminated by the Companyus (other than for cause) as a result of or in connection with such change in control; provided, however, that if our shares cease to be publicly traded on an established securities market in connection with such change in control, then any PSUs not previously vested will become fully vested irrespective of any such termination of service.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement43


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

2023 Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Performance – Actual Performance and Payouts

The PSU targets and payouts earned as of March 12, 2024 for the Company’sFiscal 2023 performance period under the PSUs granted to our named executive officers in each of Fiscal 2021, Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2023 are reflected in the table below:

PSU Award

 2023 Target  2023 Actual  PSU Payout 
2021 PSU (FY 2021-2023)ROE = 10%

TSR =  50%

ROE = 11.1%

TSR = 78.5%

158.9%
2022 PSU (FY 2022-2024)ROE = 8%

TSR =  50%

ROE = 11.1%

TSR = 78.5%

187.5%
2023 PSU (FY 2023-2025)ROE = 8%

TSR = 40%-60%

ROE = 11.1%

TSR = 78.5%

150.0%

2023 Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Grants

Approximately 45% of the long-term equity incentive awards granted to our named executive officers was in the form of time-based RSUs. During Fiscal 2023, our named executive officers were granted RSUs under our 2019 Plan in the following amounts:

Name

  Number of RSUs  

Grant Date

Fair Value

David A. Spector

  34,535  $449,991

Doug Jones

  17,267  $224,989

Vandad Fartaj

  17,267  $224,989

Daniel S. Perotti

  17,267  $224,989

William Chang

  18,605  $224,993

Derek W. Stark

  

6,043

  

$78,740

Subject to continued service through each vesting date, the RSUs granted to our named executive officers in Fiscal 2023 generally vest ratably over a three-year period beginning on the one-year anniversary of the grant date (or such other date as determined by the Compensation Committee) and entitle the recipients to receive dividend equivalents during the vesting period.

Pursuant to our RSU award agreement, upon an executive officer’s termination of service other than for cause, or due to the executive officer’s death or permanent disability, or upon the termination of our management agreement between us and our Manager other than for cause (as defined in our management agreement), any RSU not previously vested will become fully vested and free of any transfer restrictions. Upon a termination of service for any other reason, an RSU is generally subject to forfeiture. In addition, pursuant to our RSU award agreement, in the event of a change in control, any RSU not previously vested will become fully vested if our named executive officer’s service is terminated by us (other than for cause) as a result of or in connection with such change in control; provided, however, that if our shares cease to be publicly traded on an established securities market in connection with such change in control, then any RSUs not previously vested shallwill become fully vested irrespective of any such termination of service.

Executive Compensation Decision Making Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for establishing the level of equity-based compensation for our named executive officers and employees of PFSI who provide services to us under our management agreement and other related party agreements. Members of the Compensation Committee are appointed by the Board. Currently, the Compensation Committee consists of three members of the Board, Mmes. Schultz, McAllister and Stewart, none of whom serve as our executive officers. Each of Mmes. Schultz, McAllister and Stewart qualifies as an independent trustee under the rules of the NYSE. See the section entitled “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—Committees of the Board of Trustees.” Each year, the Compensation Committee consults with PFSI when determining the level of equity-based compensation for employees of PFSI, including our named executive officers who provide services to us under our management agreement and other related party agreements. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides input for the Compensation Committee regarding

44 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

the performance and appropriate compensation of the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee gives considerable weight to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s evaluation of the other named executive officers because of his direct knowledge of each such officer’s performance and contributions.

The Role of the Outside Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, compensate and terminate any independent compensation consultant of its choosing in assessing our compensation program and determining the appropriate, competitive levels of compensation for our executive officers. Pursuant to such authority, the Compensation Committee utilized Pearl Meyer & Partners, or Pearl Meyer, as its independent compensation consultant during Fiscal 2023. Pearl Meyer has provided various services to the Compensation Committee since its engagement including the following:

Attended Compensation Committee meetings and prepared certain meeting materials in connection with such meetings;

Reviewed our peer group for executive compensation purposes and provided recommendations for changes to such peer group;

Evaluated the competitive positioning of our named executive officers’ long-term incentive compensation relative to our peer companies to support decision-making;

Advised on target award levels within the long-term incentive program and, as needed, on actual compensation actions;

Conducted a review of the competitive market data (including long-term incentive targets) for our named executive officers;

Assessed our executive compensation peer group and recommended changes as necessary;

Assessed compensation levels within our peer group for named executive officers and other executive officers;

Reviewed historical financial performance for peer group companies under metrics used in our long-term incentive plan;

Provided market research on various issues as requested by the Compensation Committee;

Consulted with our Compensation Committee regarding compensation strategy, internal communications related to equity compensation and compensation best practices;

Assisted in compensation plan designs and modifications, as requested;

Assessed whether our compensation programs might encourage inappropriate risk taking that could have a material adverse effect on us; and

Assisted with the preparation of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis for this Proxy Statement.

Assessment of Outside Independent Compensation Consultant Conflicts of Interest

Under rules promulgated by the SEC, the Compensation Committee must determine, after taking into account six independence-related factors, whether any work completed by a compensation consultant raised any conflict of interest. Factors considered by the Compensation Committee include the following six factors specified by the NYSE rules: (1) other services provided to us by the compensation consultant; (2) what percentage of the compensation consultant’s total revenue is made up of fees from us; (3) policies or procedures of the compensation consultant that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between individual consultants involved in the engagement and Compensation Committee members; (5) any of our common shares owned by individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the compensation consultant or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. For Fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee did not identify any conflict of interest with respect to Pearl Meyer.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement45


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Peer Group and Benchmarking

The Use of Peer Group and Competitive Market Data

On an annual basis, we engage in a comprehensive review of our peer companies with our independent compensation consultant. To assist in decision making regarding our compensation and benefits program, our management and the Compensation Committee review competitive market data from a “peer group” of publicly traded companies in specific industries in which we compete for executive talent, among other factors. The market data reviewed includes peer proxy data of companies similar in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication. Proxy data was gathered from proxy statements and other publicly filed documents.

How We Establish our Peer Group

The Compensation Committee reviewed its peer group used for evaluating compensation decisions based on objective criteria as presented in the table and discussion below.

Objective Criteria Considered

Former Peer Group

Peer Group

  Companies in the mortgage REIT industry

  Companies with market capitalizations within a reasonable range

  Companies with net income within a reasonable range

  Companies with revenue within a reasonable range

  Competitors for executive talent

  Companies of comparable scope and complexity

  Competitors for equity investor capital

  Companies that identify us as their direct peer

  Companies with similar pay practices

  Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.

  Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.

  ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.

  Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

  Chimera Investment Corporation

  Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

  KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.

  Ladder Capital Corp.

  MFA Financial, Inc.

  Rithm Capital Corp.

  New York Mortgage Trust

  Redwood Trust, Inc.

  Starwood Property Trust, Inc.

  Two Harbors Investment Corp.

  Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.

  Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.

  ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.

  Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

  Chimera Investment Corporation

Ellington Financial Inc. +

  Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

  KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.

  Ladder Capital Corp.

  MFA Financial, Inc.

  Rithm Capital Corp.

  New York Mortgage Trust

  Redwood Trust, Inc.

  Starwood Property Trust, Inc.

  Two Harbors Investment Corp.

+ Added to Peer Group

Given the relatively small number of externally managed REITs, we are limited in the number of companies that are appropriate peers for the Company. Our selection criteria included mortgage REITs and diversified REITs, and our goal is to identify peers that are industry relevant and publicly traded of similar market capitalization, assets and complexity.

As part of our selection criteria, we focus on companies that have 0.5x to 3x the assets of the Company.

Accordingly, the Compensation Committee, after reviewing with senior management and our independent outside compensation consultant, decided that Ellington Financial Inc. should be added to the revised peer group since it is a public mortgage and real estate investment manager meeting our qualitative and quantitative screening criteria including business comparability and executive compensation measures. The Compensation Committee believes that this revised peer group better reflects our competitors in the industry that currently conduct similar businesses and have comparable scales of operations.

Compensation Policies and Practices As They Relate to Our Risk Management

We have designed our executive compensation program to reward strong financial and individual performance. We believe that this structure, as further explained below, minimizes risks resulting from compensation practices. Our Compensation Committee believes that

46 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

its compensation policies and practices for our named executive officers do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. We believe that appropriate safeguards are in place with respect to our compensation program and policies that assist in mitigating excessive risk taking that could harm the value of our business or reward poor judgment by our executive officers. In that regard, the Compensation Committee requested assistance from our independent compensation consultants in reviewing our compensation policies and practices. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation policies and practices as they apply to our named executive officers are designed with an appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.

As part of the review, numerous factors were noted that reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking which include, but are not limited to, the following:

The compensation to our named executive officers consists solely of long-term equity awards in the form of PSUs and RSUs;

Our Compensation Committee has ultimate authority to determine, and adjust, if appropriate, compensation provided to our executive officers, including each of our named executive officers;

Our Compensation Committee maintains clawback policies regarding the recoupment of incentive compensation that apply to all of our Section 16 officers and any other officer whose title is Senior Managing Director;

Our named executive officers are subject to share ownership guidelines that require a certain minimum level of share ownership; and

Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain any advisor it deems necessary to fulfill its obligations.

Executive Share Ownership Guidelines

 

Our executive share ownership guidelines, which are approved by our CompensationNominating and Corporate Governance Committee, are intended to further the objective of aligning the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. TheThese share ownership guidelines provide that our NEOsnamed executive officers and other executive officers should accumulate a minimum numberdollar amount of shares over a specified time frame.within five years from becoming an executive officer.

The Compensation Committee consulted with Mercer to determine competitive market practice and then approvedA summary of the share ownership guidelines is set forth in the following executive officer share ownership guidelines:table:

 

Executive Officer Title

Share Ownership 
Guideline

Chief Executive Officer

$

Share Ownership2,000,000 

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer$2,000,000
Executive Managing Director, President and Chief Operating Officer$1,000,000

Other Executive Officers

$

500,000

For purposes of the guidelines, share ownership includes common shares owned directly restricted share awards, time-based RSUs and vested PSUs.RSUs. The types and amounts of share-based awards are intended, in part, to facilitate the accumulation of sufficient shares by our executivesexecutive officers to allow them to meet the share ownership guidelines within the applicable timeline. Each executive officer is expected to meet the respective level of share ownership within five years of becoming subject to such guidelines.Each of our executive officers is in compliance with the Company’s share ownership guidelines.The CompensationNominating and Corporate Governance Committee will annually review each executive officer’s compliance with or progress towardstoward meeting the share ownership guidelines based on share ownership calculated as of the average closing share price over the prior year. Each named executive officer who has been an executive officer for five years or more is in compliance with our share ownership guidelines.

Clawback Provisions

 

In September 2023, to comply with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act and the final NYSE listing rules, the Compensation Committee adopted a clawback policy applicable to incentive-based compensation for current and former Section 16 officers as defined under the Exchange Act (the “SEC Clawback Policy”). Under the SEC Clawback Policy, if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Board will recover any erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by current or former Section 16 officers during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date the Company determines that an accounting restatement is required. We also adopted a clawback policy in 2018 allowing for the recoupment of incentive compensation that applies to officers whose title is Senior Managing Director.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement47


 24

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

 

COMPENSATION TABLESTrading Controls and Anti-Pledging and Anti-Hedging Policies

 

2015Our named executive officers and trustees are required to obtain preclearance prior to entering into any transaction involving our securities. Trading is generally permitted only during open trading windows. Any such individuals who are subject to trading restrictions may enter into trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act, but these trading plans may be entered into only during an open trading window and must be pre-approved as well.

Our named executive officers, trustees and other employees (if any) are restricted from pledging any of our securities or entering into margin accounts involving our securities. We restrict these transactions because of the potential that sales of our securities could occur outside trading periods and without the required pre-clearance approval.

In addition, our named executive officers, trustees and other employees (if any) are restricted from entering into hedging transactions involving our securities.

48 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION TABLES  

Compensation Tables

2023 Summary Compensation Table*

 

We do not provide any of our named executive officers with any cash compensation or bonus, nor do we provide any named executive officers with pension benefits or nonqualified deferred compensation plans. We have not entered into any employment agreements with any person, and are not obligated to make any cash payments upon termination of employment or a change in control of us.

the Company.

During Fiscal 2015, we granted to2023, our named executive officers were granted long-term equity compensation in the form of RSUs and PSUs pursuant to our 2009 Equity Incentive2019 Plan. The “2015“2023 Summary Compensation Table” below listssummarizes the annual compensation forreceived by our named executive officers relating to equity awards received from us induring Fiscal 2015,2023, Fiscal 2014,2022 and Fiscal 2013.2021.

 

Name and Principal Position Year Stock Awards ($)(1) Total
($)
Stanford L. Kurland
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 2015 1,678,985 1,678,985
 2014 1,686,105 1,686,105
 2013 1,679,300 1,679,300
       

David A. Spector
Executive Managing Director, President and Chief Operating Officer

 2015 1,151,000 1,151,000
 2014 1,155,645 1,155,645
 2013 1,151,520 1,151,520
       
Vandad Fartaj
Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer
 2015 461,981 461,981
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 211,250 211,250
       

Anne D. McCallion
Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

 2015 383,980 383,980
 2014 385,215 385,215
 2013 260,000 260,000
       
Jeffrey P. Grogin
Senior Managing Director, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer and Secretary
 2015 311,988 311,988
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 211,250 211,250
       

Steve Bailey


Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Operations Officer

 2015 311,988 311,988
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 211,250 211,250
       
Andrew S. Chang
Senior Managing Director and Chief Business Development Officer
 2015 311,988 311,988
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 211,250 211,250
       
Doug Jones
Senior Managing Director and Chief Institutional Mortgage Banking Officer
 2015 311,988 311,988
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 211,250 211,250
       
Daniel S. Perotti (2)
Senior Managing Director and Chief Asset and Liability Management Officer
 2015 311,988 311,988
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 N/A N/A
       
David M. Walker
Senior Managing Director and Chief Risk Officer
 2015 311,988 311,988
 2014 313,645 313,645
 2013 211,250 211,250
 

 Name and Principal Position(1)

 

 

Year

 

     

Salary
($)
(2)

 

    

Stock Awards
($)
(2)

 

    

Total
 ($) 

 

 

David A. Spector

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Trustee

  2023     -    999,987     999,987  
  2022     -    999,985     999,985  
  2021     -    999,981     999,981  

Doug Jones

Trustee, President and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer

  2023     -    499,987     499,987  
  2022     -    499,977     499,977  
  2021     -    449,972     449,972  

Vandad Fartaj

Former Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer

  2023     -    499,987     499,987  
  2022     -    499,977     499,977  
  2021     -    499,990     499,990  

Daniel S. Perotti

Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

  2023          499,987     499,987  
  2022     -    399,988     399,988  
  2021     -    299,975     299,975  

William Chang

Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer

  2023     -    499,991     499,991  

Derek W. Stark

Senior Managing Director, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

  2023     -    174,980     174,980  
  2022     -    174,984     174,984  

——————

*

The columns for “Salary,” “Bonus,” “Option Awards,” “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,” “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings,” and “All Other Compensation” have been omitted because they are not applicable.

(1)

Named executive officer titles are as of December 31, 2023.

(2)

The amounts in this column represent the full grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of the PSUs and/or RSUs granted to our named executive officers in Fiscal 2015,2023, Fiscal 2014,2022 and Fiscal 20132021 pursuant to our 2009 Equity Incentive2019 Plan. For Fiscal 2023, the amount shown for PSUs is based on the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions on the grant date and includes PSUs awarded on March 20, 2023 and February 28, 2023. PSUs awarded on March 20, 2023 were in the target amount of 4,321 to Mr. Chang. PSUs awarded on February 28, 2023 were in the target amounts of 42,210 shares for Mr. Spector, 21,105 shares for Mr. Jones, 21,105 shares for Mr. Fartaj, 21,105 shares for Mr. Perotti, 8,442 shares for Mr. Chang and 7,386 shares for Mr. Stark. The value of the PSUs awarded on February 28, 2023, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved, is $962,487 for Mr. Spector, $481,237 for Mr. Jones, $481,237 for Mr. Fartaj, $481,237 for Mr. Perotti, $192,492 for Mr. Chang and $168,413 for Mr. Stark. The value of the PSUs awarded on March 20, 2023, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved is $164,999 for Mr. Chang. For more information on the assumptions used in our estimates of value, please refer toNote 30 – 22—Share-Based Compensation Plans in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2023, which was filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016.22, 2024.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement(2)Mr. Perotti was not a named executive officer in Fiscal 2013.49


 COMPENSATION TABLES  

 

25

20152023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards*

 

The following table provides information about our plan-based awards granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive2019 Plan to our named executive officers in Fiscal 2015.2023.

 

Name Grant
Date
 All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(#)(1)
 Grant Date
Fair Value of
Equity Awards
($)(2)
Stanford L. Kurland
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 78,641 1,678,985
David A. Spector
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 53,911 1,151,000
Vandad Fartaj
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988
Restricted Share Units November 16, 2015 9,572 149,993
Anne D. McCallion
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 17,985 383,980
Steve Bailey
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988
Andrew S. Chang
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988
Jeffrey P. Grogin
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988
Doug Jones
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988
Daniel S. Perotti
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988
David M. Walker
Restricted Share Units
 February 24, 2015 14,613 311,988

Name

 

  

Grant
Date

 

   

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)(2)
   

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
($)(3)

 

 
  

Threshold
(#)

 

   

Target
(#)

 

   

Maximum
(#)

 

 

 

David A. Spector

 

            

RSU

 

   

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

         

 

34,535

 

 

 

   

 

449,991

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

   

 

21,105

 

 

 

   

 

42,210

 

 

 

   

 

73,867

 

 

 

     

 

549,996

 

 

 

Doug Jones

 

            

RSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

17,267

 

 

 

   

 

224,989

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

10,552

 

 

 

   

 

21,105

 

 

 

   

 

36,933

 

 

 

     

 

274,998

 

 

 

Vandad Fartaj

 

            

RSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

17,267

 

 

 

   

 

224,989

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

10,552

 

 

 

   

 

21,105

 

 

 

   

 

36,933

 

 

 

     

 

274,998

 

 

 

 

Daniel S. Perotti

 

            

RSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

17,267

 

 

 

   

 

224,989

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

10,552

 

 

 

   

 

21,105

 

 

 

   

 

36,933

 

 

 

     

 

274,998

 

 

 

 

William Chang

 

            

RSU

 

   

 

 

3/20/2023

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

11,698

 

 

 

   

 

134,995

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

 

3/20/2023

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

7,149

 

 

 

   

 

14,298

 

 

 

   

 

25,021

 

 

 

     

 

164,999

 

 

 

RSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

6,907

 

 

 

   

 

89,998

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

4,221

 

 

 

   

 

8,442

 

 

 

   

 

14,773

 

 

 

     

 

109,999

 

 

 

 

Derek W. Stark

 

            

RSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

6,043

 

 

 

   

 

78,740

 

 

 

PSU

 

   

 

 

2/28/2023

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

3,693

 

 

 

   

 

7,386

 

 

 

   

 

12,925

 

 

 

        

 

96,240

 

 

 

——————

*

The columns for “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” “All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options,” and “Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards” have been omitted because they are not applicable.

(1)

Represents the potential payout range of PSUs granted in Fiscal 2023. Awards vest based on our ROE and Relative TSR for the fiscal year that ended immediately before such vesting date. Target was 100% of the granted Fiscal 2023 PSU and the maximum award amount was 175% of the granted Fiscal 2023 PSU. In addition to the performance conditions, our named executive officers must satisfy a time-based service condition in order for the award to vest.

(2)

Reflects the number of RSUs granted to theour named executive officer on February 24, 2015.28, 2023. These RSUs vest in equal annual installments for a four-yearthree-year period commencing on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.

(3)(2)

The grant date fair value of aan RSU shown in this column is determined in accordance with ASC 718. The amounts reported in this column with respect to PSUs are based on the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions.

50 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION TABLES  

 

26

20152023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End*

 

The following table provides information about outstanding equity awards ofheld by our named executive officers as of the end of Fiscal 2015.2023.

 

  Stock Awards

Name

Grant
Date

Number of Shares or
Units of Stock
Granted That Have
Not Vested
(#)(1)

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock
Granted That
Have Not Vested
($)(2)

Stanford L. Kurland02/24/201578,6411,200,062
06/03/201460,075916,745
 05/14/201335,000534,100
 05/16/201225,000381,500
    
David A. Spector02/24/201553,911822,682
 06/03/201441,175628,331
 05/14/201324,000366,240
 05/16/201216,750255,605
    
Vandad Fartaj11/16/20159,572146,069
 02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/14/20136,50099,190
 05/16/20123,75057,225
    
Anne D. McCallion02/24/201517,985274,451
 06/03/201413,725209,444
 05/14/20138,000122,080
 05/16/20124,37566,763
    
Steve Bailey02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/14/20136,50099,190
 05/16/20123,75057,225
    
Andrew S. Chang02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/14/20136,50099,190
 05/16/20123,75057,225
    
Jeffrey P. Grogin02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/14/20136,50099,190
 05/16/20123,75057,225
    
Doug Jones02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/14/20136,50099,190
 05/16/20123,75057,225
    
Daniel S. Perotti02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/15/20122,50038,150
    
David M. Walker02/24/201514,613222,994
 06/03/201411,175170,531
 05/14/20136,50099,190
 05/16/20123,75057,225
     Stock Awards 

Name

 Grant
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
Granted That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(1)
  Market Value of
Shares or
Units of Stock
Granted That
Have Not Vested
($)
(2)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Unearned Shares
or Units of Stock
Granted That
Have Not Vested
(#)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Market Value of
Unearned Shares
or Units of Stock
Granted That
Have Not Vested
($)
(2)
 

David A. Spector

  2/28/2023   34,535   516,298         
  2/28/2023           42,210(3)   631,040 
  2/25/2022   19,157   286,397         
  2/25/2022           23,414(4)   350,039 
  2/17/2021   7,878   117,776         
  2/17/2021           9,629(5)   143,954 

Doug Jones

  2/28/2023   17,267   258,142         
  2/28/2023           21,105(3)   315,520 
  2/25/2022   9,578   143,191         
  2/25/2022           11,707(4)   175,020 
  2/17/2021   3,545   52,998         
  2/17/2021           4,333(5)   64,778 

Vandad Fartaj

  2/25/2022   9,578   143,191         
  2/25/2022           11,707(4)   175,020 
  2/17/2021   3,939   58,888         
  2/17/2021           4,815(5)   71,984 

Daniel S. Perotti

  2/28/2023   17,267   258,142         
  2/28/2023           21,105(3)   315,520 
  2/25/2022   7,663   114,562         
  2/25/2022           9,366(4)   140,022 
  2/17/2021   2,364   35,342         
  2/17/2021           2,889(5)   43,191 

William Chang

  3/20/2023   11,698   174,885         
  3/20/2023           14,298(3)   213,755 
  2/28/2023   6,907   103,260         
  2/28/2023           8,442(3)   126,208 
  2/25/2022   3,832   57,288         
  2/25/2022           4,683(4)   70,011 

Derek W. Stark

  2/28/2023   6,043   90,343         
  2/28/2023           7,386(3)   110,421 
  2/25/2022   3,352   50,112         
  2/25/2023           4,098(4)   61,265 
  2/17/2021   1,182   17,671         
   2/17/2021           1,444(5)   21,588 

——————

*

The columns for “Option Awards,” “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - Options—Exercisable,” “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - Options—Unexercisable,” “Option Exercise Price,” and “Option Expiration Date” have been omitted because they are not applicable.

(1)

Reflects RSUs granted to each named executive officer, which units vest in equal annual installments for a four-yearthree-year period commencing on the one-year anniversary of the respective grant date.date for awards granted in Fiscal 2021, Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2023.

(2)

Per share value of stock awards is $15.26$14.95 based on the closing price of the common shares on the NYSE on December 29, 2023.

(3)

The indicated number of unearned units consists entirely of the PSUs with a performance period that ends on December 31, 2015.2025 and is described above under the heading “—Compensation Decisions Made in 2023.” The number of PSUs is shown at target.

(4)

The indicated number of unearned units consists entirely of the PSUs with a performance period that ends on December 31, 2024 and is described above under the heading “—Compensation Decisions Made in 2023.” The number of PSUs is shown at target.

(5)

The indicated number of unearned units consists entirely of the PSUs with a performance period that ends on December 31, 2023 and is described above under the heading “—Compensation Decisions Made in 2023.” The number of PSUs is shown at target.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement51


 COMPENSATION TABLES  

 

27

2015 Options Exercised and2023 Stock Vested*

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our named executive officers regarding the vesting of RSUs and PSUs during Fiscal 2015:2023.


   Stock Awards (1) 
Name  Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)
   Value Realized on Vesting
($)(2)
 
Stanford L. Kurland  86,275   1,630,900 
David A. Spector  57,475   1,084,550 
Anne D. McCallion  19,200   365,349 
Steve Bailey  15,725   298,928 
Andrew S. Chang  13,850   260,246 
Vandad Fartaj  15,100   286,034 
Jeffrey P. Grogin  13,850   260,246 
Doug Jones  10,725   195,778 
Daniel S. Perotti  7,475   143,200 
David M. Walker  15,100   286,034 
   Stock Awards(1) 

Name

  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
   

Value Realized
on Vesting

($)

 

David A. Spector

   81,004    1,139,080 

Doug Jones

   38,480    541,772 

Vandad Fartaj

   21,480    298,558 

Daniel S. Perotti

   31,504    443,713 

William Chang

   17,674    250,221 

Derek W. Stark

   13,554    190,520 

——————

*

The columns for “Option Awards” have been omitted because they are not applicable.

(1)

Amounts reported in these columns consist of vested RSUs. If the named executive officer sold a portion of the common shares acquired upon vesting of RSUs to satisfy the tax obligation with respect to such vesting, the number of common shares acquired is less than the amount shown. The number of common shares acquired and the value realized on vesting as reflected in this column have not been reduced to reflect the sale of common shares to satisfy any tax obligations. The following table shows the allocation of RSUs and PSUs that vested in Fiscal 2023.

  PSUs(a)     RSUs(b) 

Name

 

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting

(#)

  Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
     

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting

(#)

  Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(c)
 

David A. Spector

  58,353   833,281    22,651   305,799 

Doug Jones

  28,410   405,695    10,070   136,077 

Vandad Fartaj

  10,668   152,339    10,812   146,219 

Daniel S. Perotti

  23,921   341,592    7,583   102,121 

William Chang

  15,759   225,039    1,915   25,182 

Derek W. Stark

  9,828   140,344       3,726   50,176 

(a)

The payout percentages for PSUs earned as of March 12, 2024 for the Fiscal 2023 performance period under the PSUs granted to our named executive officers in each of Fiscal 2021, Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2023 were 158.9%, 187.5% and 150%, respectively.

(2)(b)Represents the product of

Amounts reported in this column represent RSU awards that vested on February 17, 2023, February 25, 2023 and March 3, 2023 for Messrs. Spector, Jones, Fartaj, Perotti, Chang and Stark.

(c)

The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of common shares acquired onreceived upon vesting andof RSUs by the closing pricefair market value of our Company’s common shares on the NYSE on therespective vesting date.dates.

20152023 Pension Benefits

 

The table for “Pension Benefits” has been omitted because it is not applicable. We do not provide any of our named executive officers with any pension plans or benefits.

20152023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

The table for “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” has been omitted because it is not applicable. We do not provide any of our named executive officers with any nonqualified deferred compensation plans or benefits.

 

52 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 COMPENSATION TABLES  

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change-in-Control

 

None of our named executive officers has the right to receive severance payments from us and we are not required to make payments to a named executive officer upon a change ofin control of us.the Company. However, all unvested RSUs we haveand PSUs granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive2019 Plan will vest immediately upon our change of control (as defined in our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan) followed by a termination of servicesservice other than for cause or due to death or disability or upon the termination of our management agreement between us and our Manager other than for cause (as defined in our management agreement). In addition, in the event of a change in control, any unvested RSUs and PSUs will become fully vested if the executive officer’s service is terminated by us (other than for cause) as a result of or in connection with such change in control; provided, however, that if our shares cease to be publicly traded on an established securities market in connection with such change in control, then any RSUs not previously vested will become fully vested irrespective of any such termination of service. The term of our management agreement expires on February 1, 2017,June 30, 2025, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Assuming that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2015,2023, the value of the RSUs and PSUs that vest for each named executive officer would be the same as the respective values set forth in the table presented in the section entitled “2015“2023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

Officer Departure

On March 3, 2023, the Company announced that Mr. Fartaj has ceased serving as its Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer. On March 21, 2023, the Company and Mr. Fartaj entered into a separation agreement and general release (the “Separation Agreement”) providing that in exchange for Mr. Fartaj’s release of claims and other terms all of Mr. Fartaj’s restricted stock units and performance stock units granted in 2021 and 2022 will continue to vest according to the original schedule contained in each equity award agreement. All other outstanding Company equity awards are forfeited under the Separation Agreement, including entitlement to any future equity awards. The payments and benefits to Mr. Fartaj under the Separation Agreement are subject to Mr. Fartaj complying with other obligations under the Separation Agreement, including a non-disparagement clause.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

Our Compensation Committee is comprised solely of the following independent Trustees: Mr. Willey, Chairman, andtrustees: Mmes. Schultz, McAllister and Stewart. None of them has ever served as an officer or employee of our Companyfor us or any of our affiliates or has any other business relationship or affiliation with our Company,us, except his or her service as a Trustee.trustee. During Fiscal 2015,2023, none of our executive officers served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers was a Trusteetrustee or a member of our Compensation Committee.

 

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement53


 CEO PAY RATIO  

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. David A. Spector, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

For Fiscal 2023:

 28 

the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our Company (other than our CEO) was $54,055; and

 

the annual total compensation of our CEO paid by our Company, as reported in our Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement, was $999,987.

Compensation Risks

Based on this information, our Fiscal 2023 ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 19 to 1.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps:

1.

We determined that, as of December 31, 2023, our employee population consisted of seven full-time individuals, who are located in the United States. In determining whether a worker is an employee, we applied widely recognized employment and tax laws. All seven employees were transferred into PMT effective in July 2023. Prior to July, PMT did not have any employees.

2.

In order to identify the median employee during Fiscal 2023, we compared the amount of salary, wages, overtime and other compensation of our employees as reflected in our payroll records. In making that determination, we annualized the compensation of our full-time employees.

3.

We combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2023 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $54,055 on an annualized basis.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

 

54 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE  
Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive “Compensation Actually Paid” and the financial performance of our Company. This disclosure does not necessarily align with how we view the relationship between the Company’s performance and named executive officer compensation. The below table shows Compensation Actually Paid to our CEO and other named executive officers as calculated by adjusting the Summary Compensation Table total amounts for the applicable year.
Year
 
 
Summary
Compensation
for CEO
(1)
 
  
Compensation
Actually Paid
to CEO
(2)
 
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
for Other
Named
Executive
Officers
(3)
 
  
Average
Compensation
Actually
Paid to Other
Named
Executive
Officers
(4)
 
  
Value of Initial Fixed
$100 Investment Based
On:
 
  
Net
Income
 
  
Return
on
Equity
(6)
 
 
 
PMT Total
Shareholder
Return
(5)
 
  
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
(5)
 
 
2023  $999,987   $ 1,678,774   $ 434,986   $ 694,272   $ 105.1   $ 79.2   $ 
157.8 Million
   11.1
2022  $999,985   $   649,981   $ 393,732   $ 262,972   $  77.2   $ 69.2   ($115.1) Million   -7.2
2021  $999.981   $   158,201   $ 424,977   $ 110,650   $  94.4   $ 91.5   $  25.9 Million   1.3
2020  $747,987   ($  254,463  $ 520,606   ($ 104,919  $  86.9   $ 77.8   $  27.4 Million   1.4
(1)Mr. Spector was our principal executive officer (“CEO”) for all years shown. The amounts reported are the amounts of total compensation reported for our CEO for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year.
(2)
The amount reported represent the Compensation Actually Paid to our CEO, computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
but do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our CEO in the applicable year. Compensation Actually Paid is calculated by making the following adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table amounts for our CEO:
Adjustments to Determine Compensation “Actually Paid” for the CEO
(7)
   
2023
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION - CEO
  $999,987 
  Deduction for Amounts Reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table
  ($999,987
  Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Fiscal Year that Remain Unvested as of Fiscal
Year-End
  $1,252,511 
  Change in Fair Value of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
Equity Awards that were Unvested as of Fiscal
Year-End
  $302,598 
  Change in Fair Value of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
Equity Awards that Vested during Fiscal Year
  $25,153 
  Change in Fair Value of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
Equity Awards that were Forfeited during Fiscal Year
   - 
  Dividends paid during Fiscal Year before Vesting Date of Equity Awards
  $98,512 
COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID - CEO
  
$
1,678,774
 
ADJUSTMENTS FROM SUMMARY COMPENSATION
  
$
678,787
 
(3)The amounts reported represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers as a group (excluding our CEO), in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The Executive Officers used to calculate the Other NEOs average in each year include Messrs. Kurland, Jones, Fartaj, and Chang (Andrew) for 2020; Messrs. Jones, Fartaj, Chang (Andrew) and Perotti for 2021; Messrs. Jones, Fartaj, Perotti and Stark for 2022 and Messrs. Jones, Fartaj, Perotti, Stark and Chang (William).
(4)
The amounts reported represent the average Compensation Actually Paid to the other named executive officers other than our CEO as a group, computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual average amount in compensation earned by or paid to such other named executive officers as a group in the applicable year. Compensation Actually Paid is calculated by making the following adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table amounts for the Other Named Executive Officers:
LOGO  | 
2024 Proxy Statement
55

 SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE  
Adjustments to Determine Average Compensation “Actually Paid” for the Other NEOs
(7)
   
2023
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION – OTHER NEOs
  $434,986 
  Deduction for Amounts Reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table
  ($434,986
  Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Fiscal Year that Remain Unvested as of Fiscal
Year-End
  $554,536 
  Change in Fair Value of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
Equity Awards that were Unvested as of Fiscal
Year-End
  $98,947 
  Change in Fair Value of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
Equity Awards that Vested during Fiscal Year
  $7,440 
  Change in Fair Value of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
Equity Awards that were Forfeited during Fiscal Year
   - 
  Dividends paid during Fiscal Year before Vesting Date of Equity Awards
  $33,349 
COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID – OTHER NEOs
  
$
694,272
 
ADJUSTMENTS FROM SUMMARY COMPENSATION
  
$
259,286
 
(5)
Based on initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2019 and a cumulative Total Shareholder Return (PMT Fiscal Year 2020 =
-13.1%,
Fiscal Year 2021 = 8.6%, Fiscal Year 2022 =
-18.2%,
Fiscal Year 2023 = 36.2%). The TSR Peer Group is the Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index (Fiscal Year 2020 =
-22.2%,
Fiscal Year 2021 = 17.6%, Fiscal Year 2022 =
-24.4%,
Fiscal Year 2023 = 14.5%). Amounts reported in the table in last year’s proxy have been updated from previously disclosed amounts of $81.76 for PMT Total Shareholder Return and $75.63 for Peer Group Total Shareholder Return for 2022 and $108.57 for PMT Total Shareholder Return and $117.61 for Peer Group Total Shareholder Return for 2021.
(6)Our Company Selected Measure is Return on Equity, which is calculated as Net Income attributable to common shareholders for a fiscal year divided by average monthly common shareholders’ equity.
(7)The fair values in the tables above have been computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes and, as applicable for awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, based on the probable outcome of such performance-based vesting conditions as of the last day of the fiscal year.
Most Important Financial Performance Measures
The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining if there are any inherent potential risksutilizes several performance measures and factors to align executive compensation with Company performance not reflected in the compensation programsPay Versus Performance table or the Compensation Actually Paid measures. In our assessment, the most important financial performance measures used to determine Compensation Actually Paid to our CEO and seeksother NEOs in Fiscal 2023 to structureCompany performance were:
Return on EquityNet IncomeShareholder Return
56
LOGO  | 
2024 Proxy Statement

 SEC PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE  
Compensation Actually Paid Compared to Financial Performance Measures
The graphs demonstrate the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid compared to TSR, Net Income and ROE.
Compensation Actually Paid and Company and Peer Group TSR
(1)
Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
Compensation Actually Paid and ROE
(1)
TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end of each fiscal year shown and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. The beginning of the measurement period for each year is the closing price on December 31, 2019.
 | 
2024 Proxy Statement
57


 PROPOSAL III—ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Proposal III—Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are presenting a proposal that gives shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote on our executive compensation program in a mannerfor named executive officers by voting for or against it. We currently present such proposals annually, and we expect the next proposal will be presented next year. At our 2023, 2022 and 2021 annual meetings of shareholders, approximately 98% of the shareholders voting on our Say-On-Pay proposal voted for the proposal. We believe that does not incentthis vote result was positively impacted by our transparency regarding the executive compensation paid to our executive officers by PFSI, which includes our Manager, our Servicer and their affiliates. We believe that our shareholders’ ability to take risksprovide input with respect to our executive compensation practices and disclosure continues to be an important element of good corporate governance, and will continue to consider the results of our Say-On-Pay vote in making our compensation decisions.

OUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION APPROVING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION:

“RESOLVED, that are reasonably likelythe compensation paid to have a material adverse effect onPennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the Company. During Fiscal 2015,compensation disclosure rules of the Compensation Committee granted only time-based RSUsSEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables and any narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement, is hereby APPROVED.”

Supporting Statement

We do not pay or accrue any annual base salaries or cash bonuses to our named executive officers. Rather, in our discretion, we may grant equity-based awards, which are designed to align the interests of named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders in generating attractive risk-adjusted returns and did not provide any cash compensation or bonuses. During Fiscal 2016, however, the Compensation Committee modified the composition of the long-term equity awards to include PSUs that vest only upon the Company’s satisfaction of performance measures tied to return on equity.growing book value over time. We believe that equity-based awards are consistent with our shareholders’align these interests in long-term Company performance and thatby allowing our named executive officers to share in the creation of value for our shareholders through capital appreciation and dividends.

These equity awards are therefore provided with lessgenerally subject to vesting requirements over a number of years, and they are designed to promote the retention of management and the achievement of high financial and individual performance. These awards provide a further benefit to us by enabling PFSI, including our Manager, our Servicer and their affiliates, to attract, motivate and retain highly talented executive leaders who are incented to implement strategies that will enhance our long-term performance and promote growth in dividends and book value.

We encourage our shareholders to read the section in this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in which we describe in greater detail our compensation program, objectives and policies for our named executive officers. For the reasons described therein and above, we recommend that our shareholders endorse our compensation program for named executive officers. While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from this proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

58 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Each of our executive officers is also an incentive to take short-term risksexecutive officer of PFSI and one or more of its subsidiaries, including our Manager and our Servicer, and each of our executive officers holds an incentive to take actions that will maximize shareholder value over time. Accordingly, we do not believe that our compensation policiesownership interest in PFSI. In addition, Mr. Spector and practices would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effectMr. Jones serve on our Company.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

PFSI’s Board of Directors. This section discusses certain direct and indirect relationships and transactions involving us and certain persons related to us. For a complete description of the management agreement, servicing agreement, mortgage banking and warehouse services agreement, MSR recapture agreement, spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreements and reimbursement agreement described below, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016 and is being made available to shareholders with this Proxy Statement.us since January 1, 2023.

Management Agreement

 

Management Agreement

We are externally managed and advised by our Manager pursuant to a management agreement, which was amended and restated effective February 1, 2013.June 30, 2020. Our management agreement requires our Manager to oversee our business affairs in conformity with the investment policies that are approved and monitored by our Board. Our Manager is responsible for our day-to-day management and will perform such services and activities related to our assets and operations as may be appropriate.

Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restatedour management agreement, our Manager collects a base management fee and may collect a performance incentive fee, both payable quarterly and in arrears. The management agreement expires on June 30, 2025, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The base management fee is calculated at a defined annualized percentage of “shareholders’ equity.” Our “shareholders’ equity” is defined as the sum of the net proceeds from any issuances of our equity securities since our inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance); plus our retained earnings at the end of the quarter; less any amount that we pay for repurchases or redemptions of our common shares (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance); and excluding one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between our Manager and us.

Pursuant to the terms of our management agreement, the base management fee is equal to the sum of (i) 1.5% per year of shareholders’ equity up to $2 billion, (ii) 1.375% per year of shareholders’ equity in excess of $2 billion and up to $5 billion, and (iii) 1.25% per year of shareholders’ equity in excess of $5 billion. The base management fee is paid in cash.

The performance incentive fee is calculated at a defined annualized percentage of the amount by which “net income,” on a rolling four-quarter basis and before deducting the incentive fee, exceeds certain levels of annualized return on our “equity.” For the purpose of determining the amount of the performance incentive fee, “net income” is defined as net income or loss attributable to our common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP and adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges determined after discussions between our Manager and us. For this purpose, “equity” is the weighted average of the issue price per common share of all of our public offerings of common shares, multiplied by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (including restricted share units issued under our equity incentive plans) in the four-quarter period.

The performance incentive fee is calculated quarterly and escalates as net income (stated as a percentage of return on equity) increases over certain thresholds. On each calculation date, the threshold amount represents a stated return on equity, plus or minus a “high watermark” adjustment. The performance fee payable for any quarter is equal to: (a) 10% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds (i) an 8% return on equity plus the high watermark, up to (ii) a 12% return on equity; plus (b) 15% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds (i) a 12% return on equity plus the high watermark, up to (ii) a 16% return on equity; plus (c) 20% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds a 16% return on equity plus the high watermark.

The “high watermark” is the quarterly adjustment that reflects the amount by which the net income (stated as a percentage of return on equity) in that quarter exceeds or falls short of the lesser of 8% and the average Fannie Mae MBS Yield (the target yield) for such quarter. If the net income is lower than the target yield, the high watermark is increased by the difference. If the net income is higher than the target yield, the high watermark is reduced by the difference. Each time a performance incentive fee is earned, the high watermark returns to zero. As a result, the threshold amount required for our Manager to earn a performance incentive fee is adjusted cumulatively based on the performance of our net income over (or under) the target yield, until the net income in excess of the target yield exceeds the then-current cumulative high watermark amount, and a performance incentive fee is earned. The performance incentive fee may be paid in cash or in our common shares (subject to a limit of no more than 50% paid in common shares), at our option.

Our Manager is also entitled to reimbursement of its organizational and operating expenses, including third-party expenses, incurred on our behalf. Pursuantbehalf, it being understood that our Manager and its affiliates shall allocate a portion of their personnel’s time to provide certain legal, tax and investor relations services for our direct benefit and for which our Manager shall be reimbursed $165,000 per fiscal quarter, such amount to be reviewed annually and not preclude reimbursement for any other services performed by our Manager or its affiliates.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement59


 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

The Company is required to pay our and our subsidiaries’ pro rata portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses of our Manager and its affiliates required for our and our subsidiaries’ operations. These expenses are allocated based on the termsratio of our and our subsidiaries’ proportion of gross assets compared to all remaining gross assets managed by our Manager as calculated at each fiscal quarter end.

Our Manager may also be entitled to a termination fee under certain circumstances. Specifically, the termination fee is payable for (1) our termination of our management agreement without cause, (2) our Manager is entitled to grant discretionary waivers of certain overhead expenses that otherwise would be allocable to us. On December 15, 2015, we amended our management agreement to provide for a cap on the overhead expenses incurred by our Manager in any quarter and reimbursable by us. The termManager’s termination of our management agreement expires on February 1, 2017, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlierupon a default by us in accordance with the termsperformance of any material term of the agreement.agreement that has continued uncured for a period of 30 days after receipt of written notice thereof, or (3) our Manager’s termination of the agreement after the termination by us without cause (excluding a non-renewal) of our MBS agreement, our MSR recapture agreement or our servicing agreement (each as described and/or defined below). The termination fee is equal to three times the sum of (a) the average annual base management fee and (b) the average annual (or, if the period is less than 24 months, annualized) performance incentive fee earned by our Manager during the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of termination.

We may terminate the management agreement without the payment of any termination fee under certain circumstances, including, among other circumstances, uncured material breaches by our Manager of the management agreement, upon a change in control of our Manager (defined to include a 50% change in the shareholding of our Manager in a single transaction or related series of transactions) or upon the termination of our MBS agreement, our MSR recapture agreement or our servicing agreement by our Servicer without cause.

Our management agreement also provides that, prior to the undertaking by our Manager or its affiliates of any new investment opportunity or any other business opportunity requiring a source of capital with respect to which our Manager or its affiliates will earn a management, advisory, consulting or similar fee, our Manager shall present to us such new opportunity and the material terms on which our Manager proposes to provide services to us before pursuing such opportunity with third parties.

Our Manager earned approximately $22.9$28.8 million in base management fees and $1.3 millionzero in performance incentive fees in Fiscal 20152023 in connection with work performed under theour management agreement with us.agreement.

Servicing Agreement

 

Servicing Agreement

We have entered into a loan servicing agreement, with our Servicerwhich was amended and restated effective June 30, 2020, and pursuant to which our Servicer provides servicingsubservicing for our portfolioportfolios of residential mortgage loans. Theloans and mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs. Such loan servicing and subservicing provided by our Servicer includes collecting principal, interest and escrow account payments, if any, with respect to mortgage loans, as well as managing loss mitigation, which may include, among other things, collection activities, loan workouts, modifications, foreclosures and short sales. Our Servicer also engages in certain loan origination activities that include refinancing mortgage loans and financings that facilitate sales of real estate owned properties,acquired in settlement of loans, or REOs. The term of our servicing agreement as amended, expires on February 1, 2017,June 30, 2025, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The base servicing fee rates for non-distressed mortgage loans subserviced by our Servicer on our behalf are calculated through a monthly per-loan dollar amount, with the actual dollar amount for each mortgage loan based on whether the mortgage loan is a fixed-rate or adjustable-rate loan. The base servicing fee rates for mortgage loans subserviced on our behalf are $7.50 per month for fixed-rate mortgage loans and $8.50 per month for adjustable-rate mortgage loans. To the extent that these mortgage loans become delinquent, our Servicer is entitled to an additional servicing fee per mortgage loan falling within a range of $10 to $55 per month and based on the delinquency, bankruptcy and foreclosure status of the mortgage loan or $75 per month if the underlying mortgaged property becomes REO. Our Servicer is also entitled to customary ancillary income and certain market-based fees and charges, including boarding and deboarding fees, liquidation and disposition fees, and assumption, modification and origination fees. In addition, our Servicer is entitled to fees required as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic such as a one-time forbearance set up fee of $10, a $3 per month forbearance monitoring fee and certain modification fees ranging from $125 to $675.

The base servicing fee rates for distressed whole mortgage loans are charged based on a monthly per-loan dollar amount, with the actual dollar amount for each loan based on the delinquency, bankruptcy and/or foreclosure status of such loan or whether the underlying mortgage property has become REO. The base servicing fee rates for distressed whole mortgage loans range from $30 per month for current loans up to $95 per month for loans where foreclosure proceedings have commenced. The base servicing fee rate for REO is $75 per month. To the extent that we rent our REO under our REO rental program, our Servicer is entitled to an REO rental fee of $30 per month per REO, an REO property lease renewal fee of $100 per lease renewal, and a property management fee in an amount equal to our Servicer’s cost if property management services and/or any related software costs are outsourced to a third-party property management firm or 9% of gross rental income if our Servicer provides property management services directly. Our Servicer is also entitled to retain any

60 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

tenant paid application fees and late rent fees and seek reimbursement for certain third-party vendor fees. Our Servicer is also entitled to certain activity-based fees for distressed whole mortgage loans that are charged based on the achievement of certain events. These fees range from $750 for a streamline modification to $1,750 for a liquidation and $500 for a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Our Servicer is not entitled to earn more than one liquidation fee, re-performance fee or modification fee per loan in any 18-month period.

Because we have limited employees and infrastructure, our Servicer is required to provide a range of services and activities significantly greater in scope than the services provided in connection with a customary servicing arrangement. For these services, our Servicer receives a supplemental servicing fee of $25 per month for each distressed loan.

Except as otherwise provided in our MSR recapture agreement, when our Servicer effects a refinancing of a loan on our behalf and not through a third-party lender and the resulting loan is readily saleable, or our Servicer originates a loan to facilitate the disposition of the real estate acquired by us in settlement of a loan, our Servicer is entitled to receive from us market-based fees and compensation consistent with pricing and terms our Servicer offers unaffiliated third parties on a retail basis.

Our Servicer continues to be entitled to reimbursement for all customary, bona fide reasonable and necessary out-of-pocket expenses it incurs in connection with the performance of its servicing obligations.

Our Servicer earned from us approximately $46.4$81.3 million in loan servicing fees from us in Fiscal 2015.2023.

Mortgage Banking Services Agreement

 

Mortgage Banking and Warehouse Services Agreement

We have also entered intoPursuant to a mortgage banking and warehouse services agreement, pursuant toor MBS agreement, which was amended and restated effective June 30, 2020, our Servicer provides us with certain mortgage banking services, including fulfillment and disposition-related services, with respect to loans acquired by us from correspondent lenders,sellers.

Pursuant to the MBS agreement, our Servicer has agreed to provide such services exclusively for our benefit, and our Servicer and its affiliates are prohibited from providing such services for any other third party. However, such exclusivity and prohibition shall not apply, and certain warehouse lending services, including fulfillment and administrative services, with respectother duties instead will be imposed upon our Servicer, if we are unable to purchase or finance mortgage loans financed by usas contemplated under our MBS agreement for our warehouse lending clients.any reason. The term of our mortgage banking and warehouse servicesMBS agreement expires, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement, on February 1, 2017,June 30, 2025, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

In consideration for the mortgage banking services provided with respect to our acquisition of mortgage loans, our Servicer is entitled to aggregate quarterly fulfillment fees not to exceed the following: (i) the number of loan commitments multiplied by a pull-through factor of either .99 or .80 depending on whether the loan commitments are subject to a “mandatory trade confirmation” or a “best efforts lock confirmation” and then multiplied by $585 for each pull-through adjusted loan commitment up to and including 16,500 per quarter and $355 for each pull-through adjusted loan commitment in excess of 16,500 per quarter, plus (ii) $315 multiplied by the number of purchased loans up to and including 16,500 per quarter and $195 multiplied by the number of purchased loans exceeding 16,500 per quarter, plus (iii) $750 multiplied by the number of all purchased loans other than Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans that are sold and securitized; provided, however, that no fulfillment fee shall be due or payable to PLS with respect to any Ginnie Mae loans, and as of October 1, 2022, designated Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans acquired by PLS. We do not hold the Ginnie Mae approval required to issue Ginnie Mae MBS and act as a servicer. Accordingly, under the MBS agreement, our Servicer purchases loans underwritten in accordance with the Ginnie Mae Mortgage-Backed Securities Guide “as is” and without recourse of any kind from us at our cost less an administrative fee plus accrued interest and a sourcing fee ranging from one to two basis points. PLS may also purchase conventional loans from us at our mutual consent subject to the same sourcing fees and other terms as their purchases of Ginnie Mae loans.

In consideration for the mortgage banking services provided by our Servicer with respect to our acquisition of mortgage loans under our Servicer’s early purchase program, our Servicer is entitled to fees accruing (i) at a rate equal to $1,500 per year per early purchase facility administered by our Servicer, and (ii) in the amount of $35 for each mortgage loan that we acquire thereunder.

Notwithstanding any provision of the MBS agreement to the contrary, if it becomes reasonably necessary or advisable for our Servicer to engage in additional services in connection with post-breach or post-default resolution activities for the purposes of a correspondent agreement, then we have generally agreed with our Servicer to negotiate in good faith for additional compensation and reimbursement of expenses to be paid to our Servicer for the performance of such additional services.

Our Servicer earned approximately $58.6$27.8 million in fulfillment fees in Fiscal 2015 under mortgage banking and warehouse services agreements with us, and our Servicer paid to us approximately $9.0$7.2 million in sourcing fees in Fiscal 2015.2023.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement61


 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

MSR Recapture Agreement

 

29

 

MSR Recapture Agreement

Effective February 1, 2013, we entered into an MSR recapture agreement with our Servicer. Pursuant to the terms of our MSR recapture agreement entered into by us with our Servicer and amended and restated effective June 30, 2020, if our Servicer refinances via its consumer direct lending businessoriginates any mortgage loans the proceeds of which are used to refinance mortgage loans for which we previously held the related mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs (the “recaptured loans”), our Servicer is generally required to transfer and convey to us, without cost, to us, the MSRs with respect to certain new mortgage loans originated in those refinancings (or, under certain circumstances, other mortgage loans). In certain circumstances, our Servicer may, at its option, wire cash to us in an amounton a monthly basis a tiered recapture fee. Such fee shall be equal to 40% of the fair market value of the MSRs relating to the recaptured loans subject to the first 15% of the “recapture rate,” 35% of the fair market value of the MSRs relating to the recaptured loans subject to the recapture rate in lieuexcess of transferring15% and up to 30%, and 30% of the fair market value of the MSRs relating to the recaptured loans subject to the recapture rate in excess of 30%. The “recapture rate” means, during each month, the ratio of (i) the aggregate unpaid principal balance of all recaptured loans, to (ii) the aggregate unpaid principal balance of all mortgage loans for which we held the MSRs and that were refinanced or otherwise paid off in such MSRs. The termmonth. Our Servicer has further agreed to allocate sufficient resources to achieve a recapture rate of ourat least 15%.

The MSR recapture agreement expires, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement, on February 1, 2017,June 30, 2025, subject to automatic renewal for additional 18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Our Servicer paid us $787,000

We recognized $1.8 million in MSR recapture fees during Fiscal 2015.2023.

Spread Acquisition and MSR Servicing Agreements

Effective February 1, 2013, we entered into a master spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreement, or the 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement, pursuant to which we may acquire from our Servicer the rights to receive certain excess servicing spread, or ESS, arising from MSRs acquired by our Servicer from banks and other third party financial institutions. Our Servicer is generally required to service or subservice the related mortgage loans for the applicable agency or investor. The terms of each transaction under the 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement are subject to the terms thereof, as modified and supplemented by the terms of a confirmation executed in connection with such transaction. On December 19, 2014, we entered into a second master spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreement with our Servicer, or the 12/19/14 Spread Acquisition Agreement. The terms of the 12/19/14 Spread Acquisition Agreement are substantially similar to the terms of the 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement, except that we only intend to purchase ESS relating to Freddie Mac MSRs under the 12/19/14 Spread Acquisition Agreement. On April 30, 2015, we amended and restated a third master spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreement with our Servicer, or the 4/30/15 Spread Acquisition Agreement. The terms of the 4/30/15 Spread Acquisition Agreement are substantially similar to the terms of the 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement and the 12/19/14 Spread Acquisition Agreement, except that we only intend to purchase ESS relating to Ginnie Mae MSRs under the 4/30/15 Spread Acquisition Agreement. On February 29, 2016, the parties terminated the 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement and all amendments thereto. In connection with the termination of the 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement, our Servicer reacquired from us all of its right, title and interest in and to all of the Fannie Mae ESS previously sold by our Servicer to us and then subject to such 2/1/13 Spread Acquisition Agreement. On February 29, 2016, our Servicer also reacquired from us all of its right, title and interest in and to all of the Freddie Mae ESS previously sold by our Servicer to us and then subject to such 12/19/14 Spread Acquisition Agreement.

In connection with our entry into the 4/30/15 Spread Acquisition Agreement, we were also required to amend and restate the terms of a Security and Subordination Agreement, or the Security Agreement, with Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, or CSFB. Under the terms of the Security Agreement, we pledged to CSFB our rights under the 4/30/15 Spread Acquisition Agreement and our interest in any ESS purchased thereunder. The Security Agreement is required as a result of a separate repurchase agreement between our Servicer and CSFB, pursuant to which our Servicer finances Ginnie Mae MSRs and servicing advance receivables and pledges to CSFB all of its rights and interests in any Ginnie Mae MSRs it owns or acquires, and a separate acknowledgement with respect thereto, by and among Ginnie Mae, CSFB and our Servicer. As a condition to permitting our Servicer to transfer to us the ESS relating to a portion of those pledged Ginnie Mae MSRs, CSFB requires such transfer to be subject to CSFB’s continuing lien on the ESS, the pledge and acknowledgement of which were effected pursuant to the Security Agreement. CSFB’s lien on the ESS remains subordinate to the rights and interests of Ginnie Mae pursuant to the provisions of the 4/30/15 Spread Acquisition Agreement and the terms of the acknowledgement agreement.

During Fiscal 2015, we purchased $271.6 million in ESS from PFSI and received $78.6 million in repayments of ESS from PFSI. During Fiscal 2015, we also earned $7.0 million in ESS recapture income.

Loan and Security Agreement

In connection with the Security Agreement and the repurchase agreement described above, we entered into an underlying loan and security agreement with our Servicer, dated as of April 30, 2015, or the Underlying LSA, pursuant to which we may borrow up to $150 million from our Servicer for the purpose of financing our investment in ESS. In order to secure our borrowings, we pledge our ESS to our Servicer under the Underlying LSA, and our Servicer, in turn, re-pledges such ESS to CSFB under the repurchase agreement. We have agreed with our Servicer in connection with the Underlying LSA that we are required to repay our Servicer the principal amount of borrowings plus accrued interest to the date of such repayment, and our Servicer, in turn, is required to repay CSFB the corresponding amount under the repurchase agreement.

During Fiscal 2015, we paid our Servicer $3.3 million in interest to finance ESS under the Underlying LSA and our Servicer, in turn, paid an identical amount to CSFB under the repurchase agreement pursuant to which it finances the related MSRs.

30

Loan Purchase AgreementsAgreement

 

We have entered into a mortgage loan purchase agreement and a flow commercial mortgage loan purchase agreement with our Servicer. Currently, we use the mortgage loan purchase agreement for the purpose of acquiring prime jumbo residential mortgage loans originated by our Servicer through its consumer direct lending business. We use the flow commercial mortgageServicer. The loan purchase agreement for the purpose of acquiring small balance commercial mortgage loans, including multifamily mortgage loans, originated by our Servicer as part of our commercial lending business. Each of the loan purchase agreements contains customary terms and provisions, including representations and warranties, covenants, repurchase remedies and indemnities. The purchase prices we would pay our Servicer for such loans are market-based.

During Fiscal 2015,2023, we purchaseddid not purchase any residential loans from our Servicer under the mortgage loan purchase agreement residential mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of $13.2 million at an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million and under the flow commercial mortgage loan purchase agreement, commercial mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of $14.5 million at an aggregate purchase price of $14.8 million.agreement.

Reimbursement Agreement

In connection with the initial public offering of our common shares on August 4, 2009, or the IPO, we entered into an agreement with our Manager pursuant to which we agreed to reimburse our Manager for the $2.9 million payment that it made to the underwriters for the IPO, or the Conditional Reimbursement, if we satisfied certain performance measures over a specified period of time. Effective February 1, 2013, we amended the terms of the reimbursement agreement to provide for the reimbursement of our Manager of the Conditional Reimbursement if we are required to pay our Manager performance incentive fees under our management agreement. In the event the termination fee is payable to our Manager under our management agreement and our Manager and the underwriters have not received the full amount of the reimbursements and payments under the reimbursement agreement, such amount will be paid in full. The term of the reimbursement agreement expires on February 1, 2019. Our Manager received reimbursement payments from us under this agreement totaling $237,000 during Fiscal 2015.

Approval of Related Party Transactions

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, available on our website at pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com, requires everyone subject to the code to be scrupulous in avoiding a conflict of interest as it relates to our interests and the interests of our officers and Trusteestrustees or the interests of the employees, officers and directors of PFSI and its affiliates, including our Manager and our Servicer, when such individuals are acting for or on our behalf. The code prohibits us from, among other things, entering into a transaction or a business relationship with such a related party or an immediate family member of such related person or with a company in which such a related party or such immediate family member has a substantial financial interest, unless such transaction and relationship are disclosed to and approved in advance by our Board.

We have also adopted a written policy that specifically governs related party transactions. The related party transactions policy generally prohibits any related party transaction unless it is reviewed and approved by our Related Party Matters Committee and/or a majority of our independent Trusteestrustees in accordance with the policy. With certain exceptions, a related party transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which we (including any of our subsidiaries) were, are or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in the aggregate in any calendar year, and in which any related party has, had or will have a direct or indirect interest. A related party is any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year was, a Trusteetrustee or executive officer of our Company or a nominee to become a Trusteetrustee of our Company; any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities; any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons (which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of any of the foregoing persons); and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Related Party Matters Committee and/or independent Trusteestrustees consider all facts and circumstances that they deem relevant to the transaction, including, among other things, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. The Related Party Matters Committee has also retained the services of an independent consultant who assists the Related Party Matters Committee in reviewing certain related party transactions.

The related party transactions policy governs the process for identifying potential related party transactions and seeking review, approval and/or ratification of such transactions. In addition, each of our Trusteestrustees and executive officers is required to complete an annual disclosure questionnaire and report all transactions with us in which they and their immediate family members had or will have a direct or indirect material interest with respect to us. We review these questionnaires and, if we determine that it is necessary, discuss any reported transactions with our Related Party Matters Committee and/or our Board in accordance with the related party transactions policy.

 

62 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K  

 

31

REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

The Audit and Compliance Committee met eight times in 2015. The Audit and Compliance Committee’s agenda is established by the Chairman of the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and reviewed with our Chief Financial Officer and our independent registered public accounting firm the overall audit scope and plans, the results of the external audit examination, evaluations by our independent registered public accounting firm of our internal controls and the quality of our financial reporting.

The Audit and Compliance Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit and Compliance Committee also discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm other matters required to be discussed by a registered public accounting firm with the Audit and Compliance Committee under applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (required communication with the Audit Committee). The Audit and Compliance Committee received and discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm its annual written report on its independence from us and our management, which is made pursuant to applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and considered with our independent registered public accounting firm whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with our independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.

In performing all of these functions, the Audit and Compliance Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and, necessarily, in its oversight role, the Audit and Compliance Committee relies on the work and assurances of our management, which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of our independent registered public accounting firm, which, in its report, expresses an opinion on the conformity of our annual financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of year-end.

In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit and Compliance Committee recommended to our Board of Trustees, and our Board of Trustees approved, the inclusion of our audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016.

The foregoing report has been furnished by the current members of the Audit and Compliance Committee:

Randall D. Hadley, Chairman
Scott W. Carnahan
Preston DuFauchard

32

PROPOSAL I
ELECTION OF TRUSTEES

We are presenting a proposal to elect two (2) Class I Trustees identified inFiscal 2023, which contains our consolidated financial statements for Fiscal 2023, accompanies this Proxy Statement, each forbut is not a term expiring at our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders, subject to the election and qualification of their successors or to their earlier death, resignation or removal.

OUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR SCOTT W. CARNAHAN AND FRANK P. WILLEY AS TRUSTEES TO SERVE UNTIL OUR 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND UNTIL THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS ARE DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFIED.

The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote to elect Scott W. Carnahan and Frank P. Willey as Class I Trustees, unless you specify a contrary choice or withhold the authority of these persons to vote for the election of any or all of the nominees by marking the proxy to that effect.

33

PROPOSAL II
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We are presenting a proposal to ratify the appointmentpart of our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP and its affiliated entities, or Deloitte, which has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our formation in May 2009. During this time, Deloitte has performed accounting and auditing services for us. We expect that representativessoliciting materials. Shareholders of Deloitte will be present at the Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. If the appointment of Deloitte is not ratified, the Audit and Compliance Committee will reconsider the appointment.

OUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OUR AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMEND A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In addition to performing the audits of our financial statements in Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, Deloitte provided other audit-related and non-audit-related services for us during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014.

Fees to Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2015 and 2014

The following table shows the fees billed by Deloitte for the audit and other services it provided to us in respect of Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014.

  2015  2014 
Audit Fees(1) $2,114,927  $1,768,638 
Audit-Related Fees(2)  155,032   73,750 
Tax Fees(3)  196,560   233,622 
All Other Fees  65,000    
Total $2,531,519  $2,076,010 

——————

(1)Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered during the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting, for the reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and during the audit of the annual financial statements of certain of our subsidiaries.

(2)Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for professional services provided for the review of our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3, including any amendments, the issuance of comfort letters and consents in connection with SEC filings and other contemplated transactions during the year.

(3)Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit and Compliance Committee approved all services performed by Deloitte during Fiscal 2015 in accordance with applicable SEC requirements. The Audit and Compliance Committee has also pre-approved the use of Deloitte for certain audit-related and non-audit-related services, setting a specific limit on the amount of such services that we may obtain from Deloitte before additional approval is necessary. In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee has delegated to the chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee the authority to approve both audit-related and non-audit-related services provided by Deloitte, provided that the chair will present any decision to the full Audit and Compliance Committee for ratification at its next scheduled meeting.

34

PROPOSAL III
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are presenting a proposal that gives shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote on our executive compensation for named executive officers by voting for or against it. At our 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, an overwhelming majority of the votes cast, approximately 94%, were voted in favor of approving our executive compensation. We consider this vote as supportive of our executive compensation and, accordingly, have not made any changes in response thereto. At our 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholders were also asked to vote on whether the say-on-pay vote should be held annually, every two years or every three years. A majority of our shareholders indicated a preference for holding such vote on an annual basis. As a result, our Board determined that we will hold an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve our executive compensation every year until the next vote in 2017 regarding the frequency of future say-on-pay votes.

OUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION APPROVING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables and any related materials disclosed in this Proxy Statement, is hereby APPROVED.”

Supporting Statement

We do not pay or accrue any annual base salaries or cash bonuses to our named executive officers. Rather, in our discretion, we may grant equity-based awards, which are designed to align the interests of named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders in growing dividends and book value over time. We believe equity-based awards align these interests by allowing our named executive officers to share in the creation of value for our shareholders through capital appreciation and dividends.

These equity awards are generally subject to vesting requirements over a number of years, and they are designed to promote the retention of management and the achievement of high Company and individual performance. These awards provide a further benefit to us by enabling our Manager and Servicer to attract, motivate and retain highly talented executive leaders who are incented to implement strategies that will enhance our long-term performance and promote growth in dividends and book value.

We encourage our shareholders to read the section in this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in which we describe in greater detail our compensation program, objectives and policies for our named executive officers. For the reasons described above, we recommend that our shareholders endorse our compensation program for named executive officers. While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from this proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

35

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

We believe that based solely upon our review of copies of forms we have received or written representations from reporting persons, during Fiscal 2015, all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act applicable to our officers, Trustees and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our common shares were complied with on a timely basis.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We make these materials available on our website, www.pennymac-reit.com, under “SEC Filings,” free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the SEC.

These SEC filings are available to the public at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

We will provide, without charge to each record or beneficial holder of our common shares as of the record date may obtain, without charge, a paper copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2015the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, without the accompanying exhibits, upon written request to Investor Relations, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361. A list of exhibits is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and exhibits are available from us upon the payment to us of the cost of furnishing them. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available on our website, pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com, under “SEC Filings.”

Other Matters

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

 

OTHER MATTERS

We believe that based solely upon our review of copies of forms we have received or written representations from reporting persons, during Fiscal 2023, all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act applicable to our officers, trustees and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our common shares were complied with on a timely basis.

Other Matters for Consideration at the Annual Meeting

 

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, our Board does not know of any matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than as described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your signed proxy card authorizes Stanford L. Kurland,David A. Spector, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey P. Grogin,Derek W. Stark, our Secretary, to vote on those matters according to their best judgment.

Householding of Proxy Materials

The

As permitted by the SEC, permits us towe will deliver a single copy of the notice, proxy statement and annual report to shareholders who have the same address and last name, unless we have received contrary instructions from such shareholders. Each shareholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, called “householding,” will reduce the volume of duplicate information you receive and reduce our printing and postage costs, which is consistent with our corporate sustainability efforts. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report to any such shareholder upon written or oral request. A shareholder wishing to receive a separate proxy statement or annual report can notify us at Investor Relations, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, telephone: (818) 224-7028. Similarly, shareholders currently receiving multiple copies of these documents can request the elimination of duplicate documents by contacting us as described above.

 

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement63


 INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

Information Concerning Voting and Solicitation

General Meeting Information

 

 

The 2024 Annual Meeting will be conducted online via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024 on Wednesday, June 12, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time, subject to any postponements or adjournments thereof. The Board is soliciting proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting. Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials primarily via the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies of these materials to each shareholder. On or about April 19, 2024, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials, vote, and request paper copies of the proxy materials. Access to the proxy materials and online voting will be available at www.proxyvote.com. We believe this process expedites shareholders’ receipt of the proxy materials, lowers the cost of printing and distribution, and reduces the environmental impact associated with the Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on June 12, 2024

This Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2023, are available at www.proxyvote.com. At this website, you will find a complete set of the following proxy materials: Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders and form proxy card. You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before submitting a proxy or voting at the Annual Meeting.

What am I voting on?

You will be entitled to vote on the following scheduled proposals at the Annual Meeting:

The election of three (3) Class III trustees, David A. Spector, Doug Jones and Catherine A. Lynch each for a term expiring at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders;

The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024; and

The approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation.

How does our Board of Trustees recommend that I vote on these proposals?

Our Board of Trustees, or the Board, recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of Proposals I, II and III.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

Our Board has set April 17, 2024 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. The 2024 Annual Meeting will be conducted online via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024 on Wednesday, June 12, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time, subject to any postponements or adjournments thereof.

To be admitted to the Annual Meeting virtually, you will need to log-in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024 using

the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or email, as applicable, previously sent or made available to shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Online access to the audio webcast will open 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to allow time for you to log-in and test your device’s audio system. We encourage you to access the meeting in advance of the designated start time. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the 2024 Annual Meeting or during the meeting time, please call the technical support number on the virtual meeting site. Shareholders may submit questions related to the items of business set forth on the agenda in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending an email to investorrelations@pennymac.com (shareholders are asked to include the full name of the account holder so we can confirm your status as a shareholder). Questions must be received by 5:00 PM PT on June 11, 2024.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

If you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof. As of the record date, 86,845,447 common shares were issued and outstanding.

You are entitled to one vote on each proposal for each common share you held on the record date.

64 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

The presence in person (virtually via live webcast) or by proxy of shareholders entitled to cast a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting on any matter constitutes a quorum, which is required in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, we expect that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies.

What shareholder approvals are required to approve the proposals?

Proposal I. Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of trustees in an uncontested election and plurality voting in contested trustee elections. Because this election is uncontested, each trustee nominee must be elected by a vote of the majority of the votes cast by holders of our common shares, meaning that the number of shares voted “FOR” a trustee must exceed the number of shares voted “AGAINST” that trustee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election of trustees.

If any nominee for trustee fails to receive the required majority vote for election or re-election, the trustee will promptly tender to the Board for its consideration his or her offer to resign from the Board.

Proposals II & III. Approval of each of the other proposals (namely, our proposals to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP and to approve our executive compensation) also requires affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of our common shares voting in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. For the proposals to approve our executive compensation and to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the approval of these proposals. An abstention is the voluntary act of not voting by a shareholder who is present in person or by proxy at a meeting and entitled to vote.

Please note, however, that the vote on Proposals II and III will be advisory only and will not be binding. The results of the votes on these proposals will be taken into consideration by our Board or the appropriate committee of our Board, as applicable, when making future decisions regarding these matters.

How will voting on any other business be conducted?

Other than the proposals described in this Proxy Statement, we know of no other business to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your signed proxy card or Internet or telephonic voting instructions will authorize David A. Spector, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Derek W. Stark, our Secretary, to vote on those matters according to their best judgment.

How do I vote my shares as a shareholder of record?

If you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on the record date, you may vote as instructed on the proxy card by using one of the following methods:

LOGO

By Mail. If you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, please mark your selections on, and sign and date, the printed proxy card, and return the proxy card by mail in the postage-paid envelope provided.

LOGO

By Internet. To vote by Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions at that website. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. If you vote by Internet, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a registered shareholder, you will need to have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for Internet voting instructions.

LOGO

By Telephone. To vote by telephone, registered shareholders should dial 800-690-6903 and follow the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by phone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. You will need the control number found either on the Notice or on the proxy card if you are receiving a printed copy of these materials. If you vote by telephone, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a registered shareholder, you will need to have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for telephone voting instructions.

LOGO

Online Annual Meeting. You may vote your shares during the Annual Meeting (up until the closing of the polls) by following the instructions available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024 during the meeting.

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement65


 INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

If you vote prior to the Annual Meeting, it will assure that your vote is counted. Even if you plan to attend the online Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, so your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether you vote by mail, by Internet or, by telephone, the proxies identified will vote the shares as to which you are the shareholder of record in accordance with your instructions. If a printed proxy card is signed and returned and no instructions are marked, the shares will be voted as recommended by our Board in this Proxy Statement.

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares.

If my broker holds my shares in “street name,” how do I vote my shares?

If you own your shares in “street name,” you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker or other nominee. Your broker or other nominee has provided a voting instruction form for you to use in directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares. Please follow the instructions provided on such voting instruction form.

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

If you submit a signed proxy card and do not specify how you want to vote your shares, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows:

FOR the election of three (3) Class III trustees, David A. Spector, Doug Jones and Catherine A. Lynch each for a term expiring at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024; and

FOR the approval, by non-binding vote, of our executive compensation.

May I revoke my proxy and change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote before it is taken at the Annual Meeting by delivering a written notice of revocation to the attention of our Secretary at 3043 Townsgate

Road, Westlake Village, California 91361 or delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

It means that your shares may be registered differently and in more than one account. Sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.

How are votes counted?

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the election of each nominee for the Board identified in this Proxy Statement. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 and the proposal to approve, by non-binding vote, our executive compensation. An abstention is the voluntary act of not voting by a shareholder who is present at a meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.

If you submit your proxy but abstain from voting on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular proposal with respect to which you abstained from voting or withheld authority to vote. However, because an abstention is not counted as a vote cast, if you abstain from voting on a proposal, your abstention will have no effect on the proposal in question.

If you hold your shares in “street name” and do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. Under NYSE rules, brokers that hold our common shares in street name for customers that are the beneficial owners of those shares may not give a proxy to vote those shares on certain matters, including the election of trustees and our executive compensation program, without specific instructions from those customers. When a broker lacks authority to vote under these circumstances, this is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be considered votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on any proposal to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will count the votes for shares held in “street name” and the votes of shareholders of record. Representatives of our Company will serve as the Inspector of Elections.

How will we solicit proxies for the Annual Meeting?

We are soliciting proxies from our shareholders by mailing the Notice and providing internet access, at www.proxyvote.com, to

66 LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement


 INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

our Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders, and proxy card or voting instruction form. In addition, some of our trustees and officers may make additional solicitations by telephone or in person.

Who bears the cost of soliciting proxies?

We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including preparing and mailing the Notice. To the extent any of our trustees or officers solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile transmission or other personal contact, such persons will receive no additional compensation. Brokerage houses and other nominees, fiduciaries and custodians who are holders of record of common shares will be requested to forward proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of such shares and will be reimbursed by us for their charges and expenses in connection therewith at customary and reasonable rates.

Can I access the Company’s proxy materials and Annual Report to Shareholders electronically?

This Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2023, are available at www.proxyvote.com and on our Investor Relations website, pennymacmortgageinvestmenttrust.com/2024AnnMtg.

Will our external manager be present at the Annual Meeting?

Officers of our Manager, PNMAC Capital Management, LLC, will be present at the Annual Meeting.

When are shareholder proposals due for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

No shareholder proposals were received by us to be presented at the Annual Meeting. We intend to hold next year’s annual meeting of shareholders on approximately the same date as the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, if you are submitting a proposal for possible

inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, we must receive the proposal no later than December 20, 2024. If you are submitting a proposal or nomination for consideration at next year’s annual meeting other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, we must receive the proposal or nomination no earlier than November 20, 2024 and no later than December 20, 2024.

To comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of trustee nominees other than the Company’s nominees for the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act no later than April 14, 2025, including providing a statement that such shareholder intends to solicit the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of the Company’s shares entitled to vote on the election of trustees in support of trustee nominees other than the Company’s nominees. If the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 calendar days from the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, shareholders must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act no later than the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders or the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders is first made.

Who can help answer my questions?

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need additional copies of this Proxy Statement or the proxy card, you should contact:

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust

Attention: Investor Relations

3043 Townsgate Road

Westlake Village, California 91361

Phone: (818) 224-7028

Email: investorrelations@pennymac.com

LOGO  | 2024 Proxy Statement67


Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust LOGO


PENNYMAC MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST

3043 TOWNSGATE ROAD

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 11, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PMT2024

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 11, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
V47488-P10304KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

PENNYMAC MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST

The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR the election of three Class III Trustees as disclosed in Proposal 1:

1.  To elect the three Class III Trustees identified in the enclosed Proxy Statement to serve on our Board of Trustees, each for a term expiring at the 2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 36  Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain 

1a.   David A. Spector

1b.  Doug Jones

1c.   Catherine A. Lynch

The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3:ForAgainstAbstain

2.  To ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

3.  To approve, by non-binding vote, our executive compensation.

NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

 Date


 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available

at www.proxyvote.com.

 

 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

V47489-P10304    

PENNYMAC MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

June 12, 2024 11:00 AM PDT

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

The undersigned hereby appoints David A. Spector and Derek W. Stark, and each of them, with the power to act without the other and with the power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the reverse side, all of the shares of PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on June 12, 2024, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Trustees.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side.